Tong Genshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 108-114. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305023
Citation:
Tong Genshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 108-114. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305023
Tong Genshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 108-114. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305023
Citation:
Tong Genshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 108-114. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305023
COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)
System performance factors for base shear determination in various codes were analyzed.In the USA, it includes overstrength factors of both the material and the structural system and the ductility, in EC 8 it contains the structural overstrength and the ductility, in Japan and China, it reflects only the ductility.Because in Japan a load factor of 1.4 is introduced, it has the biggest earthquake forces for structural design.This paper provided also detailed comments on the relations between the drift under the design seismic action and the drift under medium earthquake, and it is found that the formula in EC 8 is in consistent with its philosophy for determining its seismic action, but not without any problem.A new derivation is presented for the relation between the elastic-plastic drift and the elastic drift under design earthquake.
[4] European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 8: Design of?Structures for Earthquake Resistance[S]. Brussels: CEN,2003.
[5] Building Seismic Safety Council. FEMA450( NEHRP ),Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New?Buildings and Other Structures Part 1: Provisions[S]. Washington?D C : Building Seismic Safety Council,National Institute of?Building Sciences,2003.
[6] 日本建筑中心.建筑物的构造规定-建筑基准法施行令第3章的解说与运用[M].1997.
[7] Miranda E. Evaluation of Site-Dependent Inelastic Seismic Design?Spectra[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,1993,119(5):1319-1338.
[8] Tong Genshu,Huang Jinqiao. Seismic Force Modification Factor?for Ductile Structures[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science,2005,16 A(8):813-825.
[11] Jorge R G,Miranda E. Inelastic Displacement Ratios for?Evaluation of Structures Built on Soft Soil Sites[J]. Earthquake?Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2006,35(6):679-694.
[12] Uang C M,Maarouf A. Deflection Amplification Factor for Seismic?Design Provisions[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,1994,120(8):2423-2436.
Tong Genshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 108-114. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305023
Tong Genshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(2)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(5): 108-114. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201305023