COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SITE CLASSFICATION AND SITE EFFECTS BETWEEN CHINESE CODE GB50011—2001 AND FEMA450

Lu Huaxi; Liang Pingying; Qiu Zaosheng

doi:10.13204/j.gyjz200906019

Volume 39 Issue 6

Dec. 2014

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2009 > 39(6): 79-83

Lu Huaxi, Liang Pingying, Qiu Zaosheng. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SITE CLASSFICATION AND SITE EFFECTS BETWEEN CHINESE CODE GB50011—2001 AND FEMA450[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(6): 79-83. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200906019

Citation:

Lu Huaxi, Liang Pingying, Qiu Zaosheng. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SITE CLASSFICATION AND SITE EFFECTS BETWEEN CHINESE CODE GB50011—2001 AND FEMA450[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(6): 79-83. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200906019

Citation:

PDF( 0 KB)

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SITE CLASSFICATION AND SITE EFFECTS BETWEEN CHINESE CODE GB50011—2001 AND FEMA450

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200906019

1.
School of Civil Engineering,East China Jiaotong University,Nanchang 330013,China

Received Date: 2009-01-12
Publish Date: 2009-06-20

Abstract

Abstract

The difference of site classification and site effects between Chinese Code GB 500112001 and FEMA450 is studied in this paper.Firstly,comparative analysis of site class of ordinary site,site with soft interlayer within 20 m depth and site with soft soil layer below 20m depth is presented,it is found that the thickness of soft soil layer is more vulnerable to change site class of FEMA450 than that of GB500112001 for site with soft interlayer within 20 m depth,and more careful to be considered in FEMA450 for site with soft soil layer below 20m depth.Then,the response spectrums at all sites under different ground shaking are compared,and the results indicate that the effects of soil conditions on ground motion characteristics is more reasonable to be considered in FEMA450 than that in GB500112001.
- seismic design,
- site classification,
- site effects,
- comparison

FullText(HTML)

References(8)

References

[2] 郭明珠,陈厚群.场地类别划分与抗震设计反应谱的讨论[J].世界地震工程,2003,19(2):108-111;

薄景山,翟庆生,刘红帅,等.场地分类及其在我国的演变[J].自然灾害学报,2004,13(3):44-49;

[3] 薄景山,李秀领,李山有.场地条件对地震动影响研究的若干进展[J].世界地震工程,2003,19(2):11-15;

[4] 赵艳,郭明珠,吴焕娟,等.关于改进我国抗震设计反应谱的探讨[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,26(3):47-50;

[5] 罗开海.建筑抗震设防标准和性能设计方法研究:中美欧抗震设计规范比较分析[R].北京:中国建筑科学研究院,2005;

[6] GB 50011-2001建筑抗震设计规范[S];

[7] Building Seismic Safety Council,Federal Emergency ManagementAgency,National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program.NEHRPRecommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings andOther Structures(FEMA450),Part 1:Provisions,(2003 ed)[S].Washington D C:Building Seismic Safety Council,2004;

[8] Building Seismic Safety Council,Federal Emergency ManagementAgency,National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program.NEHRPRecommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings andOther Structures(FEMA450),Part 2:Commentary,(2003 ed)[S].Washington D C:Building Seismic Safety Council,2004.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views