Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Wang Xinling, Kang Xiandong, Li Ke, Huang Weidong. FATIGUE DAMAGE MECHANISM OF HRBF500 RC BEAMS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(11): 45-48. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201311011
Citation: Zhang Yuhui, Zhao Zhonghu, Ju Yang. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF COLLAPSE OF RC FRAME UNDER EARTHQUAKE LOADS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(3): 57-61,79. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200403018

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF COLLAPSE OF RC FRAME UNDER EARTHQUAKE LOADS

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200403018
  • Received Date: 2003-11-12
  • Publish Date: 2004-03-20
  • In this paper, the recent research on collapse mechanism, failure criterion and numerical simulation of RC frames under earthquake force is introduced, and the main problems and the development trend in the present research are also analyzed.
  • [2] 郭子雄, 吕西林.高轴压比框架柱抗震性能试验研究.华侨大学学报, 1999, 20(3):258~263
    张雷明, 刘西拉.框架结构倒塌分析中的几个问题.上海交通大学学报, 2001, 35(10):1?578~1?582
    [3] 黄行松.钢筋混凝土框架在低周反复荷载下的受力性能研究.福建建筑, 2000(增刊):2~5
    [4] 王震宇, 吴波, 林少书, 李惠, 黄玉龙.香港地区钢筋混凝土框架柱的抗震性能试验研究.哈尔滨建筑大学学报, 2001, 34(2):6~11
    [5] 彭伟.钢筋混凝土框架短柱抗震性能的试验研究.成都科技大学学报, 1996(1):54~58
    [6] 杜宏彪.双向压弯钢筋混凝土柱的抗震性能.哈尔滨建筑大学学报, 1999, 32(4):47~52
    [7] 李军旗.钢筋混凝土构件双向循环往复加载试验及分析.兰州铁道学院学报, 2002, 19(1):13~16
    [8] Lai S S, Will G T, Otani S.Model for Inelastic Biaxial Bending of Concrete Members. J.Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1984, 110(11):2?563~2?584
    [9] Li K N.Nonlinear.In: Earthquake Response of Space Frame with Triaxial Interaction.In:Earthquake Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Structures-A Volume. Tokyo:University of Tokyo Press, 1993, 9.441~452
    [10] Ambrisi A D, Filippou F C.Modeling of Cyclic Shear Behavior in RC Members J.Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1999, 125(10):1?143~1?150
    [11] Miramonte D, Merabet O, Reynouark J M.Beam Global Model for the Seismic Analysis of RC Frames.Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1996, 25(7):671~688
    [12] 薛伟辰, 周氏, 吕志涛.混凝土杆系结构滞回全过程分析.工程力学, 1996, 13(3):8~16
    [13] 杜宏彪, 沈聚敏.在任意加载路线下双轴弯曲钢筋混凝土柱的非线性分析.地震工程与工程振动, 1990, 10(3):41~55
    [14] Roufaiel M S L, Meyer C.Analytical Modeling of Hysteretic Behavior of RC Frames.J.Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1987, 113(3):429~444
    [15] 顾祥林, 张誉.多层大开间结构体系及其抗震性能研究.土木工程学报, 1998, 31(5):15~23
    [16] 汪梦甫.高层建筑结构非线性地震反应分析.见:中国力学学会第二届青年学术讨论会论文集.中国力学学会, 1990
    [17] 冯仲齐, 梅占馨.钢筋混凝土框架杆件弹塑性动力分析模型的改进.应用力学学报, 2001, 18(4):50~55
    [18] 汪梦甫.钢筋混凝土框剪结构非线性地震反应分析.工程力学, 1999, 16(4):136~143
    [19] 柳炳康, 黄慎江, 周安等.钢筋混凝土框架梁柱偏心节点抗震性能的试验研究.建筑结构学报, 1999, 20(5):50~58
    [20] 卞国炎, 周昌农.钢筋混凝土框架梁柱偏心外节点抗震性能的试验研究.安徽建筑, 1998(5):53~54
    [21] 傅剑平, 白绍良, 王峥, 等.考虑轴压比影响的钢筋混凝土框架内节点抗震性能试验研究.重庆建筑大学学报, 2000, 22(增刊):60~66
    [22] 杜宏彪, 沈聚敏.空间钢筋混凝土框架结构模型的振动台试验研究.建筑结构学报, 1995, 16(1):60~69
    [23] 顾祥林, 孙飞飞.混凝土结构的计算机仿真.上海:同济大学出版社, 2002
    [24] 冯世平.钢筋混凝土框架结构屈服后性能的研究:[博士学位论文].北京:清华大学, 1985
    [25] 刘春明.钢筋混凝土框架结构倒塌分析:[硕士学位论文].北京:清华大学, 1991
    [26] 倪强.钢筋混凝土框架结构地震倒塌机理的集成计算机仿真系统研究:[博士学位论文].武汉:华中理工大学, 1999
    [27] 魏琏, 等.钢筋混凝土框架结构地震破坏机理探讨.工程抗震, 1998(1):3~5
    [28] 徐培福, 肖从真.高层建筑混凝土结构的稳定设计.建筑结构, 2001, 31(8):69~72
    [29] 杜修力.钢筋混凝土房屋结构弹塑性地震反应分析文献综述.世界地震工程, 1990(4):1~7
    [30] Park Y J, Ang A H S, Wen Y K.Seismic Damage Analysis of Reinforce Concrete Buildings.J.Structure Engineering, ASCE, 1985, 111(4):740~756
    [31] Usami T, Kumar Satish.Damage Evaluation in Steel Box Columns by Pseudo-Dynamic Tests.J.Structure Engineering, ASCE, 1995
    [32] 李军旗, 赵世春.钢筋混凝土构件损伤模型.兰州铁道学院学报(自然科学版), 2000, 19(3):25~27
    [33] 李贤兴.钢筋混凝土空间结构的地震损伤评估.见:结构工程科学发展青年专家研讨会论文集.哈尔滨:国家自然科学基金委员会, 1992.165~174
    [34] 刘伯权, 刘鸣, 白绍良.钢筋混凝土柱的破坏与能量吸收.地震工程与工程振动, 1998, 14(1):17~21
    [35] Bannon H, Biggs J M.Seismic Damage in Reinforced Concrete Frames.J.Structure Engineering, ASCE, 1981, 107(9)
    [36] 焦双健, 魏巍, 冯启民.钢筋混凝土框架地震破坏研究综述.世界地震工程, 2000, 16(4):42~46
    [37] Park Y J, et al.IDARC:Inelastic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame Shall Wall Structures NCEER-87-0008, SUNY, USA, 1987
