RESEARCH ON BLOCK RENEWAL OF CHENGDU TAIKOO LI FROM A PERSPECTIVE OF “SOCIETY OF SPECTACLES” IN THE POST-CONSUMPTION PERIOD

ZHANG Wenli; YAN Yonghong

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21032201

Volume 51 Issue 11

Mar. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2021 > 51(11): 54-61

ZHANG Wenli, YAN Yonghong. RESEARCH ON BLOCK RENEWAL OF CHENGDU TAIKOO LI FROM A PERSPECTIVE OF “SOCIETY OF SPECTACLES” IN THE POST-CONSUMPTION PERIOD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(11): 54-61. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21032201

Citation:

ZHANG Wenli, YAN Yonghong. RESEARCH ON BLOCK RENEWAL OF CHENGDU TAIKOO LI FROM A PERSPECTIVE OF “SOCIETY OF SPECTACLES” IN THE POST-CONSUMPTION PERIOD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(11): 54-61. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21032201

Citation:

PDF( 8914 KB)

RESEARCH ON BLOCK RENEWAL OF CHENGDU TAIKOO LI FROM A PERSPECTIVE OF “SOCIETY OF SPECTACLES” IN THE POST-CONSUMPTION PERIOD

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21032201

ZHANG Wenli,
YAN Yonghong^,

School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China

Received Date: 2021-03-22
Available Online: 2022-03-29

Abstract

Abstract

In the period of post consumption, the change of consumption spawns new spectacles in urban renewal. Taking Sino-Ocean Taikoo Li as a case, based on the theory of society of spectacles the status in the production of spectacles in historical block renewal was interpreted. The results showed: Taikoo Li was completed the spectacle production by buildings, cultural creation and media, in which every spectacle had different dimensional main bodies and goals. The results proved the production of spectacles was beneficial to rejuvenate urban historical assets and promote of economy, but it might led to over-commercialization.
- society of spectacle,
- consumerism,
- historical block,
- urban renewal,
- Sino-Ocean Taikoo Li,
- Chengdu

FullText(HTML)

References(44)

