Effects of Interfacial Treatment on Bonding Properties of MPC Mortar-NC Interface

LIU Yuan; XIN Li; MA Simin; LI Ran; YE Yanxia

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG24071902

Volume 55 Issue 5

May 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2025 > 55(5): 270-279

LIU Yuan, XIN Li, MA Simin, LI Ran, YE Yanxia. Effects of Interfacial Treatment on Bonding Properties of MPC Mortar-NC Interface[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(5): 270-279. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24071902

Citation:

LIU Yuan, XIN Li, MA Simin, LI Ran, YE Yanxia. Effects of Interfacial Treatment on Bonding Properties of MPC Mortar-NC Interface[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(5): 270-279. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24071902

Citation:

PDF( 1789 KB)

Effects of Interfacial Treatment on Bonding Properties of MPC Mortar-NC Interface

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG24071902

LIU Yuan¹,
XIN Li¹,
MA Simin²,
LI Ran²,
YE Yanxia^{2
,
,}

1. Northwest Design & Research Institute of Architecture, Xi'an 710018, China;
2. School of Architecture and Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710061, China

Received Date: 2024-07-19
Available Online: 2025-07-15

Abstract

Abstract

The interfacial bonding strength and failure mechanism of magnesium phosphate cement （MPC） mortar and ordinary concrete （NC） are very important for the structural performance of MPC mortar to reinforce NC. In this paper， the double-sided shear test was used to study the influence of four different interface types on the bonding properties of the MPC mortar-NC interface， the failure process of the specimen was observed， the relationship curve between the bond strength and the slip amount was obtained， the failure mode and failure mechanism of the specimen were analyzed. The effects of curing ages（7 days and 28 days） as well as different compressive strengths （60 MPa and 55 MPa） on the interface bonding properties were compared. On the basis of theoretical analysis and combined with the experimental data， a calculation formula for the shear capacity of the bonded interface was proposed， suitable for different interface treatment conditions. In addition， a two-line constitutive model was established for the non-planting interface， and a three-line constitutive model was developed for the planting interface. This study provides theoretical support and design basis for the application of MPC in structural reinforcement engineering.
- magnesium phosphate cement mortar,
- double-sided shear test,
- interface failure mechanism,
- shear capacity,
- bond-slip constitutive model

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	姜洪义，周环，杨慧. 超快硬磷酸盐修补水泥水化硬化机理的研究［J］. 武汉理工大学学报，2002（4）：18-20.
[2]	范英儒. 磷酸镁水泥基材料的修补粘结性能研究［D］. 重庆：重庆大学，2016.
[3]	杨全兵，张树青，杨钱荣，等. 新型快硬磷酸盐修补材料性能［J］. 混凝土与水泥制品，2000（4）：8-11.
[4]	BUJ I，TORRAS J，CASELLAS D，et al. Effect of heavy metals and water content on the strength of magnesium phosphate cements［J］. Journal of Hazardous Materials，2009，170（1）：345-350.
[5]	JIANG H，ZHANG J，LI T，et al. Feasibility analysis of magnesium phosphate cement as a repair material for base slab of China railway track system II ballastless track［J］. Construction and Building Materials，2022，326，126821.
[6]	LIU X，LI Y. Plain concrete prisms externally strengthened by CFRP bonded with graphene oxide–modified magnesium phosphate cement［J］. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering，2020，32（5），04020069.
[7]	武芳文，梅韵歌，何岚清，等. 磷酸镁水泥混凝土-普通混凝土界面直剪性能试验研究［J/OL］. 工程力学，2024［ 2024-03-14］. http：//kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2595.O3.20231106.1349.008.html.
[8]	郭进军，王少波，张雷顺，等. 新旧混凝土粘结的剪切性能试验研究［J］. 建筑结构，2002. 32（8）：43-45.
[9]	吴应雄，郑新颜，黄伟，等. 超高性能混凝土-既有普通混凝土界面粘结性能研究综述［J］. 材料导报，2023，37（16）：144-154.
[10]	ZHANG Z，PANG K，XU L，et al. The bond properties between UHPC and stone under different interface treatment methods［J］. Construction and Building Materials，2023，365，130092.
[11]	周建庭，胡天祥，杨俊，等. 键槽构造UHPC-NC界面黏结性能试验研究［J］. 材料导报，2021，35（16）：16050-16057，16064.
[12]	杜玉兵，曹德万，荀勇，等. 磷酸钾镁水泥砂浆与混凝土粘结抗剪性能试验研究［J］. 建筑结构，2017，47（4）：36-38.
[13]	国家标准化管理委员会. 水泥胶砂强度检验方法（ISO法）：GB/T 17671—2021［S］. 北京：中国标准出版社，2021.
[14]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土物理力学性能试验方法：GB/T 50081—2019［S］. 北京：中国标准出版社，2019.
[15]	RANDL N. Design recommendations for interface shear transfer in fib Model Code 2010［J］. Structural Concrete，2013，14（3）：230-241.
[16]	林拥军，徐文强，张显昭，等. 设置锚筋的新老混凝土结合面抗剪机理及黏结强度计算［J］. 工业建筑，2021，51（6）：72-83.
[17]	林拥军，徐文强，杨敏润，等. 基于三维能量屈服准则的新老混凝土无锚筋结合面抗剪强度统一计算方法［J］. 工程力学，2022，39（5）：119-132.
[18]	方志，吴荣杰，裴炳志，等. 新旧混凝土结合面抗剪性能的尺寸效应［J］. 中国公路学报，2021，34（11）：92-103.
[19]	宋国华，霍达，王东炜，等. 装配式大板结构竖向齿槽接缝受剪承载力设计［J］. 土木工程学报，2003，36（11）：61-64.
[20]	MANSUR M A，VINAYAGAM T，TAN K. Shear transfer across a crack in reinforced high-strength concrete［J］. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering，2008，20（4）：294-302.
[21]	刘飞. 磷酸镁水泥砂浆与水泥混凝土界面行为研究［D］. 大连：大连理工大学，2020.
[22]	过镇海，史旭东. 钢筋混凝土原理和分析［M］. 北京：清华大学出版社，2003.