Experimental and Finite Element Analysis of New Type of Cross-Shaped Gusset-Plate Support Connections to Slotted Tubular Memebers

YU Jinghai; HAN Ping; LI Luchuan; YAN Xiangyu; ZHAO Siyu

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG20121409

Volume 53 Issue 6

Jun. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2023 > 53(6): 129-137

Li Yi, Zhao Wen, Yan Yunqi. METHOD OF CONTINUAL ANALYSIS FOR SYSTEM RELIABILITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(10): 26-28,39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200510009

Citation:

YU Jinghai, HAN Ping, LI Luchuan, YAN Xiangyu, ZHAO Siyu. Experimental and Finite Element Analysis of New Type of Cross-Shaped Gusset-Plate Support Connections to Slotted Tubular Memebers[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(6): 129-137. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20121409

Li Yi, Zhao Wen, Yan Yunqi. METHOD OF CONTINUAL ANALYSIS FOR SYSTEM RELIABILITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(10): 26-28,39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200510009

Citation:

PDF( 15282 KB)

Experimental and Finite Element Analysis of New Type of Cross-Shaped Gusset-Plate Support Connections to Slotted Tubular Memebers

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20121409

1. Research Institute of Architectural Design & Urban Planning Co., Ltd., Tianjin University, Tianjin 300073, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Received Date: 2020-12-14
Available Online: 2023-08-18

Abstract

Abstract

In order to investigate the mechanical properties and failure mechanism of the new type of gusset-plate connections to slotted tubular members, four specimens of this kind of joint were designed for monotonic static loading test. The test parameters studied included plate thickness and load form. The failure mode, joint ultimate bearing capacity of joint, joint displacement and strain distribution of different parts of the joint (circular tube, transverse gusset-plate and vertical gusset-plate) were discussed. The structural parameters affecting the performance indexes of joint specimens (tube wall thickness, tube diameter, plate thickness and number of branches) were analyzed by finite element parametric analysis. Results indicated that there were two types of joint failure modes, gusset-plate failure and tube failure, under the action of axial load on tube; the relative relations between tube wall thickness and gusset-plate thickness mainly determined the plastic deformation capacity of joints. For the joint specimens with two branches, when the thickness of the gusset-plate was greater than that of the tube wall, the specimen failed at the junction of the circular tube and gusset-plate, and this damage was ductile failure; when the thickness of the gusset-plate was less than that of the tube wall, the specimen bent or broke at the bottom of the gusset-plate, and this damage was brittle failure. For the joint specimens with four branches, the gusset-plate thickness should be 2 times the tube wall thickness to ensure the plastic development and ultimate bearing capacity of the joint.
- gusset-plate support connections to slotted tubular members,
- joint experiment,
- failure mode,
- finite element analysis,
- parametric analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

