Li Yi, Zhao Wen, Yan Yunqi. METHOD OF CONTINUAL ANALYSIS FOR SYSTEM RELIABILITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(10): 26-28,39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200510009
Citation:
Shi Weihua, Guan Fuling. ANALYSIS OF MEMBRANE STRUCTURES OF TRACK AND FIELD STAND IN ZHEJIANG SPORTS CENTER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2005, 35(6): 71-75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200506021
Li Yi, Zhao Wen, Yan Yunqi. METHOD OF CONTINUAL ANALYSIS FOR SYSTEM RELIABILITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(10): 26-28,39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200510009
Citation:
Shi Weihua, Guan Fuling. ANALYSIS OF MEMBRANE STRUCTURES OF TRACK AND FIELD STAND IN ZHEJIANG SPORTS CENTER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION , 2005, 35(6): 71-75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200506021
ANALYSIS OF MEMBRANE STRUCTURES OF TRACK AND FIELD STAND IN ZHEJIANG SPORTS CENTER
1.
1. Civil Engineering School,Hunan University of Science and Technology Xiangtan 411201;
2.
2. Space Structures Research Center of Civil Engineering Department,Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310027
Received Date: 2005-01-20Publish Date:
2005-06-20
Abstract
The framework membrane structures are widely used nowadays. After form-finding the membrane is overlapped the framework structure to make an integral structure. The nonlinear finite element method is employed to analyze the response of the framework membrane structures subjected to the combination of deadload, pre- force, wind and snow loads; and computation results of integrality model and dividing model have been compared, and some useful conclusions are reached.
References
GB 50009-2001 建筑结构荷载规范
[2] 石卫华.索杆式展开结构的设计与分析及骨架式膜结构研究:[硕士学位论文].杭州:浙江大学,2003
[3] 卫东,沈世钊.索穹顶中考虑薄膜与索协同工作对结构性能的影响.空间结构,2000(2)
[4] 向阳.三种形式的膜结构在体育场中的应用.见:第十届空间结构学术会议论文集.北京:中国建材工业出版社,2002
[5] Wong Yew Wei. Analysis of Wrinkle Patterns in Prestressed Membrane Structures: [ Master Dissertation ]. Cambridge: University of Cambridge,2000
[6] 马永前.张拉膜结构的支撑体系及节点构造研究:[硕士学位论文].杭州:浙江大学,2002
Relative Articles
[1] ZHOU Wansen, ZHONG Jufang, ZHANG Yanhong, HU Xiao. Research on Time-Frequency Parameter Prediction Models of Ground Motion [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(12): 177-185. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22110105
[2] SUN Xiaoyun, HUANG Linjie, ZENG Bin, SHI Zheng, XIE Qin. Analysis of Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Concrete Frame Structures Characterized by Low Prestressing and Slope Friction [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(10): 38-45. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24091003
[3] SUI Weining, MA Yong, YANG Haitao, WU Jinguo. Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of a New Connection Joint Between PC External Wall Panel and Steel Frame with Frictional Energy Dissipation [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(5): 109-117. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22011501
[4] LIU Hang, LI Mu, YANG Xuezhong, HAN Mingjie, TIAN Yuji. Experimental Research on Seismic Performance of Self-centering Prefabricated RC Frame Structures [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(1): 65-73. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062601
[5] HUANG Linjie, ZENG Bin, ZHOU Zhen, ZHANG Wenqing, SANG Chenxu, ZHANG Jingru. Influence of Joint Stiffness After Gap Opening on Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames with Variable Friction Dampers [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(12): 88-93. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22072916
[6] CHANG Zhaoqun, LIU Boquan, HAN Meng, BAI Tao, XING Guohua, WANG Shuangbing. DESIGN AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF AN INNOVATIVE SELF-CENTERING FRICTION DAMPER [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 138-142,221. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20080402
[7] HUANG Ming, LIU Ye, DING Yi, LYU Qingfang. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON SELF-CENTERING CLB ROCKING WALL EQUIPPED WITH CFD [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 40-46,61. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21042509
[8] HAN Tengfei, XU Gang, LI Liang, LI Xiaodong, XI Xiangdong. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF SHEAR RESISTANCE OF FRICTION CONNECTION WITH HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(11): 133-136. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201909120001
[9] HUANG, Linjie, ZHOU, Zhen. INVESTIGATION ON INFLUENCE OF INFILL WALLS ON HIGHER MODE EFFECT OF SELF-CENTERING PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURES [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 34-39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001007
[10] MENG, Shaoping, CAI, Xiaoning. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON PRESTRESSED SELF-RESETTING CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 1-6. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001001
[11] MA, Junfeng, ZHOU, Zhen. HYSTERICAL BEHAVIOR OF AN UPPER-BOTTOM FRICTION DAMPER SELF-CENTERING PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTION WITH HIDDEN CORBEL [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(1): 16-21,124. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202001004
[14] Liu Pengfei, Zhao Qilin, Jiang Kebin, Gao Hesheng. THEORETIC RESEARCH ON FRICTION LOSS OF PRE-STRESS IN LARGE-SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(10): 64-67. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201110016
[15] Wu Yingjun, Chen Zhihua, LüQing. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF ROLL CABLE-STRUT JOINT IN SUSPEND-DOME [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(8): 27-29,34. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201008007
[16] Wu Zhuanqin, Zeng Zhaobo, Shang Renjie, Liu Jingliang. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FRICTION COEFFICIENT OF RETARD-BONDED PRESTRESSING STRAND [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(11): 20-23. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200811006
[17] Cai Jiangyong. IMPROVING SUGGESTION ON CALCULATION METHOD OF FRICTION LOSS IN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURE [J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(4): 94-95,75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200404029
Cited by Periodical cited type(1) 1. 张文超，李帅. 结构抗震时程分析输入地震波选择方法研究. 砖瓦. 2024(07): 73-75 .
