Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
CHEN Tianlei, XIE Sa, WU Jian. IMMERSION TEST RESEARCH ON NEGATIVE FRICTION RESISTANCE FOR SOIL DISPLACEMENT SCREW PILES IN SELF-WEIGHT COLLAPSIBLE LOESS FOUNDATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(6): 11-15. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202006003
Citation: CHEN Tianlei, XIE Sa, WU Jian. IMMERSION TEST RESEARCH ON NEGATIVE FRICTION RESISTANCE FOR SOIL DISPLACEMENT SCREW PILES IN SELF-WEIGHT COLLAPSIBLE LOESS FOUNDATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(6): 11-15. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202006003

IMMERSION TEST RESEARCH ON NEGATIVE FRICTION RESISTANCE FOR SOIL DISPLACEMENT SCREW PILES IN SELF-WEIGHT COLLAPSIBLE LOESS FOUNDATION

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202006003
  • Received Date: 2019-09-27
  • Publish Date: 2020-08-20
  • Soil displacement screw(SDS)piles have been widely used in engineering fields, but the theoretical basis of design for SDS piles in collopsible loess zones was still absent. In order to explore the mechanical properties under immersion states, a full-scale immersion test of mechanical properties for SDS piles was carried out. The negative friction characteristics of two-way SDS piles along pile shafts under immersion were obtained.
  • 王康. 双向螺旋挤土灌注桩(SDS桩)在湿陷性黄土地基中的应用[J]. 科技视界,2017(20):83-84.
    陈天镭,牛梦实,谢飒. 自重湿陷性黄土地基中双向螺旋挤土灌注桩的"肥桩效应"及复合地基湿陷系数的变化规律[J].工业建筑,2020,50(6):6-10.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHU Yanpeng, LYU Yubao, FANG Guangwen, WANG Hao, ZHANG Zhiqi. Experimental Study on Frost Resistance of Fluidized Solidifiable Soil Integrated by Collapsible Loess and Red Sandstone[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(12): 194-203. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22101715
    [2]DU Siyi, LI Chenhui. IMPROVEMENT OF THE SIMPLE CONVERSION METHOD FOR LOAD-SETTLEMENT CURVES IN SELF-BALANCE TESTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(5): 145-150. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20022605
    [3]WANG Zhaohui, CHEN Tianlei. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON A NOVEL PILE WITH NEGATIVE FRICTIONAL RESISTANCE-REDUCED ACTIVELY IN COLLAPSIBLE LOESS FOUNDATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(5): 151-157,144. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20062403
    [4]CHEN Tianlei, NIU Mengshi, XIE Sa. DESIGN PARAMETERS OF SDS-PILE COMPOSITE FOUNDATION IN SELF-WEIGHT COLLAPSIBLE LOESS FOUNDATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(6): 16-21. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202006004
    [5]CHEN Tianlei, NIU Mengshi, XIE Sa. “FATTING PILE EFFECT” AND CHANGE LAWS OF COLLAPSIBLE COEFFICIENTS COMPACTED WITH SDS PILES IN SELF-WEIGHT COLLAPSE LOESS FOUNDATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(6): 6-10. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202006002
    [6]CHEN Tianlei, LI Xudong, GAO Yuguang. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF TREATMENT FOR DEEP THICKNESS SELF-WEIGHT COLLAPSIBLE LOESS FOUNDATION WITH TWO-WAY SOIL DISPLACEMENT SCREW PILES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(6): 1-5,28. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202006001
    [10]Huang Ting Dai Guoliang Wu Bin, . MODEL TESTS ON NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION ON PILES CONSIDERING SEQUENCE LOADED ON PILE HEAD AND SURCHARGE AROUND PILES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(6): 98-102. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201506020
    [11]Ren Yutao, Han Xiaolei, Li Sujuan. APPLICATION OF UNDERPINNING PILE BY MANUAL DIGGING IN TREATMENT OF COLLAPSIBLE LOESS FOUNDATION ACCIDENT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(6): 118-122. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201006027
    [12]Cheng Zehai, Wang Linghan. RESEARCH ON EFFECT OF WATER LEVEL FALL ON VERTICALLY LOADED SINGLE PILE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(5): 71-74. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200905015
    [13]Gao Xiaojuan, Zhu Xiangrong, Yang Xiaobin. STATIC LOAD TEST OF THE SQUEEZED BRANCH PILE IN COLLAPSIBLE LOESS FOUNDATION AFTER PREWETTING PROCESSING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(9): 46-49.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 吴清星,侯维杰,张孬,卢培刚,康楠,靳文博,刘鹏飞. 非自重湿陷性黄土地区双向螺旋挤土灌注桩复合地基应用效果分析. 勘察科学技术. 2023(01): 21-26 .
