Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 55 Issue 8
Aug.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHEN Daquan, ZENG Sibin, ZHANG Haiyang, LI Guowei, WANG You. Optimization of Shield Construction Sequence and Excavation Face Longitudinal Spacing in Small-Clearance Three-Lane Tunnels[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(8): 258-267. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23103017
Citation: CHEN Daquan, ZENG Sibin, ZHANG Haiyang, LI Guowei, WANG You. Optimization of Shield Construction Sequence and Excavation Face Longitudinal Spacing in Small-Clearance Three-Lane Tunnels[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(8): 258-267. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23103017

Optimization of Shield Construction Sequence and Excavation Face Longitudinal Spacing in Small-Clearance Three-Lane Tunnels

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23103017
  • Received Date: 2023-10-30
    Available Online: 2025-10-24
  • With the rapid development of urban rail transit, a large number of small-clearance tunnel shield projects have emerged, among which the theory of small-clearance tunnel construction design for three-lane tunnels has not yet been well established. Based on an actual project, this paper conducted an optimization analysis of the construction sequence, designed four excavation conditions, and examined the influence of the longitudinal spacing between tunnel excavation surfaces on surface settlement, segment displacement, and surrounding rock pressure. The results showed that: the sinkholes under the four conditions were all V-shaped, with a width of approximately 55 m (9D); the peak settlement in Case 4, where the middle tunnel was excavated first, was 10.16 mm, smaller than that in Case 2, where the tunnels on both sides were excavated first (11.10 mm); the range of ground surface settlement extended from 2.5D behind the excavation face to 1.5D ahead of the excavation face in the case of singlelane construction; when adjacent lines were constructed simultaneously and the axis spacing was less than 20 m, the working faces of the two tunnels maintained at least 16 m (2.5D) longitudinal spacing. When existing tunnels were present on the other side of the first tunnel, the longitudinal spacing of the excavation faces was kept at least 12 m (2D) to minimize the impact on ground surface settlement, segment displacement, and surrounding rock pressure.
  • loading
  • [1]
    姚志雄, 刘耀星, 张忠星, 等. 四孔小净距隧道浅埋下穿高速公路施工力学特性[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(6): 2052-2061.
    [2]
    LIU Z Y, XUE J F, YE J Z, et al. A simplified two-stage method to estimate the settlement and bending moment of upper tunnel considering the interaction of undercrossing twin tunnels[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2021, 29, 100558.
    [3]
    李国鹏, 王瑞, 赵晓薇, 等. 小净距盾构隧道施工诱发邻近建筑物沉降分析[J]. 铁道建筑, 2023, 63(1): 105-110.
    [4]
    WANG J, GAO A, CUI T, et al. Monitoring method of large section bifurcated small clear distance tunnel during information construction control[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(6): 3447-3467.
    [5]
    姚志雄, 刘耀星, 张忠星, 等. 四孔小净距隧道浅埋下穿高速公路施工力学特性[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(6): 2052-2061.
    [6]
    徐才厚, 晏启祥, 吴悦, 等. 小净距盾构隧道开挖空间效应与掌子面纵向间距的合理选择[J]. 铁道建筑, 2021, 61(9): 52-57.
    [7]
    陈秋南, 赵磊军, 谢小鱼, 等. 浅埋偏压大跨花岗岩残积土小净距隧道合理间距研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 46(9): 3475-3480.
    [8]
    孙振宇, 张顶立, 房倩, 等. 浅埋小净距公路隧道围岩压力分布规律[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(9): 84-94.
    [9]
    ZHANG H, ZHANG G, PAN Y, et al. Experimental study on the mechanical behavior and deformation characteristics of lining structure of super-large section tunnels with a small clearance[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 136, 106186.
    [10]
    陈越峰, 张庆贺, 张颖, 等. 近距离三线并行盾构隧道施工实测分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2008(2): 335-340.
    [11]
    李然, 陈平, 张顶立, 等. 大断面三孔小净距隧道围岩稳定性数值研究及工程实践[J]. 土木工程学报, 2022, 55(11): 83-95.
    [12]
    耿建仪, 梁志辉, 杨新安, 等. 八达岭长城站小净距三洞隧道中岩柱受力特性与支护优化研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2019, 39(12): 2000-2010.
    [13]
    高始军. 地铁隧道近距离下穿高铁大直径盾构隧道施工变形特征分析[J]. 铁道勘察, 2022, 48(3): 113-117.
    [14]
    刘前, 刘瑜, 梁建文, 等. 基于反应位移法的复杂软土盾构隧道横断面抗震分析[J]. 地震工程学报, 2020, 42(5): 1217-1224.
    [15]
    欧雪峰, 张学民, 刘学勤, 等. 基坑开挖与降水引起下卧隧道变形的解析计算方法[J]. 铁道学报, 2019, 41(3): 147-154.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (37) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return