Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Included in the Hierarchical Directory of High-quality Technical Journals in Architecture Science Field
Volume 54 Issue 1
Jan.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HUANG Zujian, ZHOU Hao, YU Juan, LIN Borong. Research on Process-Based Carbon Emissions of Floor Construction of Prefabricated Steel Structures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(1): 147-155. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23112905
Citation: HUANG Zujian, ZHOU Hao, YU Juan, LIN Borong. Research on Process-Based Carbon Emissions of Floor Construction of Prefabricated Steel Structures[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(1): 147-155. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23112905

Research on Process-Based Carbon Emissions of Floor Construction of Prefabricated Steel Structures

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23112905
  • Received Date: 2023-11-29
    Available Online: 2024-02-27
  • Based on the characteristics of the construction process of prefabricated steel structures, a process-based construction carbon emission calculation method was proposed, and the feasibility of the method was verified in a case study of a multi-story steel-structured data center project. Through on-site measurement and investigation, the basic parameters of construction process-specific carbon emissions in 10 processes of floor deck, shear nails, steel rebars and concrete works were obtained. The calculation results were uniformly characterized as carbon emissions per square meter of floor area, and it showed that the total carbon emissions of steel structure floor construction were 0.759 5 kgCO2/m2 floor area, which was equivalent to 1.64% of the building material embodied carbon emissions of the floor construction. The carbon emission contribution was concrete works (0.477 8 kgCO2/m2 floor area), steel rebar works (0.181 5 kgCO2/m2 floor area), shear nail works (0.067 1 kgCO2/m2 floor area), and floor deck works (0.033 1 kgCO2/m2 floor area) in descending order. Among them, the carbon emissions by construction energy and material consumption accounted for 72.6% and 27.4%, respectively, and the generated direct, indirect, and embodied carbon emissions accounted for 62.9%, 9.7% and 27.4%, respectively. Based on the calculation method proposed by this study, the results obtained could show the main carbon emission sources, which was conducive to tracing the carbon emission hotspots of steel structure construction and formulating corresponding carbon reduction measures. In this case, the construction processes that generated carbon emissions more than 5% of total were the concrete mixing process, steel rebar lashing process, concrete pumping process, and shear nail welding process, which together generated 88.9% of the total carbon emissions of floor construction.
  • loading
  • [1]
    清华大学建筑节能研究中心. 中国建筑节能年度发展研究报告[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2022.
    [2]
    国务院. 国务院关于印发2030年前碳达峰行动方案的通知[EB/OL]. [2021-10-24

    ]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2021-10/26/content_5644984.htm.
    [3]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 中共中央宣传部举行新时代住房和城乡建设事业高质量发展举措和成效新闻发布会[EB/OL]. [2022-09-15]. https://www.mohurd.gov.cn/xinwen/jsyw/202209/20220915_768000.html.
    [4]
    岳清瑞. 钢结构与可持续发展[J]. 建筑, 2021(13): 20-21, 23.
    [5]
    北京中建协认证中心有限公司, 北京建工建筑产业化投资建设发展有限公司. 中国建筑行业装配式建筑发展研究报告[R]. 2022.
    [6]
    C MAO, Q SHEN, and L SHEN, et al.Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects [J], Energy and Buildings 66, 165176(2013).
    [7]
    Y H DONG, and S T NG, A life cycle assessment model for evaluating the environmental impacts of building construction in Hong Kong [J], Building and Environment 89, 183191(2015).
    [8]
    彭渤. 绿色建筑全生命周期能耗及二氧化碳排放案例研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2012.
    [9]
    X SU, and X ZHANG, A detailed analysis of the embodied energy and carbon emissions of steel-construction residential buildings in China [J], Energy and Buildings 119, 323330(2016).
    [10]
    H LI, Z LUO, and X XU, et al.Assessing the embodied carbon reduction potential of straw bale rural houses by hybrid life cycle assessment: A four-case study [J], Journal of Cleaner Production 303, 127002(2021).
    [11]
    A T BALASBANEH, and M Z RAMLI, A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete and steel-prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction structures in Malaysia [J], Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27, 344318643201(2020).
    [12]
    P VITALE, A SPAGNUOLO, and C LUBRITTO, et al.Environmental performances of residential buildings with a structure in cold formed steel or reinforced concrete [J], Journal of Cleaner Production 189, 839852(2018).
    [13]
    A M MONCASTER, F POMPONI, and K E SYMONS, et al.Why method matters: Temporal, spatial and physical variations in LCA and their impact on choice of structural system [J], Energy and Buildings 173, 389398(2018).
    [14]
    SCHEUER C, KEOLEIAN G A, REPPE P. Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications [J]. Energy and Building, 2003, 35, 1049-1064.
    [15]
    Z S M NADOUSHANI, and A AKBARNEZHAD, Effects of structural system on the life cycle carbon footprint of buildings [J], Energy and Buildings 102, 337346(2015).
    [16]
    COLE R J. Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems [J]. Building and Environment, 1999, 34: 335-348.
    [17]
    A A GUGGEMOS, and A HORVATH, Comparison of environmental effects of steel- and concrete-framed buildings [J], Journal of Infrastructure Systems 11, 293101(2005).
    [18]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑碳排放计算标准: GB/T 51366—2019[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2019.
    [19]
    陈华周, 张相勇, 李任戈, 等. 钢结构建筑装配式产品制作阶段碳排放研究[C]//2022年工业建筑学术交流会论文集(下册). 北京: 2022: 214-222.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (119) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return