A Review on Novel Seismic Secondary Disasters in Urban Dense Building Areas

LU Xinzheng; YUE Qingrui; XU Zhen; WANG Yixing; GU Donglian; TIAN Yuan

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG23121501

Volume 54 Issue 2

Feb. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2024 > 54(2): 25-34

LU Xinzheng, YUE Qingrui, XU Zhen, WANG Yixing, GU Donglian, TIAN Yuan. A Review on Novel Seismic Secondary Disasters in Urban Dense Building Areas[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(2): 25-34. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23121501

Citation:

LU Xinzheng, YUE Qingrui, XU Zhen, WANG Yixing, GU Donglian, TIAN Yuan. A Review on Novel Seismic Secondary Disasters in Urban Dense Building Areas[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(2): 25-34. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23121501

Citation:

PDF( 14478 KB)

A Review on Novel Seismic Secondary Disasters in Urban Dense Building Areas

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23121501

1. Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Safety and Durability of China Education Ministry, Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. Research Institute of Urbanization and Urban Safety, School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
3. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China

Received Date: 2023-12-15
Available Online: 2024-04-23

Abstract

Abstract

High-density building clusters, with a large population, a number of high-rise buildings, and significant assets, have been noticeable in the context of economic and urbanization progress. These provide focal points as well as new challenges for urban seismic mitigation and disaster prevention. Concurrently, with the progress in seismic engineering research and its practical applications, traditional seismic risks, such as structural collapses, have seen a gradual decline. Nonetheless, novel seismic disasters, such as post-earthquake falling debris and fires, have gained prominence. These are extremely destructive and lack effective mitigation measures. Therefore, the paper focused on four typical novel seismic secondary disasters: post-earthquake falling debris, post-earthquake fires, people trapped in elevators under earthquakes, and site-city interaction effects. The current preliminary research findings on novel seismic secondary disasters were summarized, and an outlook on future research directions was proposed, so as to provide a scholarly reference for the exploration of novel seismic disasters.
- earthquake,
- falling debris,
- post-earthquake fires,
- people trapped in elevators,
- site-city effect,
- urban dynamic elasto-plastic analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(92)

