Spatial Element Preferences and Aging-Adapted Renewal Strategies in Community All-Age Activity Circles： a Case Study of Harbin City Center

CHEN Yunfeng; LI Lingling

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG23051615

Volume 55 Issue 9

Sep. 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2025 > 55(9): 124-133

CHEN Yunfeng, LI Lingling. Spatial Element Preferences and Aging-Adapted Renewal Strategies in Community All-Age Activity Circles： a Case Study of Harbin City Center[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(9): 124-133. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23051615

Citation:

CHEN Yunfeng, LI Lingling. Spatial Element Preferences and Aging-Adapted Renewal Strategies in Community All-Age Activity Circles： a Case Study of Harbin City Center[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(9): 124-133. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23051615

Citation:

PDF( 5430 KB)

Spatial Element Preferences and Aging-Adapted Renewal Strategies in Community All-Age Activity Circles： a Case Study of Harbin City Center

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23051615

CHEN Yunfeng¹,
LI Lingling²

1. School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Yanshan University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Green Construction and Intelligent Maintenance for Civil Engineering, Qinhuangdao 066004, China;
2. School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150006, China

Received Date: 2023-05-16
Available Online: 2025-11-05

Abstract

Abstract

The concept of "renewal" promotes the integration of aging-adapted infrastructure with gradual， diversified spatial improvement methods. In the context of community all-age activity circles， aging-adapted renewal emphasizes the continuation and upgrading of frequently visited and interactive active spaces. Under the influence of social networks， outdoor all-age activity circles can be categorized into three types： close-to-home， neighborhood-connected， and expanded-neighborhood interest-based. Based on field research， this study analyzed the preferences of elderly individuals across these circles regarding 18 spatial elements， subsequently proposing targeted aging-adapted renewal design strategies.
- community all-age activity circle,
- aging-adapted renewal,
- spatial elements,
- design strategies,
- the elderly

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	陈云凤，李玲玲. 社区户外空间适老化更新的探索趋势与视角建立[J]. 住区，2023（3）:15-20.
[2]	刘立欣. 旧城更新中软环境规划与物质空间设计互动研究:以东莞莞城可园历史片区更新改造为例[J]. 建筑学报，2011（12）:18-22.
[3]	张璐，叶竹. 基于老幼复合共享特征的既有住区全龄化改造策略[J]. 城市发展研究，2020，27（10）:109-115，133.
[4]	HARING E. Towards lifetime neighbourhoods:designing sustainable communities for all[R]. London:Department for Communities and Local Government，2007.
[5]	李小云. 包容性设计——面向全龄社区目标的公共空间更新策略[J]. 城市发展研究，2019，26（11）:27-31.
[6]	陈星安，肖艳阳. 社区生活圈视角下养老设施布局公平性研究[J]. 工业建筑，2021，51（9）:65-74.
[7]	万邦伟. 老年人行为活动特征之研究[J]. 新建筑，1994（4）:23-26.
[8]	刘志林，柴彦威. 深圳市民周末休闲活动的空间结构[J]. 经济地理. 2001（4）:504-508.
[9]	谢波，魏伟，周婕. 城市老龄化社区的居住空间环境评价及养老规划策略[J]. 规划师，2015，31（11）:5-11.
[10]	何正强. 社会网络视角下改造型社区公共空间有效性评价研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学，2014.
[11]	刘杰. 基于社交网络重构的深圳社区老年户外活动空间配置研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学，2013:10-20.
[12]	吴夏安，徐磊青. 生活圈规划中的形态研究:关于适老性生活圈、高步行友好性生活圈范围的讨论[J]. 西部人居环境学刊，2021，36（5）:74-82.
[13]	SCHIMPL M，MOORE C，LEDERER C，et al. Association between walking speed and age in healthy，free-living individuals using mobile accelerometry-a cross-sectional study[J]. PLoS One，2011，6，e23299.
[14]	吴夏安，徐磊青，仲亮.《城市居住区规划设计标准》中15分钟生活圈关键指标讨论[J]. 规划师，2020（8）:33 -40.
[15]	陈云凤，李玲玲. 老龄化视角下社区户外活动圈更新设计策略[J]. 低温建筑技术，2023（10）:1-5.
[16]	PETER M，THEO P B，SURMEIJER M. The effects of neighbourhoods on size of social network of the elderly and loneliness:a multilevel approach[J]. Urban Studies，2001，38（1）:105-118.
[17]	LENNON M，DOUGLAS O，SCOTT M. Urban green space for health and well-being:Developing an‘affordances’ framework for planning and design[J]. Journal of Urban Design. 2017，22:778-795.
[18]	陈云凤，李玲玲. 空间要素对户外行为影响机制的量化检验[J]. 低温建筑技术，2023，45（5）:12-16.
[19]	白晓丹，谭少华，杨春. 基于韧性理念的社区空间环境更新策略探索:以北京市东铁营社区为例[J]. 住区，2021（4）:20-26.
[20]	王才强，冯俊才，CHO I S，等. 未来高密度居住区规划与设计框架研究[J]. 规划师，2020，36（21）:35-44.
[21]	梓耘斋建筑TM Studio. 昌里园，上海，中国[J]. 世界建筑，2022（4）:44-47.