Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
LUO Yuqi, GU Qian, ZHAO Duanfeng, TIAN Shui, TAN Yuan. RESEARCH ON ASEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF T-SHAPED DOUBLE-SIDED COMPOSITED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS WITH CONSTRUCTIONAL EDGE MEMBERS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 90-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21010604
Citation: LUO Yuqi, GU Qian, ZHAO Duanfeng, TIAN Shui, TAN Yuan. RESEARCH ON ASEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF T-SHAPED DOUBLE-SIDED COMPOSITED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS WITH CONSTRUCTIONAL EDGE MEMBERS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 90-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21010604

RESEARCH ON ASEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF T-SHAPED DOUBLE-SIDED COMPOSITED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS WITH CONSTRUCTIONAL EDGE MEMBERS

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21010604
  • Received Date: 2021-01-06
    Available Online: 2022-01-11
  • In order to study the aseismic performance of T-shaped assembled monolithic double-sided composite shear walls with constructional edge members, two full-scale T-shape shear wall specimens were tested. The test results showed that both the composite and cast-in-situ specimens displayed typical bending-shear failure characteristics in the axial compression ratio of 0.2. Compared with cast-in-situ specimens, the ultimate bearing capacity of flanges for composite specimens in the state of tension and compression was reduced by 15.7% and 3.0%; the ductility coefficient of flanges in the state of tension was the same as that of cast-in-situ specimens, while the ductility coefficient of flanges in the state of compression was lower than that of cast-in-situ specimens; the stiffness degradation laws of the two were basically the same. The cumulative energy consumption of composite specimens was significantly lower than that of cast-in-place specimens. The horizontal connection of webs, flanges and T-shaped constructional edges of composite specimens worked well as a whole. According to the test results, it was suggested to improve the stirrup ratio in constructional edge members of the composite specimens.
  • [1]
    连星,叶献国,蒋庆,等.一种新型绿色住宅体系:叠合板式剪力墙体系[J].工业建筑,2010,40(6):79-84

    ,92.
    [2]
    胡轶炜,胡志鹏,王世昕,等.我国叠合板式剪力墙结构研究现状[J]. 四川建材,2016,42(10):24-26.
    [3]
    ALBERTO P, DIONYSIOS A B. Experimental Assessment of the Seismic Performance of a Prefabricated Concrete Structural Wall System[J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(6):2049-2062.
    [4]
    任军,叶献国.不同轴压比下叠合板式剪力墙的抗震性能研究[J]. 结构工程师,2010,26(5):66-72.
    [5]
    肖全东,郭正兴.预制混凝土双板剪力墙抗震性能试验[J]. 土木工程学报,2014,47(增刊2):151-157.
    [6]
    薛伟辰,李亚,蔡磊,等.双面叠合混凝土剪力墙平面内和平面外抗震性能研究[J]. 工程力学,2018,35(5):47-54.
    [7]
    ALPER A, BARIS B, ERDEM C. Cyclic Testing of Reinforced Concrete Double Walls[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2017, 114(2):395-406.
    [8]
    王滋军,李向民,王宇.带有约束边缘构件的预制叠合剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J].中南大学学报,2016,47(8):2759-2767.
    [9]
    黄潇.T形叠合式剪力墙板抗震性能的非线性有限元分析[D].合肥:安徽建筑工业学院,2011.
    [10]
    黄潇,沈小璞,庞培培.不同轴压比下T形叠合式剪力墙的抗震性能的非线性分析[J].安徽建筑工业学院学报,2011,19(4):9-14.
    [11]
    张伟林,沈小璞,吴志新,等.叠合板式剪力墙T型、L型墙体抗震性能试验研究[J].工程力学,2012,29(6):196-201.
    [12]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 装配式混凝土建筑技术标准:GB/T 51231-2016[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2017.
    [13]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程:JGJ 3-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
    [14]
    史庆轩,王斌,何伟锋,等.带翼缘钢筋混凝土剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2017,38(1):106-115.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (109) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return