CHEN, Gong, XIE. MICRO RENEWAL OF PUBLIC SPACE IN OLD COMMUNITIES BASED ON SHARING CONCEPT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 80-83,90. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001014
Citation:
Li XuPing. LONG-TERM MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2008, 38(10): 80-84. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz20081020
CHEN, Gong, XIE. MICRO RENEWAL OF PUBLIC SPACE IN OLD COMMUNITIES BASED ON SHARING CONCEPT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 80-83,90. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001014
Citation:
Li XuPing. LONG-TERM MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2008, 38(10): 80-84. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz20081020
LONG-TERM MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE
Received Date: 2008-06-15
Publish Date:
2008-10-20
Abstract
The long-term mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete(RAC) are of great importance for insuring the construction quality and safety of buildings made with this material.For this reason,the development of mechanical properties of RAC of different strength grades over time was extensively investigated,mainly including the compressive strength,the tensile splitting strength,the flexural strength and the modulus of elasticity.The changing law of the long-term mechanical properties of RAC was analyzed and the adaptability of the predict method for the long-term mechanical properties of conventional concrete to RAC was evaluated.The test results indicated that the developments of the mechanical properties of RAC over time are different from that of conventional concrete.Higher strength and modulus of elasticity gain were observed for RAC.The predict methods for the long-term mechanical properties of conventional concrete are not suitable for RAC.Based on the test results in this paper,alternative predicting methods for the long-term mechanical properties of were proposed.
References
[2] 肖建庄,李佳彬,兰阳.再生混凝土技术最新研究进展与评述.混凝土,2003(6):17-20
Hanaen,T C.Rocycling of demolished concrete and masonry.London:E FN Spon,1992
[3] 邓寿昌,张学兵,罗迎社.废弃混凝土再生利用的现状分析与研究展望.混凝土,2006(11):20-24
[4] 肖益民,唐凛,鲍传富,等.合宁高速公路水泥混凝土路面再生利用的研究//第四界国际道路和机场路面技术大会论文集.北京:人民交通出版社,2002
[5] 肖建庄,王军龙,孙振平,等.再生粗集料在水泥混凝土路面中的应用研究.公路交通科技,2005,22(9):52-55
[6] 李欣,尹健,再生骨料混凝土在路面修补中的应用.中外公路,2006,26(6):192-195
[7] 施钟毅,李阳.再生混凝土的试验研究与工程应用.粉煤灰,2004(4):3-4
[8] 朱剑锋.新型再生混凝土条板应用实例.中国建材,2006(2):83-84
[9] CEB-FIP.Model code for Concrete Structures:CEB-FIP International Recommendations.Paris:[s.n.],1990
Relative Articles
[1] XUE Qianming, HUANG Yuehao, SHANG Yongtao. Research on Micro-Renewal and Optimization Design of Lanzhou Railway Station Area Under Catalyst Linkage [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(5): 86-94. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23060709
[2] ZHANG Xia, ZHAO Xue, LIAO Zixiang. Application of Affordance Theory to the Community-Based Renewal of Industrial Relics and Strategies: Taking Wuhan City as an Example [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(12): 45-53. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23083006
[3] JIN Liansheng, CHEN Chen. Protection and Renewal Strategies of Santaizi Worker’s Community in Shenyang from a Perspective of Community Co-Governance Systems [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(1): 72-81. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21012706
[4] ZHANG Hongbo, YANG Yujia. Deconstructive Study on Public Space of Jinjiang Timber Cabin Village in Jilin Based on the Pattern Language [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(7): 64-73. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22060804
[5] REN Zhen, KOU Juntao, WANG Yu, CHI Miaomiao. Research on the Regeneration Design of Industrial Remain Sites from the Perspective of Landscape Urbanism: A Case Study of the Old Brewery in Pingyuan County [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(10): 17-22. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22062304
[6] CAO Ying, YANG Jinpeng, WANG Yu, ZHANG Nan. Protection and Reuse of Mining Heritage Based on Community Renewal: Taking the Zhongfu Mining Heritage in Jiaozuo as an Example [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(1): 52-58. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20102504
[7] LYU Chang, WEI Chunyu. TAKING TIANHAN CULTURAL PARK AS AN EXAMPLE: RESEARCH ON THE CURRENT SITUATION AND DESIGN OF CONTEMPORARY VILLAGE MUSEUM [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 74-80. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzg21022003
[8] QIAO Zhi, JIA Xinxin, HUANG Jingfan, FAN Wenlu. STUDY ON THE AGING SPACE ACTIVATION AND FACILITIES RENEWAL OF XI'AN TEXTILE CITY INDUSTRIAL COMMUNITY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF COLLECTIVE MEMORY [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 89-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002013
[9] CHEN Jing, HAO Xinyi, YANG Li. STUDY ON THE SPATIAL FORM OF SILO-CAVE VILLAGE IN THE WEST OF HENAN [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 8-12. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005002
[12] Deng Yuanyuan, Chang Jiang. MICRO SPATIAL COGNITIVE OF INHABITANT IN OLD COMMUNITY: THE INVESTIGATION FOR THE WORKER COMMUNITY OF THE 2ND MACHINERY PLANT IN JIAWANG DISTRICT,XUZHOU [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(05): 40-44.
