YU Lanlan, BAI Zhiqiang, WEI Yanhui, CHEN Jing, MA Kejian. INFLUENCE OF STIFFENING PLATE ON THE STATIC MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TUBE SHEAR-RESISTANT CONNECTOR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 139-144,120. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005023
Citation:
YU Lanlan, BAI Zhiqiang, WEI Yanhui, CHEN Jing, MA Kejian. INFLUENCE OF STIFFENING PLATE ON THE STATIC MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TUBE SHEAR-RESISTANT CONNECTOR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2020, 50(5): 139-144,120. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005023
YU Lanlan, BAI Zhiqiang, WEI Yanhui, CHEN Jing, MA Kejian. INFLUENCE OF STIFFENING PLATE ON THE STATIC MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TUBE SHEAR-RESISTANT CONNECTOR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 139-144,120. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005023
Citation:
YU Lanlan, BAI Zhiqiang, WEI Yanhui, CHEN Jing, MA Kejian. INFLUENCE OF STIFFENING PLATE ON THE STATIC MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TUBE SHEAR-RESISTANT CONNECTOR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2020, 50(5): 139-144,120. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005023
INFLUENCE OF STIFFENING PLATE ON THE STATIC MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF SQUARE TUBE SHEAR-RESISTANT CONNECTOR
1. The Architecture Engineering College, Weifang University, Weifang 261061, China;
2. The Spatial Research Center of Guizhou University, Guiyang 550003, China
Received Date: 2019-12-20
Publish Date:
2020-07-14
Abstract
The connection of square tube shear connector and H-shaped steel rib has been used in steel-concrete composite open-web sandwich plate recently. In order to study the mechanical properties of connection area, two full-scale specimens were manufactured to conduct contrast test and FEM analysis.The results showed that stiffening plate could make an obvious elastic-plastic behavior by seeting stiffening plate on the side wall of square tube shear connector. The stiffening plate could make a greater contribution to the tube's lateral stiffness and local stress concentration. Further finite element analysis showed that the width and thickness of stiffening plate, especially the plate width, had a significant effect on the stress distribution and lateral stiffness of shear connector.
References
白志强,魏艳辉,卢亚琴,等. 钢-混凝土组合空腹夹层板基本频率的参数分析[J].空间结构,2018,24(4):68-73.
姜岚, 马克俭, 张华刚,等. 协同式空腹夹层板动力特性分析及舒适度研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2017,37(6):122-131.
孙涛, 马克俭, 刘宪庆,等. 钢空腹夹层板结构等效剪切刚度分析[J]. 空间结构, 2017, 23(2):54-59.
LUAN H, MA K, QIN Y, et al. Investigation of the Structural Behavior of an Innovative Steel Open-Web Floor System[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2017, 17(4):1365-1378.
陈强,肖建春,马克俭,等.剪力键节点域对钢空腹夹层板静力特征的影响分析[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版),2018,43(1):41-49.
刘卓群, 马克俭, 肖建春,等. 混凝土板对钢空腹夹层板楼盖静力性能影响分析[J]. 广西大学学报(自然科学版), 2016(1):1-10.
刘卓群, 肖建春, 陈靖,等. 钢-混凝土组合空腹夹层板关键部位力学特性分析[J]. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版), 2015(3):119-122.
黄勇, 陈伟刚, 段莉. 钢管混凝土短柱(剪力键)受剪性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2011, 32(12):178-185.
刘卓群, 马克俭, 肖建春,等. 加劲板对钢空腹夹层板剪力键节点静力特性影响分析[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2017, 19(2):29-37.
白志强,刘晓东,邢栋,等.连接T形钢肋方钢管剪力键的静力性能试验[J].工业建筑,2018,48(10):159-164.
