Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Zhang Yankun, Liu Yanghua, Song Xiaoruan. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FLEXURAL BEARING CAPACITY OF PROFILED STEEL SHEET-LIGHT-WEIGHT AGGREGATE CONCRETE FLOOR SLABS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(8): 83-85. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200808021
Citation: LI Tao, ZHU Baolong, LUO Bo, WANG Xiong, LI Xin. STUDY ON LOAD-BEARING CHARACTERISTICS OF PILES AND LINING STRUCTURE FOR TUNNELS IN TUNNEL-LANDSLIDE SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT SPACEINGS OF ANTI-SLIDE PILES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 31-38. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20040307

STUDY ON LOAD-BEARING CHARACTERISTICS OF PILES AND LINING STRUCTURE FOR TUNNELS IN TUNNEL-LANDSLIDE SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT SPACEINGS OF ANTI-SLIDE PILES

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20040307
  • Received Date: 2020-04-03
    Available Online: 2021-11-11
  • According to a practical project, a scale model of 1:100 was constructed, the load-bearing characteristics of anti-silde piles and lining structure for tunnels in the tunnel-landslide system with three kinds of pile spacing were studied, the top displacement of anti-slide piles, tunnel displacement, earth pressure on tunnels in landslides were analyzed. The variable regularities of the moment in pile shafts and tunnels subjected to graded loads and the support effect of anti-slide piles with different spacings for the tunnel-landslide system were observed as well. The experimental results showed as the spacing of anti-slide piles was increased from 2.08 times the length of the pile diameter to 4.16 and 6.24 times,the horizontal displacement of pile tops or tunnels, earth pressure on pile shafts or tunnels,and moment in pile shafts and tunnels gradually increased. As pile spacing was increased from 4.16 times the length of the pile diameter to 6.24 times, the increase of displacement and moment was much larger than that of pile spacing increased from 2.08 times the length of the pile diameter to 4.16 times. Thus, if the thrust of landslides was small, the pile spacing could be promoted properly. When the thrust of landslides was large, the pile spacing should be reduced to beneficially ensured the safety of lining structure for tunnels. Whether it was large or small for thrust, the spacing of anti-slide piles with 4.16 times the length of the pile diameter was a high cost-performance choice for tunnel protection.
  • [1]
    ITO T, MATSUI T, HONG W P. Design Method for the Stability Analysis of the Slope with Landing Pier[J]. Soils and foundations, 1979, 19(4):43-57.
    [2]
    CAI F, UGAI K. Response of Flexible Piles Under Laterally Linear Movement of the Sliding Layer in Landslides[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(1):46-53.
    [3]
    孙书伟, 朱本珍, 马惠民, 等.微型桩群与普通抗滑桩抗滑特性的对比试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(10):1564-1569.
    [4]
    陶志平, 周德培.用抗滑桩整治滑坡地段隧道变形的模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(3):457-460.
    [5]
    陶志平, 周德培.滑坡地段隧道变形整治中抗滑桩的设计方法[J]. 山地学报, 2003, 21(5):620-623.
    [6]
    郑颖人, 赵尚毅.有限元强度折减法在土坡与岩坡中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(19):3381-3388.
    [7]
    马惠民, 吴红刚.隧道-滑坡体系的研究进展和展望[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(2):522-530.
    [8]
    蒋良潍, 黄润秋, 蒋忠信.黏性土桩间土拱效应计算与桩间距分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(3):445-450.
    [9]
    周德培, 肖世国, 夏雄.边坡工程中抗滑桩合理桩间距的探讨[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2004, 26(1):132-136.
    [10]
    孙书伟, 朱本珍, 马惠民.框架微型桩结构抗滑特性的模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(增刊1):3039-3044.
    [11]
    刘洪佳, 门玉明, 李寻昌, 等.悬臂式抗滑桩模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(10):2960-2966.
    [12]
    欧孝夺, 唐迎春, 崔伟, 等.h型抗滑桩模型试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(9):1936-1943.
    [13]
    魏作安, 李世海, 赵颖.底端嵌固桩与滑体相互作用的物理模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(8):2655-2659.
    [14]
    雷文杰, 郑颖人, 王恭先, 等.沉埋桩加固滑坡体模型试验的机制分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(7):1347-1355.
    [15]
    储召军, 石少卿, 孙建虎, 等.基于模型试验的桩间距对组合式钢管抗滑桩抗滑效果的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(3):848-853