[13] Sun Jian, Zhao Lin. THE RENOVATION OF QINGDAO SMALL HARBOR [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(1): 156-159. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201301035
[14] Wang Xixi, Chen Xingzhu. RESUSCITATION OF THE HEART OF CITY:RENOVATION OF LES HALLES,PARIS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(3): 56-59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201203011
[15] Wang Lu, Xu Jia, Tuo Wanyong, Li Yuhua. ANALYSIS OF PLANNING AND SIGHT DESIGN FOR GANGHUA GARDEN [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(11): 45-48. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201211010
[16] Dong Jie, Su Jihong, Wang Shiyang, Zou Dan. CONSTRUCTION STRATEGY OF CONTEMPOARY INDUSTRIAL PARKS BASED ON VITALITY MOULDING [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(8): 4-7. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201108002
[17] He Wei. RESEARCH AND INTEGRATION DESIGN OF OLD AND NEW CAMPUS PUBLIC SPACE IN HUNAN UNIVERSITY [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(5): 47-49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201105011
[18] Wang Yi, Chen Jing. THE EXPLORATION AND PRACTICE OF INDUSTRIAL PARKS UNDER THE CONCEPTION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(12): 37-40. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200812011
[19] Shi Qi-lei. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL BUILDING FOR THE PLAcS NO. 306 HOSPITAL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(10): 29-31. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200610009
[20] Zhang Sanming, Wu Qian. RECONSTRUCTION DESIGN OF ACOUSTICAL ENVIRONMENT OF INTERIOR PUBLIC SPACE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(2): 31-33. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200602009
Cited by Periodical cited type(15) 1. 高雅薇,孙伟,官卫华. 基于多主体治理视角的城市更新研究进展与展望. 现代城市研究. 2024(06): 1-7+45 . 2. 余文志豪,孙靓,刘梦昭,姚彧之,蔡祎文. 基于空间激活的武汉保成路社区入口改造. 山西建筑. 2023(07): 39-42 . 3. 王崎. 基于微更新的住区开放空间适老性研究进展及趋势. 低温建筑技术. 2023(04): 30-33 . 4. 张思源. 老旧小区首层自发加建研究——以柳州机车车辆有限公司东社区为例. 城市建筑. 2023(22): 182-185 . 5. 潘博,田从祥,王文斌. 基于“共享”理念下老旧社区公共空间更新探索——以荆州市荆州古城便河社区为例. 四川建材. 2022(02): 51-52+54 . 6. 宋鹏波,孙涛,郑云峰. 基于UCD理念的老旧社区公共空间景观微改造创新设计研究——以武汉市武展社区为例. 中国勘察设计. 2022(09): 87-90 . 7. 陈晓菲,冉圣林,马青松. 大街区视角下城镇老旧小区改造策略研究. 住区. 2022(04): 6-14 . 8. 张恒瑜,张忠峰,赵红霞. 城市微更新背景下基于“共享”理念的老城区公共空间改造. 现代园艺. 2022(21): 95-97 . 9. 陈明晨,李凯怡,何雪倩. 共享养老模式下老旧社区口袋公园的设计探析. 科学技术创新. 2022(36): 155-158 . 10. 宁晓蕾. 共享理念下老旧社区公共空间微更新. 海峡科技与产业. 2022(12): 104-106 . 11. 孟军. 社区微更新视角下南阳老旧社区体育设施优化配置研究. 体育风尚. 2021(02): 132-133 . 12. 凌云. 社区更新中的可持续发展策略研究——以美国纽约为例. 建筑与文化. 2021(06): 58-59 . 13. 黄芸璟,彭震宇. 基于城市闲置空间的智慧共享研究——以重庆市住宅空间为例. 国土资源信息化. 2021(04): 22-27+21 . 14. 吴文勇. 垃圾分类背景下城市公共垃圾桶视觉设计研究. 包装工程. 2021(18): 287-291 . 15. 李馨瞳. 西安市老旧社区微更新改造理念与策略研究. 绿色科技. 2020(18): 199-200+232 .
Other cited types(40)
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-04 2024-05 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 0 5 10 15 20
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 19.0 % FULLTEXT : 19.0 % META : 80.1 % META : 80.1 % PDF : 0.9 % PDF : 0.9 % FULLTEXT META PDF
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Area Distribution 其他 : 3.4 % 其他 : 3.4 % 其他 : 1.2 % 其他 : 1.2 % China : 1.2 % China : 1.2 % Hong Kong, China : 0.9 % Hong Kong, China : 0.9 % [] : 0.6 % [] : 0.6 % 上海 : 2.8 % 上海 : 2.8 % 东莞 : 0.6 % 东莞 : 0.6 % 北京 : 8.9 % 北京 : 8.9 % 南京 : 1.2 % 南京 : 1.2 % 南通 : 0.3 % 南通 : 0.3 % 台州 : 0.6 % 台州 : 0.6 % 合肥 : 0.6 % 合肥 : 0.6 % 嘉兴 : 0.3 % 嘉兴 : 0.3 % 大连 : 1.2 % 大连 : 1.2 % 天津 : 0.6 % 天津 : 0.6 % 太原 : 0.6 % 太原 : 0.6 % 宿州 : 0.3 % 宿州 : 0.3 % 广州 : 0.6 % 广州 : 0.6 % 张家口 : 0.9 % 张家口 : 0.9 % 成都 : 0.9 % 成都 : 0.9 % 扬州 : 0.6 % 扬州 : 0.6 % 晋城 : 0.3 % 晋城 : 0.3 % 朝阳 : 1.2 % 朝阳 : 1.2 % 杭州 : 3.7 % 杭州 : 3.7 % 武汉 : 1.2 % 武汉 : 1.2 % 泰安 : 0.3 % 泰安 : 0.3 % 济南 : 0.3 % 济南 : 0.3 % 济宁 : 0.3 % 济宁 : 0.3 % 温州 : 0.3 % 温州 : 0.3 % 湖州 : 0.9 % 湖州 : 0.9 % 漯河 : 1.2 % 漯河 : 1.2 % 珠海 : 0.3 % 珠海 : 0.3 % 石家庄 : 0.6 % 石家庄 : 0.6 % 福州 : 0.9 % 福州 : 0.9 % 芒廷维尤 : 45.9 % 芒廷维尤 : 45.9 % 荆州 : 0.3 % 荆州 : 0.3 % 菏泽 : 0.3 % 菏泽 : 0.3 % 衢州 : 0.3 % 衢州 : 0.3 % 西宁 : 4.9 % 西宁 : 4.9 % 贵阳 : 0.3 % 贵阳 : 0.3 % 运城 : 2.8 % 运城 : 2.8 % 邯郸 : 0.3 % 邯郸 : 0.3 % 郑州 : 3.1 % 郑州 : 3.1 % 重庆 : 0.3 % 重庆 : 0.3 % 镇江 : 0.3 % 镇江 : 0.3 % 长沙 : 0.6 % 长沙 : 0.6 % 阳泉 : 0.6 % 阳泉 : 0.6 % 其他 其他 China Hong Kong, China [] 上海 东莞 北京 南京 南通 台州 合肥 嘉兴 大连 天津 太原 宿州 广州 张家口 成都 扬州 晋城 朝阳 杭州 武汉 泰安 济南 济宁 温州 湖州 漯河 珠海 石家庄 福州 芒廷维尤 荆州 菏泽 衢州 西宁 贵阳 运城 邯郸 郑州 重庆 镇江 长沙 阳泉