OPTIMIZATION ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION METHOD FOR SHALLOW-BURIED TUNNEL WITH LARGE SECTION

Wu Zhanrui; Qi Taiyue; Tang Jincai

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz201208022

Volume 42 Issue 8

Dec. 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2012 > 42(8): 102-107

Wu Zhanrui, Qi Taiyue, Tang Jincai. OPTIMIZATION ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION METHOD FOR SHALLOW-BURIED TUNNEL WITH LARGE SECTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(8): 102-107. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201208022

Citation:

Wu Zhanrui, Qi Taiyue, Tang Jincai. OPTIMIZATION ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION METHOD FOR SHALLOW-BURIED TUNNEL WITH LARGE SECTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(8): 102-107. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201208022

Citation:

PDF( 0 KB)

OPTIMIZATION ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION METHOD FOR SHALLOW-BURIED TUNNEL WITH LARGE SECTION

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201208022

1.
School of Civil Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China

Received Date: 2012-02-27
Publish Date: 2012-08-20

Abstract

Abstract

In order to find the most reasonable construction method for the Qingdao Jiaozhou Bay subsea tunnel withlarge section in land area, numerical simulation for the four kinds of common construction methods had been made bythree-dimension finite differential software FLAC3 D．The analytical results indicate that the double side headingmethod is better in the surface settlement, tunnel deformation and stability of surrounding rock than the other threemethods．The DC construction method is more beneficial to the lining safety than the others．In the actual process ofconstruction, it should be comprehensively considered lots of the factors including the construction period, schedule, tunnel depth, tunnel diameter and so on in the selection of construction method．It' s difficult to install the steelsupport because of the big span, high clearance and bench in Qingdao subsea tunnel with large section in land area．The CD method should not be used in the construction and the double side heading method is the best selection takinginto account all the factors．The double side heading method has achieved significant social and economic benefits inthe Qingdao Jiaozhou Bay subsea tunnel with large section in land area and will play a very good reference andguidance for similar projects in the future．
- subsea tunnel,
- construction method,
- optimization analysis,
- numerical calculation,
- large section tunnel

FullText(HTML)

References(12)

References

姚直书,蔡海兵,程桦,等.采用长距离水平冻结暗挖法的浅埋大断面地铁隧道施工技术[J].中国铁道科学,2011,32(1):75-80.

[2] 唐国荣,刘招伟,李建华.城市富水砂卵石地层大断面隧道浅埋暗挖工法研究[J].中国工程科学,2010,12(12):98-102.

[3] 黄明利,路威,徐恒国,等.大断面海底隧道软弱地层施工方法研究[J].中国工程科学,2009,11(7):35-38.

[4] 关宝树.隧道工程设计要点集[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003.

[5] 魏纲.盾构隧道深层土体沉降槽宽度系数计算方法研究[J].公路交通科技,2010,27(4):110-115.

[6] 魏纲.盾构法隧道地面沉降槽宽度系数取值的研究[J].工业建筑,2009,39(12):74-79.

[7] 唐军峰,徐国元,唐雪梅,等.复杂开挖条件下大断面洞室围岩的变形及力学特性研究[J].地质力学学报,2009,15(3):233-244.

[8] 王明年,路军富,张建国,等.大断面海底隧道施工安全判定基准及应用[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(6):867-873.

[9] 喻言,柳群义,冯德山.隧道岩体稳定性的非线性单元安全系数分析[J].中南大学学报,2010,41(3):1085-1089.

[10] 舒谷生,彭文祥,何忠明,等.岩体稳定性评价的单元安全系数法及其影响因素分析[J].科技导报,2009,27(16):66-68.

[11] 邵冠慧,李晓昭,赵晓豹,等.基于块体理论安全系数的隧道优化设计[J].工程地质学报,2010,18(4):581-585.

[12] 宋战平,荆敏,韩日美,等.基于强度安全系数概念的隧道衬砌结构优选设计[J].西安建筑科技大学学报,2010,42(4):499-503.

Relative Articles

[1]	SONG Chenghao, CHEN Shucheng, HU Xiaobin, YUAN Huanxin. Crack Monitoring of RC Columns Under Cyclic Loading Based on Computer Vision[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(10): 53-60. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22070112
[2]	LI Ganggang, ZHAO Jun. SEISMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF HYBRID FRP-STEEL-REINFORCED CONCRETEL SHEAR WALLS SUBJECTED TO CYCLIC LOADS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(10): 180-186,75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201904140005
[3]	Wang Peng, Shi Qingxuan, Wang Feng, Wang Qiuwei, Zheng Xiaolong, Wang Bin. STUDY OF MODE OF ENERGY DISSIPATION AND DAMAGE OF SRC FRAME-RC CORE WALL STRUCTURES UNDER STRONG EARTHQUAKE ACTIONS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(8): 91-98. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201508017
[4]	Hao Tingyu, Wang Fujiang, Wu Zhigang, Wu Huifen. DETERIORATION AND DURABILITY DECREASE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE WORKSHOP STRUCTURES BY DIFFERENT INDUSTRIAL MEDIA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(6): 36-39,59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201006009
[5]	Liu Changhong, Liang Xingwen. SHEAR STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS WITHOUT WEB REINFORCEMENT UNDER CONCENTRATED LOAD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(8): 89-91. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200808023
[6]	Lin Shizhu, . ANALYSIS OF LIFE OF IN-SERVICE REINFORCED CONCRETE SINGLE-STOREY INDUSTRIAL MILL BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO EARTHQUAKE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(11): 67-71,108. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200611017
[7]	Liu Qingyang, Xu Xiangdong, Cui Qingha, i Zhao Kaozhong, Zhang Xin. THE ACIDIFICATION CORROSION (VITRIOL)OF REINFORCED CONCRETE PROVISION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(3): 93-94.
[8]	Huang Pengfei, Bao Yiwang, Yao Yan. DAMAGES OF REINFORCED CONCRETE UNDER SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS OF CYCLIC FREEZE-THAW, DEICING-SALT ATTACK, REBAR CORROSION AND BENDING LOAD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(5): 63-67. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200505017
[9]	Chen Liuguo, Fang Congqi, Kou Xinjian, Chen Bing. BOND PROPERTY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE WITH CORRODED REINFORCEMENT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(5): 15-17. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200405005
[10]	Jiang Xiaojing, Song Xiaobing, Wang Wei. EFFECT OF AMBIENT TEMPERATURE ON CORROSION OF REINFORCEMENT IN REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(5): 11-14. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200405004
[11]	Jiao Junting, Ye Yinghua, Diao Bo, Yu Linchong. NONLINEAR ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE MEMBERS WITH IRREGULAR SHAPE SECTIONS SUBJECTED TO BIECCENTRIC COMPRESSION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(2): 33-36. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200402011
[12]	Zhang Yuhui, Zhao Zhonghu, Ju Yang. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF COLLAPSE OF RC FRAME UNDER EARTHQUAKE LOADS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(3): 57-61,79. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200403018