COMPARATIVE ANANLYSIS OF SHEAR CAPACITY FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS

Wang Zheng; Shi Qingxuan

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz201307024

Volume 43 Issue 7

Dec. 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2013 > 43(7): 105-109,138

Wang Zheng, Shi Qingxuan. COMPARATIVE ANANLYSIS OF SHEAR CAPACITY FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(7): 105-109,138. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201307024

Citation:

Wang Zheng, Shi Qingxuan. COMPARATIVE ANANLYSIS OF SHEAR CAPACITY FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(7): 105-109,138. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201307024

Wang Zheng, Shi Qingxuan. COMPARATIVE ANANLYSIS OF SHEAR CAPACITY FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(7): 105-109,138. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201307024

Citation:

Wang Zheng, Shi Qingxuan. COMPARATIVE ANANLYSIS OF SHEAR CAPACITY FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(7): 105-109,138. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201307024

PDF( 0 KB)

COMPARATIVE ANANLYSIS OF SHEAR CAPACITY FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201307024

1.
1. Department of Civil Engineering,Xi’an Railway Vocational and Technical Institute,Xi’an 710600,China;
2.
2. School of Civil Engineering,Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology,Xi’an 710055,China

Received Date: 2012-05-28
Publish Date: 2013-07-20

Abstract

Abstract

A comparison of shear capacity calculation method of non-prestressed reinforced concrete beams with stirrups was carried out among GB 50010-2010, ACI318M-08 and EN1992-1-1:2004.The effects of the concrete strength, shear-span ratio, longitudinal reinforcement ratio on the shear strength were also studied.According to domestic and internationa 219 experimental results under pointload of the shear capacity of simply supported reinforced concrete beams, the calculation and experimental values of the standard shear capacity are compared and analysed among different countries.The minimum or maximum stirrup ratios were comparatively analyzed.The results show that shear capacity for reinforced concrete beams with stirrups designed according to European code is greater than Chinese code, but ACI code is the smallest.For the minimum ratios of stirrups, European code is greater than Chinese code and ACI code, ACI code is the smallest.According to the comparison, it is indicated that there are some unreasonable problems for shear capacity calculation in Chinese code, and the modification should be further adopted.
- reinforced concrete beam,
- shear capacity,
- comparative analysis,
- maximum ratio of reinforcement,
- minimum ratio of reinforcement

FullText(HTML)

References(9)

References

[2] ACI 318M －08 Building Code Requirements for Structural?Concrete and Commentary[S].

GB 500102010混凝土结构设计规范[S].

[3] EN 1992－1－1.Euro-code 2: Design of concrete structures Part 1－1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings[S].

[4] 贡金鑫,魏巍巍,胡家顺.中美欧混凝土结构设计[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007:380－390.

[5] Kang Su Kim.Shear Behavior Of Reinforced Concrete Beams and?Prestressed Concrete Beams[D].Doctoral dissertation of University?of Illinois at Urbana Champaign,2004.

[6] 中国建筑科学研究院.钢筋混凝土构件试验数据集--85年设计规范背景资料续编[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1985:42－45.

[7] 李进.高强箍筋混凝土梁受剪性能研究及有限元分析[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2008.

[8] 田磊,贡金鑫,魏巍巍.国内外钢筋混凝土构件受剪承载力可靠度的对比分析[J].工业建筑,2010,40(8):132－138.

[9] 福原正志,黑正清治.鉄筋コンクリ一ト部材にぉけゐ高强度せん断補強筋補強効果に関すゐ実験研究[J].日本建築学会論文報告集,1982.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views