    2. 许宏丽. 强夯法处理湿陷性黄土地基施工技术要点分析. 四川建材. 2022(01): 81-82 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-052025-0602.557.510
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 3.8 %FULLTEXT: 3.8 %META: 91.3 %META: 91.3 %PDF: 4.9 %PDF: 4.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.9 %其他: 6.9 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 1.9 %China: 1.9 %Malaysia: 0.2 %Malaysia: 0.2 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %三明: 0.1 %三明: 0.1 %上海: 2.3 %上海: 2.3 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乐山: 0.3 %乐山: 0.3 %佛山: 0.5 %佛山: 0.5 %信阳: 0.2 %信阳: 0.2 %兰州: 1.8 %兰州: 1.8 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %包头: 0.2 %包头: 0.2 %北京: 15.0 %北京: 15.0 %南京: 2.3 %南京: 2.3 %南宁: 0.6 %南宁: 0.6 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %厦门: 0.7 %厦门: 0.7 %台州: 1.0 %台州: 1.0 %合肥: 0.9 %合肥: 0.9 %周口: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.5 %呼和浩特: 0.5 %咸阳: 0.2 %咸阳: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %商丘: 0.2 %商丘: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 1.0 %天津: 1.0 %太原: 0.7 %太原: 0.7 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安康: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %安顺: 0.1 %安顺: 0.1 %定西: 0.5 %定西: 0.5 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜春: 0.2 %宜春: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %宿州: 0.3 %宿州: 0.3 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %广安: 0.2 %广安: 0.2 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %库比蒂诺: 0.5 %库比蒂诺: 0.5 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %开封: 0.1 %开封: 0.1 %张家口: 0.2 %张家口: 0.2 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %恩施: 0.2 %恩施: 0.2 %成都: 2.0 %成都: 2.0 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %抚州: 0.1 %抚州: 0.1 %攀枝花: 0.1 %攀枝花: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 1.5 %昆明: 1.5 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 1.8 %杭州: 1.8 %枣庄: 0.2 %枣庄: 0.2 %柳州: 0.1 %柳州: 0.1 %桂林: 0.5 %桂林: 0.5 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武威: 0.2 %武威: 0.2 %武汉: 1.1 %武汉: 1.1 %沈阳: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %泰州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.7 %洛阳: 0.7 %济南: 1.0 %济南: 1.0 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海口: 0.6 %海口: 0.6 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 1.4 %深圳: 1.4 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %渭南: 0.1 %渭南: 0.1 %湖州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.3 %湘潭: 0.3 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %漯河: 0.5 %漯河: 0.5 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %白银: 0.1 %白银: 0.1 %盐城: 0.5 %盐城: 0.5 %石家庄: 1.2 %石家庄: 1.2 %福州: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %美国: 0.1 %美国: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 15.3 %芒廷维尤: 15.3 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %苏州: 0.8 %苏州: 0.8 %荆州: 0.1 %荆州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.6 %衢州: 0.6 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 6.7 %西宁: 6.7 %西安: 4.1 %西安: 4.1 %贵港: 0.1 %贵港: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %资阳: 0.1 %资阳: 0.1 %赤峰: 0.1 %赤峰: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %运城: 1.7 %运城: 1.7 %连云港: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邢台: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %重庆: 1.1 %重庆: 1.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %银川: 0.6 %银川: 0.6 %镇江: 1.0 %镇江: 1.0 %长春市朝阳区: 0.2 %长春市朝阳区: 0.2 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %长治: 0.7 %长治: 0.7 %阳泉: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.2 %青岛: 0.9 %青岛: 0.9 %驻马店: 0.1 %驻马店: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaMalaysiaUnited States[]三明上海临汾丽水乌鲁木齐乐山佛山信阳兰州加利福尼亚州包头北京南京南宁南昌南通厦门台州合肥周口呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨商丘嘉兴大连天津太原宁波安康安顺定西宜昌宜春宣城宿州常州广安广州库比蒂诺廊坊开封张家口徐州恩施成都扬州抚州攀枝花无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州枣庄柳州桂林榆林武威武汉沈阳泰州洛阳济南济宁海口淄博深圳温州渭南湖州湘潭湛江漯河烟台白银盐城石家庄福州美国芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州衢州襄阳西宁西安贵港贵阳资阳赤峰达州运城连云港遵义邢台邯郸郑州鄂州重庆铁岭银川镇江长春市朝阳区长沙长治阳泉青岛驻马店黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (806) PDF downloads(45) Cited by(7)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return