References

[1]	CORNELL C A, JALAYER F, HAMBURGER R O,et al. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering-asce, 2002,128:526-533.
[2]	ROSSETTO T, ELNASHAI A S. A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures[J]. Engineering Structures, 2005,27:397-409.
[3]	ELLINGWOOD B. Mitigating risk from abnormal loads and progressive collapse[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2006,20:315-323.
[4]	ZAREIAN F, KRAWINKLER H. Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2007,36(13):1901-1914.
[5]	KHANDELWAL K, EL-TAWIL S, KUNNATH S K, et al. Macromodel-based simulation of progressive collapse:steel frame structures[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 2008,134:1070-1078.
[6]	LI Y, LU X Z, GUAN H, et al. An improved tie force method for progressive collapse resistance design of reinforced concrete frame structures[J]. Engineering Structures, 2011,33:2931-2942.
[7]	BRUNESI E, NASCIMBENE R, PARISI F, et al. Progressive collapse fragility of reinforced concrete framed structures through incremental dynamic analysis[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015,104:65-79.
[8]	BRUNESI E, PARISI F. Progressive collapse fragility models of European reinforced concrete framed buildings based on pushdown analysis[J]. Engineering Structures,2017, 152:579-596.
[9]	BENTO R, SIMES A G. Seismic performance assessment of buildings[J]. Buildings,2021,11(10):440.
[10]	PEARSON C, DELATTE N J. Ronan Point apartment tower collapse and its effect on building codes[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2005,19:172-177.
[11]	YI W, HE Q, XIAO Y, et al.Experimental study on progressive collapse-resistant behavior of reinforced concrete frame structures[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2008,105:433-439.
[12]	IZZUDDIN B A, VLASSIS A G, ELGHAZOULI A Y, et al. Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss-Part I:simplified assessment framework[J]. Engineering Structures, 2008,30:1308-1318.
[13]	EADS L A, MIRANDA E, KRAWINKLER H, et al. An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2013, 42(1):25-41.
[14]	ADAM J M, PARISI F, SAGASETA J, et al. Research and practice on progressive collapse and robustness of building structures in the 21st century[J]. Engineering Structures,2018,173:122-149.
[15]	EREN N A, BRUNESI E, NASCIMBENE R. Influence of masonry infills on the progressive collapse resistance of reinforced concrete framed buildings[J]. Engineering Structures,2019,178:375-394.
[16]	VILLAVERDE R. Methods to assess the seismic collapse capacity of building structures:state of the art[J]. Structural Engineering ASCE, 2007(133):57-66.
[17]	LU X, LU X Z, GUAN H, et al. Collapse simulation of reinforced concrete high-rise building induced by extreme earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2013,(42):705-723.
[18]	XU Z, LU X Z, GUAN H, et al. Progressive-collapse simulation and critical region identifi cation of a stone arch bridge[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities ASCE, 2013, 27(1):43-52.
[19]	LI Y, LU X Z, GUAN H, et al. An energy-based assessment on dynamic amplification factor for linear static analysis in progressive collapse design of ductile RC frame structures[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2014,17:1217-1225.
[20]	ELLIDOKUZ H, UCKU R, AYDIN U Y, et al. Risk factors for death and injuries in earthquake:cross-sectional study from Afyon, Turkey[J]. Croatian Medical Journal, 2015,(46):613-618.
[21]	JOHNSTON D, STANDRING S, RONAN K, et al. The 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquakes:context and cause of injury[J]. Natural Hazards, 2014,73(2):627-637.
[22]	LU X Z, YANG Z B, GIAN P C, et al. Pedestrian evacuation simulation under the scenario with earthquake-induced falling debris[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 114:61-67.
[23]	CALVIG M, BOLOGNINI D.Seismic response of reinforced concrete frames infilled with weakly reinforced masonry panels[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering,2001,5(2):153-185.
[24]	ANGEL R,ABRAMS D P,SHAPIRO D,et al. Behavior of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills[R].Urbana:University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,1994.
[25]	DAWE J L,SEAH C K. Out-of-plane resistance of concrete masonry infilled panels[J].Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,1989,16(6):854-864.
[26]	TU Y H,LIU P M,LIN H P.Out-of-plane experimental response of strong masonry infills[C]//Structures Congress:New Horizons and Better Practices. Long Beach:ASCE,2007:1-10.
[27]	TU Y H,CHUANG T H,LIU P M,et al.Out-of-plane shaking table tests on unreinforced masonry panels in RC frames[J]. Engineering Structures,2010,32(12):3925-3935.
[28]	HAK S,MORANDI P,MAGENES G.Out-of-plane experimental response of strong masonry infills[C]//European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. 2014:139-144.
[29]	DAFNIS A,KOLSCH H,REIMERDES H,et al. Arching in masonry walls subjected to earthquake motions[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2002, 128(2):153-159.
[30]	XIE X X, QU Z, FU H R, et al. Effect of prior in-plane damage on the out-of-plane behavior of masonry infill walls[J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 226:111380.
[31]	LU X Z, YANG Z B, CHEA C, et al. Experimental study on earthquake-induced falling debris of exterior infill walls and its impact to pedestrian evacuation[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 43:101372.
[32]	TIAN Y, YANG Z B, CHEN W, et al. Pseudo static experimental study on spider-supported glass curtain walls[J]. Glass Structures and Engineering, 2022, 7:681-691.
[33]	XU Z, LU X Z, GUAN H, TIAN Y, et al. Simulation of earthquake-induced hazards of falling exterior non-structural components and its application to emergency shelter design[J]. Natural Hazards, 2016, 80(2):935-950.