[1]	CHENG J J R,KULAK G L,KHOO H. Strength of slotted tubular tension members[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,1998,25(6):982-991.
[2]	WILLIBALD S,PACKER J A,MARTINEZ-SAUCEDO G. Behaviour of gusset plate connections to ends of round and elliptical hollow structural section members[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,2006,33(4):373-383.
[3]	MARTINEZ-SAUCEDO G,PACKER J A,CHRISTOPOULOS C. Gusset plate connections to circular hollow section braces under inelastic cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2008,134(7):1252-1258.
[4]	MARTINEZ-SAUCEDO G,PACKER J A. Static design recommendations for slotted end hss connections in tension[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2009,135(7):797-805.
[5]	LING T W,ZHAO X L,AL-MAHAIDI R,et al. Investigation of shear lag failure in gusset-plate welded structural steel hollow section connections[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2007,63(3):293-304.
[6]	舒兴平,丁兆龙,陈方红,等.管板连接轴心受拉构件极限承载力试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2007,28(5):61-68.
[7]	舒兴平,翁兰溪,袁智深,等.管板连接轴心受压构件极限承载力试验研究[J].建筑结构,2008,38(10):21-23.
[8]	舒兴平,肖又箐,袁智深,等.K形管板节点极限承载力研究[J].建筑结构,2010,40(5):92-96.
[9]	American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Specification for structural steel buildings:ANSI/AISC 360-2016[S]. Chicago: AISC, 2016.
[10]	Canadian Standards Association (CSA). Design of steel structures:CAN/CSA S16-2019[S]. Ottawa: CSA, 2019.
[11]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 空间网格结构技术规程:JGJ 7—2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
[12]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢结构设计标准:GB 50017—2017[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
[13]	田春雨,马军,马洪涛. 济南奥体中西体育场节点模型试验研究[J]. 空间结构,2009,15(1):28-34.
[14]	童乐为,周丽瑛,陈以一,等. 上海旗忠网球中心屋盖支座圆管节点强度研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2007,28(1):37-44.
[15]	皇甫木东. 支座节点的转动性能及其对钢桁架稳定性的影响[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2017.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHOU Wansen, ZHONG Jufang, ZHANG Yanhong, HU Xiao. Research on Time-Frequency Parameter Prediction Models of Ground Motion[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(12): 177-185. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22110105
[2]	SUN Xiaoyun, HUANG Linjie, ZENG Bin, SHI Zheng, XIE Qin. Analysis of Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Concrete Frame Structures Characterized by Low Prestressing and Slope Friction[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(10): 38-45. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24091003
[3]	SUI Weining, MA Yong, YANG Haitao, WU Jinguo. Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of a New Connection Joint Between PC External Wall Panel and Steel Frame with Frictional Energy Dissipation[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(5): 109-117. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22011501
[4]	LIU Hang, LI Mu, YANG Xuezhong, HAN Mingjie, TIAN Yuji. Experimental Research on Seismic Performance of Self-centering Prefabricated RC Frame Structures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(1): 65-73. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062601
[5]	HUANG Linjie, ZENG Bin, ZHOU Zhen, ZHANG Wenqing, SANG Chenxu, ZHANG Jingru. Influence of Joint Stiffness After Gap Opening on Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames with Variable Friction Dampers[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(12): 88-93. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22072916
[6]	CHANG Zhaoqun, LIU Boquan, HAN Meng, BAI Tao, XING Guohua, WANG Shuangbing. DESIGN AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF AN INNOVATIVE SELF-CENTERING FRICTION DAMPER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 138-142,221. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20080402
[7]	HUANG Ming, LIU Ye, DING Yi, LYU Qingfang. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON SELF-CENTERING CLB ROCKING WALL EQUIPPED WITH CFD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 40-46,61. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21042509
[8]	HAN Tengfei, XU Gang, LI Liang, LI Xiaodong, XI Xiangdong. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF SHEAR RESISTANCE OF FRICTION CONNECTION WITH HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(11): 133-136. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201909120001
[9]	HUANG, Linjie, ZHOU, Zhen. INVESTIGATION ON INFLUENCE OF INFILL WALLS ON HIGHER MODE EFFECT OF SELF-CENTERING PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 34-39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001007
[10]	MENG, Shaoping, CAI, Xiaoning. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON PRESTRESSED SELF-RESETTING CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 1-6. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001001
[11]	MA, Junfeng, ZHOU, Zhen. HYSTERICAL BEHAVIOR OF AN UPPER-BOTTOM FRICTION DAMPER SELF-CENTERING PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTION WITH HIDDEN CORBEL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 16-21,124. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001004
[14]	Liu Pengfei, Zhao Qilin, Jiang Kebin, Gao Hesheng. THEORETIC RESEARCH ON FRICTION LOSS OF PRE-STRESS IN LARGE-SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(10): 64-67. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201110016
[15]	Wu Yingjun, Chen Zhihua, LüQing. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF ROLL CABLE-STRUT JOINT IN SUSPEND-DOME[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(8): 27-29,34. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201008007
[16]	Wu Zhuanqin, Zeng Zhaobo, Shang Renjie, Liu Jingliang. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FRICTION COEFFICIENT OF RETARD-BONDED PRESTRESSING STRAND[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(11): 20-23. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200811006
[17]	Cai Jiangyong. IMPROVING SUGGESTION ON CALCULATION METHOD OF FRICTION LOSS IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(4): 94-95,75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200404029