Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Included in the Hierarchical Directory of High-quality Technical Journals in Architecture Science Field
Volume 51 Issue 6
Oct.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Yanming, WANG Xiaofeng, ZHAO Yong. MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF EARLY-AGE CAMBER OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DOUBLETEES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(6): 67-71. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20080704
Citation: LIU Yanming, WANG Xiaofeng, ZHAO Yong. MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF EARLY-AGE CAMBER OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DOUBLETEES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(6): 67-71. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20080704

MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF EARLY-AGE CAMBER OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE DOUBLETEES

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20080704
  • Received Date: 2020-08-07
    Available Online: 2021-10-27
  • The cambers of three prestressed concrete doubletees with concrete strength grade of C50 at the moment of prestressed tendons releasing and the age of 7 days were measured, meanwhile, the elastic modulus and compressive strength of the concrete specimens with the same material and curing condition were tested. The result showed that when steam curing for 30 hours or natural curing for 3 days, the compressive strength of the concrete could reach 80% of the designed concrete strength grade value, but the elastic modulus of the concrete only reached 38~55% of the standard value. The elastic modulus of the tested concrete with an age of 7 days could reach its standard value. Compared to natural-cured concrete, the compressive strength and elastic modulus of steam-cured concrete developed more rapidly. The time-effect model of concrete elastic modulus within the age of 7 days was obtained by regression analysis. Then a simulation analysis of the cambers at the age of 7 days was carried out based on the model of creep and shrinkage in MC 2010, and the calculated values were almost coincident with the measured values.
  • loading
  • [1]
    王茂宇,郑毅敏,赵勇.中美预制预应力混凝土双T板构件对比[J].混凝土与水泥制品,2014(8):42-45.
    [2]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构工程施工质量验收规范:GB 50204-2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
    [3]
    张建仁,王海臣,杨伟军.混凝土早期抗压强度和弹性模量的试验研究[J].中外公路,2003(3):89-92.
    [4]
    冯太坤.混凝土的强度与抗压弹性模量增长变化初探[J].中国高新技术企业,2007(4):158.
    [5]
    International Federation for Structural Concrete. fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010:MC 2010[S]. Berlin, Germany:Wilhelm Ernst & Sohn, 2013.
    [6]
    吴志寰.早强剂对混凝土强度和弹性模量的影响[J].铁道建筑,2005(5):93-94.
    [7]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构工程施工规范:GB 50666-2011[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
    [8]
    王薇,李亚楠.早强剂对混凝土早期抗压强度影响试验研究[J].建材发展导向,2019,17(4):93-95.
    [9]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
    [10]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50081-2016[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
    [11]
    陈洪光,许将.C50泵送混凝土弹性模量影响因素的试验研究[J].隧道建设,2012,32(6):802-805.
    [12]
    YOUAKIM S A, GHALI A, HIDA S E, et al. Prediction of Long-Term Prestress Losses[J]. PCI Journal, 2007, 52(2):116-130.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (86) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return