RESEARCH ON EARTH PRESSURE CONSIDERING DISPLACEMENT AND SOIL ARCHING

Lu Kunlin; Zhu Dayong; Yang Yang

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz201105020

Volume 41 Issue 5

Dec. 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2011 > 41(5): 88-92

Lu Kunlin, Zhu Dayong, Yang Yang. RESEARCH ON EARTH PRESSURE CONSIDERING DISPLACEMENT AND SOIL ARCHING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(5): 88-92. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201105020

Citation:

Lu Kunlin, Zhu Dayong, Yang Yang. RESEARCH ON EARTH PRESSURE CONSIDERING DISPLACEMENT AND SOIL ARCHING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(5): 88-92. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201105020

Lu Kunlin, Zhu Dayong, Yang Yang. RESEARCH ON EARTH PRESSURE CONSIDERING DISPLACEMENT AND SOIL ARCHING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(5): 88-92. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201105020

Citation:

Lu Kunlin, Zhu Dayong, Yang Yang. RESEARCH ON EARTH PRESSURE CONSIDERING DISPLACEMENT AND SOIL ARCHING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(5): 88-92. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201105020

PDF( 0 KB)

RESEARCH ON EARTH PRESSURE CONSIDERING DISPLACEMENT AND SOIL ARCHING

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201105020

1.
School of Civil Engineering,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China

Received Date: 2010-11-29
Publish Date: 2011-05-20

Abstract

Abstract

A calculation method of earth pressure on the retaining wall of different movement models was proposed by taking the soil arching and wall's displacement into account.The relationship between the internal and external friction angle and coefficient of lateral earth pressure were incorporated into the horizontal layer analysis to derive the theoretic formulae of the active and passive earth pressures, the calculated results were compared with those of the test models.It is found that the calculation results are basically consistent with the ones of six models, with the active condition being better than the passive condition and the passive earth pressure of the movement model of rotation about bottom(RB) having the largest error.In general, the present method was taken into overall account the influences of wall movement and soil arching on the distribution of earth pressure.
- retaining wall,
- earth pressure,
- soil arching,
- displacement

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[2] Fang Y S, Chen T J, Wu B F. Passive Earth Pressures with?Various Wall Movements[J]. Journal of Geotechnical?Engineering, ASCE,1994,120(8):1307-1323.

Fang Y S, Ishibashi I. Static Earth Pressures with Various Wall?Movements[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE,1986,112(3):317-333.

[3] 徐日庆,陈页开,杨仲轩,等.刚性挡墙被动土压力模型试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2002,24(5):569-575.

[4] Matsuo M, Kenmochi S, Yagi H. Experimental Study on Earth?Pressure of Retaining Wall by Field Tests [J]. Soils and?Foundations,1978,18(3):27-41.

[5] 岳祖润,彭胤宗,张师德.压实黏性填土挡土墙土压力离心模型试验[J].岩土工程学报,1992,14(6):90-96.

[6] 徐日庆.考虑位移和时间的土压力计算方法[J].浙江大学学报:工学版,2000,34(4):370-375.

[7] 梅国雄,宰金珉.考虑位移影响的土压力近似计算方法[J].岩土力学,2001,22(1):83-85.

[8] Bang S. Active Earth Pressure Behind Retaining Walls[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , ASCE,1985,111(3):407-412.

[9] Handy R L. Arch in Soil Arching[J]. Journal of Geotechnical?Engineering, ASCE,1985,111(3):302-318.

[10] 蒋波,应宏伟,谢康和.挡土墙后土体拱效应分析[J].浙江大学学报:工学版,2005,39(1):131-136.

[11] Paik K H, Salgado R. Estimation of Active Earth Pressure Against?Rigid Retaining Walls Considering Arching Effects [J]. Geotechnique,2003,53(7):643-653.

[12] 应宏伟,蒋波,谢康和.考虑土拱效应的挡土墙主动土压力分布[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(5):717-722.

[13] 章瑞文,徐日庆.土拱效应原理求解挡土墙土压力方法的改进[J].岩土力学,2008,29(4):1057-1060.

[14] 徐日庆,龚慈,魏纲,等.考虑平动位移效应的刚性挡土墙土压力理论[J].浙江大学学报:工学版,2005,39(1):119-122.

[15] 蒋波,应宏伟,谢康和,等.平动模式下挡土墙非极限状态主动土压力计算[J].中国公路学报,2005,18(2):24-27.

[16] 彭述权,周健,樊玲,等.考虑土拱效应刚性挡土墙土压力研究[J].岩土力学,2008,29(10):2701-2707.

[17] 卢坤林,朱大勇,杨扬.考虑土拱效应的非极限主动土压力计算方法[J].中国公路学报,2010,23(1):19-25.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views