    [38] Li K N.Canny-C, A Computer Program for 3D Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis of Building Structures.Report No.004, National University of Singapore, 1993
    [39] 秦东, 范立础.钢筋混凝土结构倒塌全过程数值模拟.同济大学学报, 2001, 29(1):80~83
    [40] 焦双健, 冯启民, 付长文.钢筋混凝土框架结构地震破坏的计算机模拟方法.地震工程与工程振动, 2002, 22(2):54~59
    [41] 程纬, 孙利民, 范立础.ANSYS二次开发功能及其在双层高架桥墩地震倒塌仿真分析中的应用.计算机工程与应用, 2002, 38(13):208~209
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Xue, MEN Jinjie, RONG Qiang, QIAO Dehao. Research on Prediction Models of Flexural Capacity of Corroded RC Beams Based on Ensemble Learning[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(12): 128-137. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24012901
    [2]LIU Bin, YANG Jiaqi, LIU Tianqiao, HU Lili, FENG Peng. Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with Prestressed CFRP Plates with High Ductility[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(6): 72-80. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23111328
    [3]SONG Songke, DU Taoming, YANG Tao, ZHANG Qinghua. Coupling Effect Mechanism of Pavement Characteristics on Fatigue Damage of Orthotropic Steel Decks[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(12): 229-237. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG21122303
    [4]HOU Chongchi, WANG Kaixuan, ZHENG Wenzhong, LIU Yuchen, ZHANG Lijia, LI Hongbin. Seismic Performance and Cumulative Damage Analysis of Concrete Columns Confined by High-Strength Stirrups[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(3): 133-142. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22111310
    [5]ZHU Linxuan, ZHANG Mingyi, CHEN Chaoran, ZHOU Zhijun, WANG Miaomiao. Prediction of Carbonation Depth of Reinforced Concrete Beams Under Cyclic Flexural Loads[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(11): 139-143,212. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21112513
    [6]LI Bin, LUO Yanyan, LI Xingbo. Seismic Performance Test and Finite Element Analysis of Monolithic Precast Shear Wall with Partially-Connected Vertical Distributed Steel Bars[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(5): 51-59,23. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21040601
    [7]HU Wenhao, GUO Rui, REN Yu. Study on the Flexural Capacity of RC Beams Strengthened with FRP Grids Based on the Bond-Slip Cohesive Model[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(3): 216-226. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062512
    [8]CUI Honghuan, HE Jingyun, ZHANG Zhenhuan, YANG Xingran, WANG Xiaojing. A FREEZE-THAW DAMAGE MODEL OF CEMENT-SOLIDIFIED SOIL IN SEASONAL FROZEN SOIL ZONES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(5): 158-163. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20072406
    [9]GAO Ziqi, ZHANG Jintao, ZHANG Hao, HAO Han, GUO Rui. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR OF DAMAGED RC BEAMS REINFORCED BY FRP[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(5): 44-50,43. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20110321
    [10]Zhu Chenfei, Liu Xiaojun, Li Wenzhe, Wu Yonggen, Liu Qingtao. STUDY OF FREEZE-THAW DURABILITY AND DAMAGE MODEL OFHYBRID FIBER CONCRETE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(2): 10-14. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201502003
    [11]Wang Zheng, Shi Qingxuan. COMPARATIVE ANANLYSIS OF SHEAR CAPACITY FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(7): 105-109,138. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201307024
    [12]Wang Yutian, Zhang Wei, Jiang Fuxiang. EXPERIMENT ON THE BENDING PERFORMANCE OF CFRP REINFORCED PRE-DAMAGED REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM UNDER SEAWATER ENVIRONMENT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(2): 99-103. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201302020
    [13]Jia Jinqing, Zhang Lihua, Meng Gang. CALCULATION METHOD FOR DAMAGE INDEX OF RC BEAM UNDER FATIGUE LOADING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(8): 54-58. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201208012