Other cited types(4)
Proportional views
Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Amount of access Chart context menu Abstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads Statistics Abstract Views HTML Views PDF Downloads 2024-04 2024-05 2024-06 2024-07 2024-08 2024-09 2024-10 2024-11 2024-12 2025-01 2025-02 2025-03 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Class Distribution FULLTEXT : 14.4 % FULLTEXT : 14.4 % META : 84.0 % META : 84.0 % PDF : 1.5 % PDF : 1.5 % FULLTEXT META PDF Created with Highcharts 5.0.7 Chart context menu Access Area Distribution 其他 : 8.2 % 其他 : 8.2 % China : 1.5 % China : 1.5 % 上海 : 0.5 % 上海 : 0.5 % 保定 : 0.5 % 保定 : 0.5 % 信阳 : 0.5 % 信阳 : 0.5 % 北京 : 4.1 % 北京 : 4.1 % 南通 : 0.5 % 南通 : 0.5 % 南阳 : 0.5 % 南阳 : 0.5 % 厦门 : 0.5 % 厦门 : 0.5 % 台州 : 0.5 % 台州 : 0.5 % 呼和浩特 : 0.5 % 呼和浩特 : 0.5 % 嘉兴 : 0.5 % 嘉兴 : 0.5 % 大庆 : 0.5 % 大庆 : 0.5 % 天津 : 0.5 % 天津 : 0.5 % 太原 : 0.5 % 太原 : 0.5 % 宁波 : 0.5 % 宁波 : 0.5 % 宿州 : 1.0 % 宿州 : 1.0 % 常德 : 0.5 % 常德 : 0.5 % 廊坊 : 1.0 % 廊坊 : 1.0 % 延安 : 0.5 % 延安 : 0.5 % 张家口 : 5.2 % 张家口 : 5.2 % 无锡 : 1.5 % 无锡 : 1.5 % 昆明 : 0.5 % 昆明 : 0.5 % 晋城 : 0.5 % 晋城 : 0.5 % 朝阳 : 0.5 % 朝阳 : 0.5 % 杭州 : 1.5 % 杭州 : 1.5 % 桂林 : 0.5 % 桂林 : 0.5 % 沈阳 : 0.5 % 沈阳 : 0.5 % 深圳 : 0.5 % 深圳 : 0.5 % 潍坊 : 0.5 % 潍坊 : 0.5 % 芒廷维尤 : 11.9 % 芒廷维尤 : 11.9 % 芝加哥 : 3.1 % 芝加哥 : 3.1 % 苏州 : 0.5 % 苏州 : 0.5 % 蚌埠 : 1.0 % 蚌埠 : 1.0 % 西宁 : 34.5 % 西宁 : 34.5 % 西安 : 0.5 % 西安 : 0.5 % 贵阳 : 1.5 % 贵阳 : 1.5 % 运城 : 5.7 % 运城 : 5.7 % 邯郸 : 0.5 % 邯郸 : 0.5 % 郑州 : 1.5 % 郑州 : 1.5 % 金华 : 0.5 % 金华 : 0.5 % 长沙 : 0.5 % 长沙 : 0.5 % 阳泉 : 2.1 % 阳泉 : 2.1 % 黄冈 : 0.5 % 黄冈 : 0.5 % 其他 China 上海 保定 信阳 北京 南通 南阳 厦门 台州 呼和浩特 嘉兴 大庆 天津 太原 宁波 宿州 常德 廊坊 延安 张家口 无锡 昆明 晋城 朝阳 杭州 桂林 沈阳 深圳 潍坊 芒廷维尤 芝加哥 苏州 蚌埠 西宁 西安 贵阳 运城 邯郸 郑州 金华 长沙 阳泉 黄冈
Login
Register
E-alert
DownLoad: