Tong Gengshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 139-143,174. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304029
Citation:
Tong Gengshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 139-143,174. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304029
Tong Gengshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 139-143,174. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304029
Citation:
Tong Gengshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 139-143,174. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304029
COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)
Comparison of drift limitations in codes and their recommendations for seismic design of building structures in China, Japan, Europe and USA was carried out.It is found through the comparison that there are drift limitations of four levels: the serviceability requirement of the return period of 8~95 years, design seismic action level, medium and strong earthquake level.The design philosophies in different codes have great differences, these are avoiding interfering the use of facilities, confining the damage to the partition wall, avoiding crack in concrete members and life save in medium and/or strong earthquake.China has the stringent requirements for the reinforced concrete structures.
[2] International Code Council. Uniform Building Code 1997[S]. California: International Conference of Building Officials,1997.
European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance[S]. Brussels: CEN,2003.
[3] Seismology Committee of Structural Engineers Association of California. SEAOC Blue Book, Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary[S]. Sacramento, California: SEAOC ,1996.
[4] Building Seismic Safety Council. FEMA450(NEHRP ). Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures Part 1: Provisions[S]. Washington, D C : Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences,2003.
[10] Miranda E. Evaluation of Site-Dependent Inelastic Seismic Design Spectra[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,1993,119(5):1319-1338.
[11] Tong Genshu, Huang Jinqiao. Seismic Force Modification Factor for Ductile Structures[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science,2005,16 A(8):813-825.
Tong Gengshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 139-143,174. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304029
Tong Gengshu, Zhou Weidong, Zhang Lei. COMPARISON OF SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES AND A NEW DERIVATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN DRIFTS FOR DESIGN LEVEL AND MEDIUM EARTHQUAKES(1)[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(4): 139-143,174. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201304029