    , 862.
    [16]
    戴自航.抗滑桩滑坡推力和桩前滑体抗力分布规律的研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(4):517-521.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]DU Taoming, SONG Songke, LIU Wei, QUAN Xinrui, KONG Debiao. Elastoplastic Analytical Solutions for Borehole Contraction of Bored Piles by Boring Unloading Based on Unified Strength Theory[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(7): 188-195. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23092004
    [2]HU Dazhu, YANG Zhenqiao, ZHU Qichang, WU Zhiping, ZHAO Juan. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON MECHANIC PROPERTIES OF PREFABRICATED REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS WITH H-SHAPED STEEL JOINTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(6): 59-66,23. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20042108
    [3]Chi Yuyu Li Junhua Yu Kai Shi Zhe, . STUDY OF FORCE TRANSFER BEHAVIOR FOR SRC MEMBERS WITH STUD SHEAR CONNECTORS UNDER CYCLIC REVERSED LOADING AFTER EXPOSURE TO HIGH TEMPERATURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(7): 159-163. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201507032
    [4]Li Xiaofen, Liu Lixin, Zhang Huipeng. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON BOND BEHAVIORS OF PRESTRESSED STRANDS BY PULL-OUT TEST[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(5): 65-69. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201505015
    [5]Wu Huazong, Li Junhua, Chi Yuyu, Qiu Dongliang. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF BOND-SLIP BEHAVIOR OF SRC MEMBERS UNDER CYCLIC REVERSED LOADING AFTER HIGH TEMPERATURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(5): 138-142. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201505029
    [6]Hu Xinguo, Zhu Han. EFFECTS OF ADDING BASALT FIBER ON BOND PROPERTIES BETWEEN DEFORMED BAR AND CONCRETE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(3): 84-87. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201303018
    [7]Shen Bin, Qin Jie, Li Guoli, Qian Yingxin, Yang Zhiming. THE PRESTRESS CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY OF A BEAM STRING STRUCTURE FOR BEIJING NORTH STATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(12): 12-14,25. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200812004
    [8]Huang Mingxin, Qian Weijun, Huang Kailong, Chen Bin, Mao Cheng. ERECTION TECHNOLOGY OF LARGE SPAN CHORD -TENSION TRUSS STRUCTURE FOR HARBIN INTERNATIONAL EXHIBITION CENTER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(9): 41-44. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200709007
    [9]Jiang Jianping, Gao Guangyun. STUDY ON BEARING CAPACITY PER VOLUME OF BORED-CAST-PLACE PILES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(9): 43-45.
    [10]Huang Wei, Feng Dingguo. TEST AND RESEARCH ON SLIDING AND SHOCK INSULATION OF LARGE BAY REINFORCED CONCRETE AND BRICK CONSTRUCTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(12): 47-50,79. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200512014
    [11]Pei Jie, Shui Weihou, Cao Hui. NEW MODEL OF LONG PILE LOAD TRANSFER FOR SOFT FOUNDATION IN SHANGHAI[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(7): 50-54,49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200507015
    [12]Yao Yong, Wang Ruheng, Lei Jinsong. ANALYSIS OF PRESSURE GROUTING AT PILE TIP OF BORED PILES IN PEBBLE STRATUM AND ITS BEARING CHARACTERISTICS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(7): 59-63. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200507017
    [13]Chen Liuguo, Fang Congqi, Kou Xinjian, Chen Bing. BOND PROPERTY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE WITH CORRODED REINFORCEMENT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(5): 15-17. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200405005
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-030123456
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.8 %FULLTEXT: 18.8 %META: 80.6 %META: 80.6 %PDF: 0.5 %PDF: 0.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 19.9 %其他: 19.9 %China: 0.5 %China: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %东莞: 0.5 %东莞: 0.5 %北京: 4.8 %北京: 4.8 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %嘉兴: 1.1 %嘉兴: 1.1 %士嘉堡: 1.6 %士嘉堡: 1.6 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %太原: 2.2 %太原: 2.2 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %张家口: 3.2 %张家口: 3.2 %成都: 0.5 %成都: 0.5 %扬州: 1.1 %扬州: 1.1 %晋城: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %曼谷: 9.7 %曼谷: 9.7 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %武汉: 3.2 %武汉: 3.2 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %泰安: 0.5 %泰安: 0.5 %温州: 1.6 %温州: 1.6 %漯河: 3.8 %漯河: 3.8 %盐城: 0.5 %盐城: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %绍兴: 1.6 %绍兴: 1.6 %芒廷维尤: 26.3 %芒廷维尤: 26.3 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 1.1 %西宁: 1.1 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 5.4 %运城: 5.4 %迪庆: 0.5 %迪庆: 0.5 %邯郸: 1.1 %邯郸: 1.1 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %铜陵: 0.5 %铜陵: 0.5 %其他China上海东莞北京南京嘉兴士嘉堡天津太原宣城广州张家口成都扬州晋城曼谷朝阳武汉沈阳泰安温州漯河盐城石家庄绍兴芒廷维尤苏州衢州西宁贵阳运城迪庆邯郸郑州重庆铜陵

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (125) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return