    [14]Liao Yanfen, Qi Yaqing, Ma Xiaoqian. NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS IN FIRE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(7): 31-37. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201107007
    [15]Wang Xinling, Chen Qingping, Du Lin. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON HRBF500 HIGH STRENGTH RC BEAMS FOR HIGH SPEED RAILWAY UNDER FATIGUE LOADING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(11): 18-21,26. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201011006
    [16]Jiang Chaowen, Zhang Jiwen. NON-LINEAR ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE BEAM-COLUMN ASSEMBLIES REINFORCED WITH FINE GRAINED HIGH STRENGTH STEEL BARS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(11): 40-44. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200911010
    [17]Zhao Yong, Wang Xiaofeng, Su Xiaozu, Cheng Zhijun. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTS OF SURFACE REINFORCEMENT ON CRACK SPACING AND WIDTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(11): 29-32. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200911008
    [18]Hu Ling, Yang Yongxin, Wang Quanfeng, Xu Yuye, Wang Jiangen. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON BOND ANCHORAGE PROPERTIES OF HRBF500 STEEL BARS IN CONCRETE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(11): 13-16,44. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200911004
    [19]Liu Ronggui, Fu Kai, Yan Tingcheng. THE FATIGUE PROPERTIES OF PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURE UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF FREEZE-THAW CYCLE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(11): 75-78. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200811018
    [20]Ouyang Yu, Wang Peng, Zhang Yunchao. CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS OF FLEXURAL AND SHEAR CAPACITY OF RC BEAMS STRENGTHENED WITH BFRP SHEETS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(6): 24-27. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200706007
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-0302.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 6.9 %FULLTEXT: 6.9 %META: 88.8 %META: 88.8 %PDF: 4.4 %PDF: 4.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.3 %其他: 5.3 %China: 0.6 %China: 0.6 %Taiwan, China: 1.2 %Taiwan, China: 1.2 %[]: 1.6 %[]: 1.6 %上海: 3.4 %上海: 3.4 %东莞: 1.6 %东莞: 1.6 %佛山: 0.3 %佛山: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %兰州: 0.9 %兰州: 0.9 %北京: 14.7 %北京: 14.7 %南京: 3.1 %南京: 3.1 %南充: 0.3 %南充: 0.3 %南宁: 0.6 %南宁: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %厦门: 0.6 %厦门: 0.6 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 3.1 %合肥: 3.1 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %墨尔本: 0.3 %墨尔本: 0.3 %大连: 1.9 %大连: 1.9 %天津: 1.6 %天津: 1.6 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %宁波: 0.6 %宁波: 0.6 %宜昌: 0.3 %宜昌: 0.3 %广州: 2.5 %广州: 2.5 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %延安: 0.3 %延安: 0.3 %张家口: 1.9 %张家口: 1.9 %成都: 1.2 %成都: 1.2 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.6 %杭州: 3.4 %杭州: 3.4 %武汉: 3.4 %武汉: 3.4 %江门: 0.3 %江门: 0.3 %沈阳: 1.2 %沈阳: 1.2 %洛阳: 0.6 %洛阳: 0.6 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 0.9 %温州: 0.9 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.3 %焦作: 0.3 %焦作: 0.3 %石家庄: 1.6 %石家庄: 1.6 %福州: 1.6 %福州: 1.6 %绵阳: 0.6 %绵阳: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 11.6 %芒廷维尤: 11.6 %芝加哥: 2.5 %芝加哥: 2.5 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %英国: 0.6 %英国: 0.6 %蚌埠: 0.3 %蚌埠: 0.3 %衡水: 0.9 %衡水: 0.9 %西宁: 2.2 %西宁: 2.2 %西安: 2.5 %西安: 2.5 %诺沃克: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %贵阳: 1.2 %贵阳: 1.2 %运城: 3.7 %运城: 3.7 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 1.6 %郑州: 1.6 %重庆: 1.6 %重庆: 1.6 %铁岭: 0.3 %铁岭: 0.3 %长沙: 0.9 %长沙: 0.9 %雅安: 0.9 %雅安: 0.9 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %首尔: 0.6 %首尔: 0.6 %其他ChinaTaiwan, China[]上海东莞佛山保定兰州北京南京南充南宁南昌南通厦门台州合肥哈尔滨嘉兴墨尔本大连天津太原宁波宜昌广州廊坊延安张家口成都昆明朝阳杭州武汉江门沈阳洛阳济南深圳温州漯河潍坊焦作石家庄福州绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州英国蚌埠衡水西宁西安诺沃克贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆铁岭长沙雅安青岛首尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (91) PDF downloads(145) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return