Yuan Guanglin, Zhang Xianyang, Zhou Ximao, Yue Peng. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF SANDWICH BEAM IN MASONRY STRUCTURE TRANSFORMATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 8-12. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908003
Citation:
Yuan Guanglin, Zhang Xianyang, Zhou Ximao, Yue Peng. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF SANDWICH BEAM IN MASONRY STRUCTURE TRANSFORMATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2009, 39(8): 8-12. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908003
Yuan Guanglin, Zhang Xianyang, Zhou Ximao, Yue Peng. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF SANDWICH BEAM IN MASONRY STRUCTURE TRANSFORMATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 8-12. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908003
Citation:
Yuan Guanglin, Zhang Xianyang, Zhou Ximao, Yue Peng. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF SANDWICH BEAM IN MASONRY STRUCTURE TRANSFORMATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2009, 39(8): 8-12. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908003
RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF SANDWICH BEAM IN MASONRY STRUCTURE TRANSFORMATION
1.
1. Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221008,China;
2.
2. Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Xi’an University of Science and Technology,Xi’an 710054,China
Received Date: 2009-03-20
Publish Date:
2009-08-20
Abstract
Mechanical properties of two kinds of sandwich beams were tested.The geometric parameters and the ratio of longitudinal bar of the beams were the same,but the types of connections were different.The result indicated that the failure mode,crack shape and development law,ultimate load,and curve of load-deflection were the same as that of the whole poured beam,which had the equal ratio of longitudinal bar.Longitudinal bar played an important role to resist the loads in sandwich beam,while the link steel bar and pin key steel bar did not lend much support to resist the loads.What the link steel bar and pin key steel bar done was that they made the brick wall and concrete beam work together,whose deflections were the same.
References
[2] 贺大勇.砖混结构改造中墙梁托换技术的新方法[J].中外建筑,2004(2):189-190;
贾强.砖混结构建筑物墙体托换的加固设计[J].四川建筑科学研究,2005,31(5):68-69;
[3] 徐长雄.多层砖混建筑的托梁换墙改造[J].冶金矿山设计与建设,1997,29(1):38-42;
[4] 程远兵,王三会.两种简易可行的墙砖托换梁[J].四川建筑科学研究,2005,31(4):44-47;
[5] 王琦,刘敏雄.砖混结构中的托梁拆墙改造[J].浙江建筑,2001,104(1):22-23;
[6] 金向前,刘军进,张崴,等.砖砌体房屋抽墙加固方案[J].建筑结构,2004,32(4):52-53;
[7] 甘宜山,林琳.砖混结构房屋改造中的拆墙换梁技术[J].湘潭大学自然科学学报,2000,22(2):96-98.
Relative Articles
Cited by Periodical cited type(10) 1. 郎圣淳,严晓东. 带肋钢筋套筒灌浆连接破坏过程的有限元分析. 宁波大学学报(理工版). 2025(01): 37-44 . 2. 鲍佳文,高强,唐林,赵唯坚. 钢筋套筒灌浆连接拉伸性能的精细有限元分析. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2023(04): 814-823 . 3. 陈胜. 考虑端部缺陷的装配式建筑灌浆套筒力学特性研究. 福建建材. 2023(05): 4-7 . 4. 张林捷. 装配式混凝土结构节点的连接方式研究. 住宅与房地产. 2023(32): 86-88 . 5. Hongtao Liu,Pengchao Kong,Zuohu Wang,Weizhang Liao. Research on the influence of grouted sleeves and assembled seams on the deformation and bearing capacity of compression-flexure member. Earthquake Research Advances. 2022(04): 46-52 . 6. 卓旬,刘庆辉,徐艳红,徐梓豪,王会乾,高谦. 装配式混凝土结构连接节点研究综述. 混凝土. 2022(12): 155-162+167 . 7. 胡晓依. 新型超高强钢筋连接套筒的性能试验与研究. 建筑施工. 2021(02): 299-302 . 8. 李智斌,赵杰,邵康节,吴广彬. 我国钢筋机械连接与锚固技术实践与展望. 施工技术. 2021(09): 4-7 . 9. 詹霖伟. 装配整体式混凝土结构钢筋连接技术研究进展探析. 福建建筑. 2021(07): 76-81 . 10. 赵军,周子翔,朱银红. 大直径无缝钢管全灌浆套筒的力学性能. 济南大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(06): 593-597+613 .
Other cited types(15)
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-04 2024-05 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 0 1 2 3 4
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 11.4 % FULLTEXT : 11.4 % META : 88.6 % META : 88.6 % FULLTEXT META
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Area Distribution 其他 : 12.3 % 其他 : 12.3 % 北京 : 7.0 % 北京 : 7.0 % 南京 : 1.8 % 南京 : 1.8 % 南通 : 1.8 % 南通 : 1.8 % 嘉兴 : 1.8 % 嘉兴 : 1.8 % 天津 : 1.8 % 天津 : 1.8 % 张家口 : 12.3 % 张家口 : 12.3 % 徐州 : 1.8 % 徐州 : 1.8 % 成都 : 3.5 % 成都 : 3.5 % 扬州 : 3.5 % 扬州 : 3.5 % 朝阳 : 1.8 % 朝阳 : 1.8 % 汉中 : 1.8 % 汉中 : 1.8 % 漯河 : 3.5 % 漯河 : 3.5 % 芒廷维尤 : 17.5 % 芒廷维尤 : 17.5 % 芝加哥 : 5.3 % 芝加哥 : 5.3 % 西宁 : 12.3 % 西宁 : 12.3 % 西安 : 5.3 % 西安 : 5.3 % 郑州 : 1.8 % 郑州 : 1.8 % 重庆 : 1.8 % 重庆 : 1.8 % 长沙 : 1.8 % 长沙 : 1.8 % 其他 北京 南京 南通 嘉兴 天津 张家口 徐州 成都 扬州 朝阳 汉中 漯河 芒廷维尤 芝加哥 西宁 西安 郑州 重庆 长沙