[34]	QUAGLIARINI E, BERNARDINI G, WAZINSKI C, et al. Urban scenarios modifications due to the earthquake:ruins formation criteria and interactions with pedestrians'evacuation[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2016,14(4):1071-1101.
[35]	BERNARDINI G, D'ORAZIO M, QUAGLIARINI E. Towards a "behavioural design" approach for seismic risk reduction strategies of buildings and their environment[J]. Safety Science, 2016,(86):273-294.
[36]	YU J, ZHANG C R, WEN J H, et al. Integrating multi-agent evacuation simulation and multi-criteria evaluation for spatial allocation of urban emergency shelters[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2018, 32(9):1884-1910.
[37]	ZLATESKI A, LUCESOLI M, BERNARDINI G, et al. Integrating human behaviour and building vulnerability for the assessment and mitigation of seismic risk in historic centres:proposal of a holistic human-centred simulation-based approach[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020,43:101392.
[38]	D'ORAZIO M, QUAGLIARINI E, BERNARDINI G, et al. EPES-Earthquake pedestrians'evacuation simulator:a tool for predicting earthquake pedestrians'evacuation in urban outdoor scenarios[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2014, 10:153-177.
[39]	D'ORAZIO M, SPALAZZI L, QUAGLIARINI E, et al. Agent-based model for earthquake pedestrians'evacuation in urban outdoor scenarios:behavioural patterns definition and evacuation paths choice[J]. Safety Science,2014, 62:450-465.
[40]	OSARAGI T, MORISAWA T, OKI T. Simulation model of evacuation behavior following a large-scale earthquake that takes into account various attributes of residents and transient occupants[C]//The 6th International Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics. Zurich, Swiss:2012.
[41]	DE IULIIS M, BATTEGAZZORRE E, DOMANESCHI M, et al. Large scale simulation of pedestrian seismic evacuation including panic behavior[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023,94:104527.
[42]	杨哲飚.城市多尺度地震灾害情境模拟及可视化[D].北京:清华大学,2022.
[43]	SATHIPARAN N. Mesh type seismic retrofitting for masonry structures:critical issues and possible strategies[J]. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2015, 19(9):1136-1154.
[44]	SUZUKI K, MATSUBARA Y. Causes and Progress of Fires Following the 1995 Southern Hyogo Prefecture Earthquake, in:Proceedings of Annual Meeting[J]. Japan Association for Fire Science and Engineering, 1998:154-157.
[45]	TOMOAKI N, TAKEYOSHI T, AKIHIKO H. An evaluation method for the urban post-earthquake fire risk considering multiple scenarios of fire spread and evacuation[J]. Fire Safety Journal,2012,54:167-180.
[46]	MURATA A, IWAMI T, HOKUGO A, et al. Mechanism of the outbreak of fire in the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nambu Earthquake:in comparison with past earthquake fire cases[J]. Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), 2001, 66:1-8.
[47]	ZHAO S, XIONG L Y, REN A Z. A spatial-temporal stochastic simulation of fire outbreaks following earthquake base on GIS[J]. Fire Safety, 2006,24(4):313-339.
[48]	ZOLFAGHARI M R, PEYGHALEH E, NASIRZADEH G. Fire following earthquake, intrastructure ignition modeling[J]. Fire Safety, 2009, 27(1):45-79.
[49]	DAVIDSON R A. Modeling postearthquake fire ignitions using generalized linear (mixed) models[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2009(15):351-360.
[50]	YILDIZ S S, KARAMAN H. Post-earthquake ignition vulnerability assessment of Küçükçekmece district[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2013, 1(3):2005-2040.
[51]	ANDERSON D, DAVIDSON R A, HIMOTO K, et al. Statistical modeling of fire occurrence using data from the Tōhoku Japan earthquake and tsunami[J]. Risk Analysis, 2016,36(2):183-430.
[52]	REN A Z, XIE X Y. The simulation of post-earthquake fire-prone area based on GIS[J]. Journal of Fire Sciences,2004, 22(5):421-439.
[53]	HAMADA M. On the rate of five spread, disaster research[R]. Japan:Norlife Insur. Rating Organ. Japan 1, 1951:35-44.
[54]	LEE S W, DAVIDSON R A. Physics-based simulation model of post-earthquake fire spread[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 14(5):670-687.
[55]	LEE S W, DAVIDSON R A. Application of a physics-based simulation model to examine post-earthquake fire spread[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 14(5):688-705.
[56]	MENG X J, ZHAO J P. Cellular automata modeling of fire spread based on post-earthquake fire risk assessment of urban area[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011,368-373:732-738.
[57]	ZHAO S J. Simulation of mass fire-spread in urban densely built areas based on irregular coarse Cellular automae[J].Fire Technology, 2011,47(3):721-749.
[58]	RAFIA M M, AZIZ T, LODI S H. A suggested model for mass fire spread[J]. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 2020, 5(4):214-231.
[59]	THOMAS G, HERON D, COUSINS J, et al. Modeling and estimating post-earthquake fire spread[J]. Earthquake Spectra,2012, 28(2):795-810.
[60]	COUSINS J, THOMAS G, HERON D, et al. Probabilistic modeling of post-earthquake fire in Wellington, New Zealand[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2012, 28(2):553-571.
[61]	HIMOTO K, MUKAIBO K, AKIMOTO Y, et al. A physics-based model for post-earthquake fire spread considering damage to building components caused by seismic motion and heating by fire[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2013, 29(3):793-816.
[62]	HU L H, FONG N K, YANG L Z, et al. Modeling fire-induced smoke spread and carbon monoxide transportation in a long channel:fire dynamics simulator comparisons with measured data[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007,140(1-2):293-298.
