Wang Chunwu, Meng Shaoping. ANALYSIS OF LATERAL RESTRAINTS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(8): 47-50. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200708013
Citation:
Zhao Dong, Zhang Chenghua, Huang Wei, Zhang Wenyin. ULTIMATE CAPACITY ANALYSIS OF ECO-COMPOSITE WALL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2012, 42(11): 56-59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201211013
Wang Chunwu, Meng Shaoping. ANALYSIS OF LATERAL RESTRAINTS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(8): 47-50. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200708013
Citation:
Zhao Dong, Zhang Chenghua, Huang Wei, Zhang Wenyin. ULTIMATE CAPACITY ANALYSIS OF ECO-COMPOSITE WALL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2012, 42(11): 56-59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201211013
ULTIMATE CAPACITY ANALYSIS OF ECO-COMPOSITE WALL
1.
1. Xi'an Univ.of Arch.&Tech.,Xi'an 710055,China;
2.
2. Financial Department of Shaanxi Province,Xi'an 710002,China
Rev Recd Date:
2011-05-12
Publish Date:
2012-11-20
Abstract
Eco-composite wall acting as the main bearing member of an eco-composite wall structure is consisted of concealed frame and eco-composite slab.The ultimate capacity analysis of eco-composite wall is the main contents of the analysis of the structural ultimate bearing capacity and seismic performance evaluation.According to the mechanical behavior and failure process of the wall,shear resistant mechanism of eco-composite wall under limit state of bearing capacity was proposed.The calculating equations for ultimate strength were provided from shear resistant mechanism and equilibrium conditions,and at the same time it was analyzed the ultimate bearing capacity of the preliminary research walls.Theoretical researches and experimental analysis show that the model can better reflect the ultimate strength properties of the ecological composite wall,can be applied to check the ultimate strength under different load conditions of the ecological composite wall.
References
[2] 陈国新,黄炜,姚谦峰,等.基于统一强度理论的生态复合墙体等效斜压杆宽度计算[J].工程力学,2010,27(2): 90-95.
黄炜,张程华,姚谦峰,等.密肋壁板结构简化计算模型对比分析[J].振动与冲击,2009,28(7): 187-191.
[3] 孙静,姚谦峰.密肋复合墙体复合材料等效弹性板模型研究[J].大连理工大学学报,2009,49(3): 427-431.
[4] 季静,韩小雷,郑宜,等.基于能力设计原理的双肢剪力墙极限承载力研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,26(4): 114 -120.
[5] 陈国栋,郭彦林.十字加劲钢板剪力墙的抗剪极限承载力[J].建筑结构学报,2004,25(1): 71-78.
[6] 黄双华,黄雄军.劲性混凝土带边框低剪力墙极限承载力的计算[J].西南交通大学学报,2001,36(4): 360-364.
[7] 姚谦峰,黄炜,田洁,等.密肋复合墙体受力机理及抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2004,25(6): 67-74.
[8] Makoto Mochizuki,Norikazu Onozato,Masao Takehara,et al.Analytical Accuracy of Maximum Strengths of Reinforced Concrete Framed Shear Walls by Macroscopic Models [J].Concrete Research and Technology,JCI,2003,14(2): 11-21.
[9] 张大长,陈怀亮,卢中强.基于抗剪抵抗机构的无开洞RC 剪力墙的极限承载力分析模型的探讨[J].工程力学,2007(7):142-147.
[10] 张大长,陈怀亮,卢中强.基于抗剪抵抗机构的RC 开洞剪力墙极限承载力分析[J].土木工程学报,2008,41(11): 44-49.黄炜,姚谦峰,章宇明,等.内填砌块的密肋复合墙体极限承载力计算[J].土木工程学报,2006,39(3):68-75.
[11] Salonikios T N,Kappos A J,Tegos I A.Cyclic Loadbehavior of Low-Slenderness Reinforced Concrete walls: Failure Modes.Strength and Deformation Analysis,and Design Implication[J].ACI Structure Journal,2000,97(1): 132-141.
[12] Christian Greifenhagen,Pierino Lestuzzi.Static Cyclic Tests on Lightly Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls [J].Engineering Structures,2005,27(11): 1703-1712.
[13] Salonikios T N,Kappos A J,Tegos I A.Cyclic Load Behavior of Low-Slenderness Reinforced Concrete Walls: Design Basis and Test Results[J].ACI Structure Journal,1999,96(4): 649-660.
