Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Included in the Hierarchical Directory of High-quality Technical Journals in Architecture Science Field
Volume 51 Issue 11
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
MA Hongwei, WEI Zengting, LIU Weiya. PULL-OUT TEST AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ANCHORAGE-EMBEDDED PARTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(11): 81-89. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20110403
Citation: MA Hongwei, WEI Zengting, LIU Weiya. PULL-OUT TEST AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ANCHORAGE-EMBEDDED PARTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(11): 81-89. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20110403

PULL-OUT TEST AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ANCHORAGE-EMBEDDED PARTS

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20110403
  • Received Date: 2020-11-04
    Available Online: 2022-03-29
  • The connections of anchorage-embedded parts have been widely used in cable-supported curtain walls, which bear large tensile forces. In order to understand the actual mechanical properties of anchorage-embedded parts in connection of cables, 3 specimens of anchorage-embedded parts with a single tensional cable and 2 specimens of anchorage-embedded parts with three tensional cables were fabricated, and the tests of tensile bearing capacity for specimens were performed. The results showed that: when the anchorage length was longer than 30 times the diameter of the steel bar and the end was reinforced, the bond slip failure between the concrete and the anchorage parts would not occur, but only the anchorage parts would break. In the connections, the loads in the side cable would not impact on the bearing capacity of the middle cable. In addition, a single cable connection was simulated by FEM. Comparing the two results, it showed that the load-displacement curve of the anchorage-embedded parts with a single tensional cable obtained by FEM was in good agreement with the curve obtained from tests, and the error of the yield load and the ultimate load all less 6%.
  • loading
  • [1]
    常华.拉索式点连接全玻璃幕墙的设计与结构分析[D].太原:太原理工大学,2005.
    [2]
    邱泉,杨春梅,任国亮.俄罗斯远东联邦大学学生中心入口幕墙支承结构选型分析[J].建筑钢结构进展,2013(4):47-52,64.
    [3]
    殷永炜,张其林,王丹,等.点支式玻璃幕墙索桁架支承体系的结构性能研究[J].结构工程师,2005,21(2):17-21.
    [4]
    朱奕锋,冯健.点支承玻璃幕墙的柔性支撑体系-索桁架[J].工业建筑,2002,32(5):1-4

    ,37.
    [5]
    王宝珍,张宽权.预埋件计算方法的试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,1981(2):58-66.
    [6]
    预埋件专题研究组.预埋件的受力性能及设计方法[J].建筑结构学报,1987(3):36-50.
    [7]
    殷芝霖,李玉温.钢筋混凝土结构中预埋件的设计方法(三):轴心受拉和偏心受拉预埋件[J].工业建筑,1988,18(6):46-54.
    [8]
    李国强,曲冰,孙飞飞,等.高层建筑混合结构钢梁与混凝土墙节点低周反复加载试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2003(4):1-7.
    [9]
    王清湘,朱耀国.大直径锚筋预埋件纯剪、拉剪作用下的试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2008,29(增刊1):281-286.
    [10]
    王安彬.火灾后锚筋预埋件的剩余承载力研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2013.
    [11]
    周辉,石国立,李闯,等.超规预埋件足尺承载力试验研究[J].施工技术,2015,44(9):80-86.
    [12]
    王秀娟,庞翠翠,吕晓寅,等.钢筋混凝土结构预埋件的计算与分析[J].科学技术与工程,2010,10(23):5796-5798.
    [13]
    马臣杰,钟玉柏,许璇.幕墙预埋件承载力非线性有限元分析[J].建筑结构,2011,41(2):94-96

    ,88.
    [14]
    朱耀国,王清湘.预埋件受剪性能数值分析[J].大连理工大学学报,2014,54(2):210-214.
    [15]
    ROEDER C W,HAWKINS N M.Connections Between Steel Frames and Concrete Walls[J].Engineering Journal,1981,18:22-29.
    [16]
    OBATA M,INOUE M,GOTO Y.The Failure Mechanism and the Pull-Out Strength of a Bond-Type Anchor Near a Free Edge[J].Mechanics of Materials,1998,28(1/2/3/4):113-122.
    [17]
    KHALIL A A,FAWZY T M,TAHER S,et al.New Special Finite Elements for Modeling Reinforcement and Steel-Concrete Interface[J].Engineering Computations,1999,16(5):619-629.
    [18]
    王蔚,张广杰.中美规范混凝土预埋件设计对比分析[J].港工技术,2016,53(5):46-50.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (105) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return