Relative Articles
[1] ZHAO Qiu, CHEN Peng, LIN Zhiping, ZHANG Junchao. A Calculation Method of Overall Stability for Flat Plate Stiffened Panels Under Compression [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(10): 138-146. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22020911
[2] LI Yuhuan, CHANG Haosong, FU Yanqing, REN Zhikuan, CHANG Hailin. Research on S -N Curves of 930 MPa Large-Diameter High-Strength Cold-Rolled Threaded Prestressed Steel Rebars [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(1): 115-122. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23111502
[3] XIONG Qingqing, GUI Haiwei, ZHANG Wang, LI Ge. Finite Element Parametric Analysis of Seismic Performance of Wide-Flange L-Shaped CFST Composite Columns with Built-in PBL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(5): 7-16,173. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22042402
[4] MEN Jinjie, GAO Ruixiang, LI Ran, LAN Tao, QIN Guangchong, TAN Luhuai. Influence of Welding Effect in Different Welding Conditions on Stiffened Wallboards of Prefabricated Box-Plate Steel Structures [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(1): 41-49,134. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22041412
[5] YUAN Jun, QU Songzhao, WANG Huchang, WEI Sitong, SUN Qing. Research on Mechanical Properties and Failure Criteria of Ring-Stiffened Tube-Gusset Plate Joints [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(11): 156-160,187. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21083107
[6] LIU Dianzhong, LI Hongxian, YANG Kai. MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE TESTS AND NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF COMPOSITE CONCRETE TWO-WAY SLABS REINFORCED WITH COLD-FORMED THIN-WALL SQUARE STEEL TUBES [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(10): 170-179,198. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20020408
[13] Wang Chungang, Zhang Naiwen, Ma Ping. A SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR CALCULATING ELASTIC DISTORTIONAL BUCKLING STRESS OF CHANNELS WITH COMPLEX EDGE STIFFENERS AND INTERMEDIATE STIFFENERS UNDER AXIAL COMPRESSIVE LOAD [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(05): 116-121. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201405026
[14] Zhang Yakun, Zhu Haitang, Hou Lili. PUNCHING BEHAVIOR OF CONCRETE TWO-WAY SLABS REINFORCED WITH FRP BARS UNDER CONCENTRATED LOADING [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(12): 30-34. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201212008
[15] Wang Weiyong, Dong Yuli, Jiang Baofeng, Chen Jianqiang. INFLUENCE OF STIFFENER AND END-PLATE-DEPTH ON FIRE RESISTANCE OF BEAM-TO-COLUMN SINGLE-SIDED JOINT [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(2): 99-102. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200802026
[16] Deng Jun, Huang Peiyan. EFFECT OF TAPERED END AND SPEW FILLETON INTERFACIAL STRESSES IN BEAMS REINFORCED WITH A CFRP PLATE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(9): 109-112. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200709025
[17] Shen Dejian, Wu Shengxing. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AND SIMULATION ANALYSIS ON CORRODED BARS IN CONCRETE AT THE MARINE CYCLE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(3): 58-62. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200503021
Cited by Periodical cited type(2) 1. 何嘉杰,杨晓华,何嘉沛,彭斯宁. 正六边形蜂窝型空间盒式结构受力性能对比分析. 湖南工业大学学报. 2023(01): 8-15 . 2. 肖同,马克俭,卢亚琴. 加劲板对钢空腹夹层板剪力键剪切性能影响研究. 建筑科学. 2022(03): 18-24 .
Other cited types(2)
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-05 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 2025-03 0 2 4 6 8
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 10.4 % FULLTEXT : 10.4 % META : 85.7 % META : 85.7 % PDF : 3.9 % PDF : 3.9 % FULLTEXT META PDF
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Area Distribution 其他 : 16.9 % 其他 : 16.9 % [] : 1.3 % [] : 1.3 % 北京 : 3.9 % 北京 : 3.9 % 太原 : 1.3 % 太原 : 1.3 % 宁德 : 2.6 % 宁德 : 2.6 % 常德 : 1.3 % 常德 : 1.3 % 张家口 : 7.8 % 张家口 : 7.8 % 昆明 : 1.3 % 昆明 : 1.3 % 晋城 : 1.3 % 晋城 : 1.3 % 朝阳 : 1.3 % 朝阳 : 1.3 % 沈阳 : 1.3 % 沈阳 : 1.3 % 济南 : 1.3 % 济南 : 1.3 % 湖州 : 1.3 % 湖州 : 1.3 % 石家庄 : 1.3 % 石家庄 : 1.3 % 芒廷维尤 : 26.0 % 芒廷维尤 : 26.0 % 西宁 : 7.8 % 西宁 : 7.8 % 贵阳 : 2.6 % 贵阳 : 2.6 % 运城 : 13.0 % 运城 : 13.0 % 邯郸 : 1.3 % 邯郸 : 1.3 % 重庆 : 2.6 % 重庆 : 2.6 % 长沙 : 2.6 % 长沙 : 2.6 % 其他 [] 北京 太原 宁德 常德 张家口 昆明 晋城 朝阳 沈阳 济南 湖州 石家庄 芒廷维尤 西宁 贵阳 运城 邯郸 重庆 长沙