Relative Articles
[1] REN Zhen, KOU Juntao, WANG Yu, CHI Miaomiao. Research on the Regeneration Design of Industrial Remain Sites from the Perspective of Landscape Urbanism: A Case Study of the Old Brewery in Pingyuan County [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(10): 17-22. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22062304
[2] YE Jinxin, HE Wenfang, LIU Jiaping. A Thermal Shielding Model and Shading Optimization Design for Vernacular Buildings in Extreme Arid Climate Areas [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(7): 7-15,31. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22020705
[3] ZHANG Hongbo, YANG Yujia. Deconstructive Study on Public Space of Jinjiang Timber Cabin Village in Jilin Based on the Pattern Language [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(7): 64-73. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22060804
[4] LIANG Rui, LIANG Zhicheng, JINAG Haiyan, QIU Yunye. RESEARCH ON PUBLICNESS EVALUATION OF BUILDING ATTACHED OPEN SPACES IN HIGH-DENSITY BLOCKES [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(8): 39-44. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21022002
[5] CHEN, Gong, XIE. MICRO RENEWAL OF PUBLIC SPACE IN OLD COMMUNITIES BASED ON SHARING CONCEPT [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 80-83,90. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001014
[6] CHEN Jing, HAO Xinyi, YANG Li. STUDY ON THE SPATIAL FORM OF SILO-CAVE VILLAGE IN THE WEST OF HENAN [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 8-12. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005002
[9] Sun Jian, Zhao Lin. THE RENOVATION OF QINGDAO SMALL HARBOR [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(1): 156-159. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201301035
[10] Ren Huaixin, Yang Weijü. ECO-DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND DESIGN STRATEGIES OF LARGE SPACE PUBLIC BUILDINGS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(2): 23-26,9. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201202006
[11] Wang Xixi, Chen Xingzhu. RESUSCITATION OF THE HEART OF CITY:RENOVATION OF LES HALLES,PARIS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(3): 56-59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201203011
[12] Wang Lu, Xu Jia, Tuo Wanyong, Li Yuhua. ANALYSIS OF PLANNING AND SIGHT DESIGN FOR GANGHUA GARDEN [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(11): 45-48. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201211010
[13] Dong Jie, Su Jihong, Wang Shiyang, Zou Dan. CONSTRUCTION STRATEGY OF CONTEMPOARY INDUSTRIAL PARKS BASED ON VITALITY MOULDING [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(8): 4-7. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201108002
[14] He Wei. RESEARCH AND INTEGRATION DESIGN OF OLD AND NEW CAMPUS PUBLIC SPACE IN HUNAN UNIVERSITY [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(5): 47-49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201105011
[15] Zhou Dongliang, Chi Xiaoyan. AN INITIAL STUDY ON DESIGN OF INNER PUBLIC SPACE OF OFFICIAL BUILDINGS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(3): 23-25. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200903008
[16] Zhang Ping, Chen Zhilong, Li Juxi. STUDY ON THE DESIGN OF MUSEUM ARCHITECTURE OF YANG LING OF THE HAN DYNASTY RELICS OF UNDERGROUND [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(7): 120-123. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200807030
[17] Wang Yi, Chen Jing. THE EXPLORATION AND PRACTICE OF INDUSTRIAL PARKS UNDER THE CONCEPTION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(12): 37-40. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200812011
[18] Shi Qi-lei. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL BUILDING FOR THE PLAcS NO. 306 HOSPITAL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(10): 29-31. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200610009
[19] Zhang Sanming, Wu Qian. RECONSTRUCTION DESIGN OF ACOUSTICAL ENVIRONMENT OF INTERIOR PUBLIC SPACE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(2): 31-33. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200602009
[20] Chen Zhihua, Li Yang, Shi Jie. APPLICATION STUDY ON THE SPATIAL CURVE TAPERED BOX GIRDER FOR TIANJIN MUSEUM [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(12): 75-77. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200512020
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-04 2024-05 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 20.7 % FULLTEXT : 20.7 % META : 77.8 % META : 77.8 % PDF : 1.5 % PDF : 1.5 % FULLTEXT META PDF
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Area Distribution 其他 : 8.1 % 其他 : 8.1 % China : 4.0 % China : 4.0 % 上海 : 0.7 % 上海 : 0.7 % 保定 : 0.7 % 保定 : 0.7 % 北京 : 8.7 % 北京 : 8.7 % 十堰 : 0.7 % 十堰 : 0.7 % 南昌 : 0.7 % 南昌 : 0.7 % 南通 : 0.7 % 南通 : 0.7 % 台州 : 0.7 % 台州 : 0.7 % 天津 : 2.0 % 天津 : 2.0 % 太原 : 2.0 % 太原 : 2.0 % 常州 : 0.7 % 常州 : 0.7 % 常德 : 0.7 % 常德 : 0.7 % 张家口 : 2.7 % 张家口 : 2.7 % 晋城 : 0.7 % 晋城 : 0.7 % 朝阳 : 0.7 % 朝阳 : 0.7 % 武汉 : 2.7 % 武汉 : 2.7 % 济南 : 0.7 % 济南 : 0.7 % 湖州 : 1.3 % 湖州 : 1.3 % 漯河 : 1.3 % 漯河 : 1.3 % 濮阳 : 0.7 % 濮阳 : 0.7 % 芒廷维尤 : 18.8 % 芒廷维尤 : 18.8 % 芝加哥 : 0.7 % 芝加哥 : 0.7 % 西宁 : 22.1 % 西宁 : 22.1 % 西安 : 1.3 % 西安 : 1.3 % 贵阳 : 0.7 % 贵阳 : 0.7 % 运城 : 10.1 % 运城 : 10.1 % 邯郸 : 0.7 % 邯郸 : 0.7 % 郑州 : 2.7 % 郑州 : 2.7 % 重庆 : 0.7 % 重庆 : 0.7 % 长沙 : 1.3 % 长沙 : 1.3 % 其他 China 上海 保定 北京 十堰 南昌 南通 台州 天津 太原 常州 常德 张家口 晋城 朝阳 武汉 济南 湖州 漯河 濮阳 芒廷维尤 芝加哥 西宁 西安 贵阳 运城 邯郸 郑州 重庆 长沙