Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Included in the Hierarchical Directory of High-quality Technical Journals in Architecture Science Field
Volume 54 Issue 11
Nov.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HU Changming, WANG Yanmeng, QIAN Jiazhi, YANG Chao. Study on Risk Assessment of Steel Pipe Pile Cofferdams in Geological Conditions of Water-Rich Sand Layers[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(11): 41-49. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23091420
Citation: HU Changming, WANG Yanmeng, QIAN Jiazhi, YANG Chao. Study on Risk Assessment of Steel Pipe Pile Cofferdams in Geological Conditions of Water-Rich Sand Layers[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(11): 41-49. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23091420

Study on Risk Assessment of Steel Pipe Pile Cofferdams in Geological Conditions of Water-Rich Sand Layers

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23091420
  • Received Date: 2023-09-14
    Available Online: 2024-12-05
  • As a large-scale temporary enclosure structure for bridge foundation projects, steel pipe pile cofferdams face a large number of uncertain risk factors during the construction process. In order to accurately evaluate the safety risk level of steel pipe pile cofferdams and enhance project emergency management capabilities, after a year of on-site practice and investigation, a risk assessment model based on the combination weighting-cloud model was proposed, which adopted the Lagrangian minimum entropy principle to combine the determined subjective and objective weights, and output the evaluation language with the forward and reverse generators of the cloud model. The evaluation language presented quantitative evaluation results based on the three digital characteristics of Ex, En and He mapped by various data. Taking a highway and railway combined bridge under construction as the project background, a case analysis was conducted on the steel pipe pile cofferdam project in the water-rich sand geology. The results indicated that the evaluation results were good and basically in line with the actual situation on site. In the condition of a super entropy He of 0.03, the numerical characteristics of the overall evaluation cloud of the steel pipe pile cofferdam were 3.543 8, 0.815 4 and 0.328 5. It was reflected the cofferdam was in a relatively low risk. The proposed evaluation model could provided effective means and scientific basis for the safety management of steel pipe pile cofferdams.
  • loading
  • [1]
    宋刚, 连凌云, 方勇刚, 等.铁路栈桥钢围堰工法及其安全性控制探讨[J].安全与环境工程, 2003(3):98-100.
    [2]
    CHEN L Y, JENG D S. Study on the seabed response around a dumbbell cofferdam under combined wave and current loading[J/OL]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 256[2023-09-14]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111456.
    [3]
    尹德智.双壁钢套箱围堰受力状态仿真分析与现场监测[J].铁道建筑, 2021, 61(10):57-61.
    [4]
    JIANG H B, ZHOU Z, LI H J, et al. Application of steel sheet pile cofferdam in the construction of transition pier bearing platform of hongshui river bridge[J]. American Journal of Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 6(1):60-69.
    [5]
    王勇, 易先坤, 郭星亮.深水大直径超高双壁钢围堰施工关键技术[J].铁道建筑, 2021, 61(12):44-47.
    [6]
    吴杰良.大跨度钢箱梁斜拉桥施工安全风险评估体系建立与应用[J].世界桥梁, 2022, 50(3):59-65.
    [7]
    左翼, 陈士轩, 王昌喜, 等.考虑血吸虫影响的大跨斜拉桥施工安全风险评估[J].湖南科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 37(2):58-63.
    [8]
    朱艳, 顾倩燕, 江杰, 等.基于贝叶斯方法的船坞双排钢板桩围堰整体稳定性可靠度分析[J].岩土力学, 2016, 37(增刊1):609-615.
    [9]
    张羽, 赵集云, 刘明潇, 等.内部充水钢围堰的结构安全稳定分析[J].水利水运工程学报, 2022(3):127-135.
    [10]
    戴良军, 朱大勇, 程涛, 等.陡峭岩面双壁钢围堰稳定性分析及风险评估[J].中国公路学报, 2020, 33(1):120-127

    , 137.
    [11]
    孟晓静, 陈鑫, 陈佳静, 等.组合赋权-TOPSIS在洪涝灾害下城市区域韧性评估中的应用[J].安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(5):1465-1473.
    [12]
    曹占华, 袁海平, 李恒喆.基于PCA-PNN的采空区多源指标危险性辨识[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2022, 18(12):104-109.
    [13]
    罗紫元, 田健, 丁锶湲, 等.基于熵权TOPSIS和神经网络复合方法的厦门市雨洪灾害风险评估[J].灾害学, 2022, 37(4):184-192.
    [14]
    王学军, 郭亚军.基于G1法的判断矩阵的一致性分析[J].中国管理科学, 2006(3):65-70.
    [15]
    王福生, 高湛翔, 董宪伟, 等.基于物元可拓理论的化工企业风险评价[J].安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(6):2401-2406.
    [16]
    DIAKOULAKI D, MAVROTAS G, PAPAYANNAKIS L. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 1995, 22(7):763-770.
    [17]
    芦磊, 张斌, 郑达.基于AHP-CRITIC的公路土质路堑边坡风险评估模型[J].人民长江, 2023, 54(1):133-139.
    [18]
    刘纪坤, 王佳茹, 王翠霞.改进组合赋权-云模型下的地铁站突发事件应急能力评价[J].安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(5):1398-1406.
    [19]
    李德毅, 孟海军, 史雪梅.隶属云和隶属云发生器[J].计算机研究与发展, 1995(6):15-20.
    [20]
    周子勇, 石浩宇, 董毓良, 等.基于层次熵权-云模型城市道路塌陷风险评价研究[J].安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(6):1752-1761.
    [21]
    刘广进, 彭亚雄, 苏莹, 等.基于AHP-云模型的隧道断层破碎带施工风险评价[J].安全与环境工程, 2023, 30(3):118-128.
    [22]
    文波, 赵玉霞.基于AHP-CRITIC法的高架仓库火灾风险评价[J].工业安全与环保, 2024, 50(3):6-11.
    [23]
    李蒙, 陈诗明, 曾雅丝.暴雨灾害下的建筑施工现场风险评价研究[J].安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(4):1304-1313.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (36) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return