References

[1]	邹明妍,周铁军.中国政府"企业化"调控下的城市空间企业化现象[J].城市发展研究,2017(11):58-63.
[2]	MOLOTCH H L.The City as a Growth Machine:Toward a Political Economy of Place[J].American Journal of Sociology,1976(82):309-330.
[3]	张文力,严永红.转型期中国城市夜景照明的空间生产过程与机制:以重庆市为例[J].资源开发与市场,2021(6):692-697.
[4]	李和平,杨宁,张玛璐.后消费时代城市文化资本空间生产状况解析[J].人文地理,2016(2):50-54.
[5]	托斯丹·凡勃伦.有闲阶级论[M].蔡受白,译.北京:商务印书馆,2009.
[6]	SIMMEL G.Fashion[J].American Journal of Sociology,1957,5(6):541-558.
[7]	王宇彤,张京祥,何鹤鸣.符号介入:后消费时代的文化空间生产研究:以故宫紫禁书院为例[J].城市发展研究,2020(5):58-64.
[8]	朱旭佳,罗震东.从视觉景观生产到乡村振兴:网红村的产生机制与可持续路径研究[J].上海城市规划,2018(6):45-53.
[9]	张文力,严永红.地方政府企业化背景下的城市夜景照明思考[J].现代城市研究,2021(1):102-108.
[10]	王辉."景观社会"中的工业遗产"造景":天津运河创想中心设计[J].时代建筑,2019(6):106-113.
[11]	居伊·德波.景观社会[M].王昭风,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2006.
[12]	孙佼佼,谢彦君.景观社会:当代旅游研究的情境主义视角[J].人文地理,2020(3):10-16.
[13]	TERKENLI T S.Towards a Theory of the Landscape:The Aegean Landscape as a Cultural Image[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,57(3):197-208.
[14]	JACKSON J B.Discovering the Vernacular Landscape[M].New Haven:Yale University Press,1984.
[15]	COSGROVE D.Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape[M].Madison:University of Wisconsin Press,1998.
[16]	克雷斯韦尔T.地方:记忆,想象与认同[M].王志弘,等,译.台北:群学出版有限公司,2006.
[17]	LEFEBVRE H.The Production of Space[M].Oxford:Blackwell,1991.
[18]	阎嘉."空间修复"与后现代城市空间设计[J].中外文化与文论,2020(1):1-13.
[19]	张京祥,邓化媛.解读城市近现代风貌型消费空间的塑造:基于空间生产理论的分析视角[J].国际城市规划,2009(1):43-47.
[20]	孟嵊.泛艺术化视域下的当代都市消费空间审视:以成都"远洋太古里"为例[J].四川文理学院学报,2019(1):64-68.
[21]	金秋平.成都大慈寺片区更新中传统民居群体空间营造的传承与创新[J].建筑设计管理,2015(7):51-54.
[22]	杨轲轲.全球化、现代化背景下中国艺术的空间话语:以"远洋太古里"和《地球最后的夜晚》为例[J].中外文化与文论,2020(1):262-274.
[23]	郝琳.未来的传统:成都远洋太古里的都市与建筑设计[J].建筑学报,2016(5):43-47.
[24]	FRIEDBERG A.Cinema and the Postmodern Condition[M].New Brunswick:Rutgers University Press,1995.
[25]	周榕.向互联网学习城市:"成都远洋太古里"设计底层逻辑探析[J].建筑学报,2016(5):30-35.
[26]	赵毅衡.都是"审美"惹的祸:说"泛艺术化"[J].文艺争鸣,2011(13):15-18.
[27]	赵小瑭.购物空间的消费文化[D].长春:吉林大学,2008.
[28]	韦尔施V.重构美学[M].陆扬,等,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2006.
[29]	张京祥,罗小龙,殷洁,等.大事件营销与城市的空间生产与尺度跃迁[J].城市问题,2011(1):19-23.
[30]	张京祥,殷洁,罗震东.地域大事件营销效应的城市增长机器分析:以南京奥体新城为例[J].经济地理,2007(3):452-457.
[31]	刘润,黄冰清,蔡思怡,等.节事活动运营与城市空间构建[J].城市观察,2018(4):147-155.
[32]	刘润,杨永春,王梅梅,等.转型期中国城市更新背景下旅游地视觉景观生产研究:以成都宽窄巷为例[J].人文地理,2016(3):136-144.
[33]	桑塔格S.论摄影[M].黄灿然,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2012.
[34]	周宪.视觉文化的消费社会学解析[J].社会学研究,2004(5):58-66.
[35]	沈雨霖.远洋太古里开启体验期[N].成都商报,2014-11-07(28).
[36]	魏姝.成都远洋太古里引爆成都新时尚[N].成都商报,2014-11-28(25).
[37]	钟茜妮.美国硅谷嘉宾逛成都"太古里是时尚生活方式的典范"[N].成都商报,2017-04-05(3).
[38]	佚名.祖·玛珑优雅入驻成都远洋太古里[N].成都商报,2017-10-27(14).
[39]	李伟铭.成都太古里零售额大增21.5%[N].成都商报,2019-03-07(11).
[40]	杨永春.中国模式:渐进制度转型与地理空间演变[M].兰州:兰州大学出版社,2013.
[41]	刘彬,陈忠暖.权力、资本与空间:历史街区改造背景下的城市消费空间生产:以成都远洋太古里为例[J].国际城市规划,2018(1):75-80,118.
[42]	ZUKIN S.Cultural Strategies of Economic Development and the Hegemony of Vision[G]//MERRIFIELD A,SWYNEGEDOUW E.The Urbanization of Injustice.New York:New York University Press,1997:227.
[43]	ZUKIN S.Changing Landscapes of Power:Opulence and the Urge for Authenticity[J].International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2009,32(2):543-553.
[44]	CRUMP J R.What Cannot be Seen Will not be Heard:The Production of Landscape in Moline,Illinois[J].Cultural Geographies,1999,6(3):295-317.