[63]	CHA M, HAN S, LEE J, et al. A virtual reality based fire training simulator integrated with fire dynamics data[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2012,50:12-24.
[64]	ZALOK E, HADJISOPHOCLEOUS G V. Assessment of the use of fire dynamics simulator in performance-based design[J]. Fire Technology, 2011,47(4):1081-1100.
[65]	ŠULC S,ŠMILAUER V, PATZÁK B, et al. Linked simulation for fire-exposed elements using CFD and thermo-mechanical models[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2019,131:12-22.
[66]	LU X Z, ZENG X, XU Z, et al. Physics-based simulation and high-fidelity visualization of fire following earthquake considering building seismic damage[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering,2019,23(7):1173-1193.
[67]	JEON J, JUNG W, JU B S. Evaluation of seismic performance of 2-story fire protection sprinkler piping system[J]. Environmental Engineering Science,2014,10(3):458-464.
[68]	KIM J, MEACHAM B J, PARK H, et al. Fire performance of a full-scale building subjected to earthquake motions:test specimen, seismic motions and performance of fire protection systems[J]. Fire Safety Science, 2014,11:732-745.
[69]	SEKIZAWA A, EBIHARA M, NOTAKE H. Development of seismic-induced fire risk assessment method for a building[J]. Fire Safety Science, 2003(7):309-320.
[70]	XU Z, ZHANG Z C, LU X Z, et al. Post-earthquake fire simulation considering overall seismic damage of sprinkler systems based on BIM and FEMA P-58[J].Automation in Construction,2018,90:9-22.
[71]	SUAREZ L E,SINGH M P.Seismic response of rail-counterweight systems of elevators[C]//Proceeding of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Acapulco,Mexico:1996.
[72]	SUAREZ L E,SINGH M P.Dynamics and response of rail-counterweight systems under strong seismic motions[C]//Proceedings of the 6th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Seattle, Washington:1998.
[73]	PORTER K. Fragility of hydraulic elevators for use in performance-based earthquake engineering[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2007,23(2):459-469.
[74]	PORTER K. Seismic fragility of traction elevators[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2016,45(5):819-833.
[75]	WANG X, HUTCHINSON T C, ASTROZA R, et al. Shake table testing of an elevator system in a full-scale five-story building[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2017,46(3):391-407.
[76]	SINGH M P,SUAREZLE L E,RILDOVA. Seismic response of rail-counterweight systems in elevators[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Vibration,2002,31(2):281-303.
[77]	SINGH M P,RILDOVA,SUAREZ L E. Non-linear seismic response of the rail-counterweight system in elevators in buildings[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2004,33(2):249-270.
[78]	LU X Z, GUAN H. Earthquake disaster simulation of civil infrastructures:from tall buildings to urban areas (2nd Edition)[M]. Springer, Singapore:2021.
[79]	GU D L, WANG Y X, LU X Z,et al. Probability-based city-scale risk assessment of passengers trapped in elevators under earthquakes[J]. Sustainability,2023, 15:4829.
[80]	BARD P Y, CHAZELAS J L, GUGUEN P, et al. Assessing and managing earthquake risk:geo-scientific and engineering knowledge for earthquake risk mitigation:developments, tools, techniques[M]. Dordecht, Netherlands:Springer, 2006.
[81]	ZHANG B, XIONG F, LU Y, et al. Regional seismic damage analysis considering soil-structure cluster interaction using lumped parameter models:a case study of Sichuan University Wangjiang Campus buildings[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering,2021,19(11):4289-4310.
[82]	BOUTIN C, SOUBESTRE J, SCHWAN L, et al. Multi-scale modeling for dynamics of structure-soil-structure interactions[J]. Acta Geophysica, 2014, 62(5):1005-1024.
[83]	SCHWAN L, BOUTIN C, PADRÓN L A, et al. Site-city interaction:theoretical,numerical and experimental crossed-analysis[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2016, 205(2):1006-1031.
[84]	UENISHI K. The town effect:dynamic interaction between a group of structures and waves in the ground[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2010, 43(6):811-819.
[85]	CLOUTEAU D, BROC D, DEVSA G, et al. Calculation methods of structure-soil-structure interaction (3SI) for embedded buildings:application to NUPEC tests[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012,32(1):129-142.
[86]	SAHAR D, NARAYAN J P, KUMAR N. Study of role of basin shape in the site-city interaction effects on the ground motion characteristics[J]. Natural Hazards, 2015, 75(2):116-1186.
[87]	SAHAR D, NARAYAN J P. Quantification of modification of ground motion due to urbanization in a 3D basin using viscoelastic finite-difference modelling[J]. Natural Hazards, 2016, 81(2):779-806.
[88]	SEMBLAT J F, KHAM M, BARD P Y. Seismic-wave propagation in alluvial basins and influence of site-city interaction[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2008, 98(6):2665-2678.
[89]	SEMBLAT J F, KHAM M,GUGUEN P,et al. Site-city interaction through modifications of site effects[C]//EERI. 7th US Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Boston,United States:2002.
[90]	ISBILIROGLU Y, TABORDA R, BIELAK J. Coupled soil-structure interaction effects of building clusters during earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2015, 31(1):463-500.
[91]	LU X Z, TIAN Y, WANG G, et al. A numerical coupling scheme for nonlinear time history analysis of buildings on a regional scale considering site-city interaction effects[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2018,47(13):2708-2725.
[92]	TIAN Y, CHEN S Y, LIU S M, et al. Influence of tall buildings on the city-scale seismic response analysis:a case study of Shanghai CBD[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.,2023, 173:108063.