Architectural Language of “Spectacle Era” and Its Evaluation

ZHOU Guanwu

doi:10.3724/j.gyjzG22092810

Volume 54 Issue 4

Apr. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2024 > 54(4): 1-9

ZHOU Guanwu. Architectural Language of “Spectacle Era” and Its Evaluation[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(4): 1-9. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22092810

Citation:

ZHOU Guanwu. Architectural Language of “Spectacle Era” and Its Evaluation[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(4): 1-9. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22092810

ZHOU Guanwu. Architectural Language of “Spectacle Era” and Its Evaluation[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(4): 1-9. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22092810

Citation:

ZHOU Guanwu. Architectural Language of “Spectacle Era” and Its Evaluation[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(4): 1-9. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22092810

PDF( 10155 KB)

Architectural Language of “Spectacle Era” and Its Evaluation

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22092810

ZHOU Guanwu

School of Architecture and Art, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China

Received Date: 2022-09-28
Available Online: 2024-05-29

Abstract

Abstract

The transformation of space production in the consumption era from material needs to differentiated and individualized needs has promoted the rise of spectacle culture and the arrival of the spectacle era. To discuss the relations among the spectacle culture, landscape society and consumerism, as well as the characteristics and causes of the spectacle era, the evolutional context of the main wonderful buildings since the 1960s was sorted out. It was found that consumerism had a decisive influence on the changes in the architectural language. In the absence of criticism, the architectural language could only passively adapt the changes in consumer cultures and gradually fall into the muddy of Spectacle Culture. By strengthening the polarized architectural language of formal autonomy, the prevailing new geometry could meet the needs for unrestricted manufacturing wonders, but it also deviated from the essence of architecture, which made architecture become a form game and a dependency of spectacle culture. It was pointed that to get rid of the predicament, the essence of architecture must return, and the architecture must be returned to the architectural logic and the spirit of places.
- consumerism,
- spectacle society,
- difference,
- spectacle era,
- new geometry

FullText(HTML)

References(33)

References

[1]	张一兵.德波和他的《景观社会》[M]//居伊·德波.景观社会.张新木,译.南京:南京大学出版社, 2017.
[2]	Top 10 Lifestyles. Defining the skyline of Beijing:the CCTV headquarters[EB/OL].2017-12-15[2022-05-16]. http://www.top10lifestyles.com/defining-the-skyline-of-beijing-the-cctv-headquarters/.
[3]	凤凰网.窦文涛:现在全中国各大城市都在尖叫[EB/OL].(2007-10-12)[2022-05-11]. https://phtv.ifeng.com/program/qqsrx/200710/1012_1649_256686.shtml.
[4]	来二孩,王雅静.建筑奇观生产:消费社会下的建筑现象解读[J].城市建筑, 2019(5):70-74.
[5]	鲍德里亚J.物体系[M].林志明,译.上海:上海人民出版社, 2019.
[6]	列斐伏尔H.空间的生产[M].刘怀玉,译.北京:商务印书馆, 2021.
[7]	GEHRY F. Guggenheim Museum Bilbao[EB/OL].(2015-11-26)[2022-07-16]. https://divisare.com/projects/304078-frank-gehryguggenheim-museum-bilbao.
[8]	埃森曼P.对"奇观"文化的质疑[J].时代建筑, 2006(5):61-62.
[9]	德波G.景观社会[M].张新木,译.南京:南京大学出版社, 2017.
[10]	孙全胜.列斐伏尔空间生产的理论形态[D].南京:东南大学, 2015.
[11]	COLEMAN R. Best of 2014:Eiffel tower "copyright":I didn't[EB/OL].(2020-04-23)[2022-07-12]. https://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/best-of-2014-eiffel-tower-copyright-i-didnt/?shared=email&msg=fail.
[12]	REW. Trio of finance firms commit to Seagram Building[EB/OL].(2020-09-08)[2022-07-12]. https://rew-online.com/trioof-finance-firms-commit-to-seagram-building/.
[13]	贝斯特B,科尔纳D.后现代转向[M].陈刚,吴芸,朱珊,等,译.南京:南京大学出版社. 2002.
[14]	LYNCH P. Fachada do Portland Building de Michael Gravesé desmontada para reforma[EB/OL].(2018-03-17)[2022-07-12]. https://www.archdaily.com.br/br/890643/fachada-do-portlandbuilding-de-michael-graves-e-desmontada-para-reforma?ad_med ium=gallery.
[15]	ROGERS R, PIANO R, FRANCHINI G. Centre Georges Pompidou[EB/OL].(2016-10-16)[2022-07-12]. https://divisare.com/projects/328127-rpbw-rogers-stirk-harbour-partners-hiepler-brunier-centregeorges-pompidou.
[16]	周官武.面对西方当代建筑:查尔斯·詹克斯建筑理论发展的三个阶段[J].新建筑, 2005(1):66-68.
[17]	JENCKS C. The new moderns[M]. New York:Rizzoli International Publications Inc, 1990.
[18]	SADLER V. Stunning Malevich Exhibition at Tate Modern[EB/OL].(2014-07-28)[2022-07-26]. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/victoria-sadler/malevich-exhibition_b_5621673.html.
[19]	百合香.北京地标之二:银鸟巢[EB/OL].(2008-11-09)[2022-07-26]. https://dp.pconline.com.cn/dphoto/list_546283.html.
[20]	Willis S. The tate modern and tate britain reopen in London today[EB/OL].(2020-07-27)[2022-07-25]. https://www.timeout.com/london/news/the-tate-modern-and-tate-britain-reopen-in-londontoday-072720.
[21]	THOMAS. The Walt Disney Concert Hall[EB/OL].(2012-09-02)[2021-03-27]. http://archikey.com/building/read/35/The-Walt-DisneyConcert-Hall/1192/.
[22]	德勒兹G.褶子:莱布尼茨与巴洛克风格[M].杨洁,译.上海:上海人民出版社, 2021.
[23]	周官武.脆弱的联盟:论复杂性建筑与复杂性科学的关系[J].工业建筑, 2022(1):47-51.
[24]	李姝,张玉坤.复杂性建筑与不规则碎片建筑:查尔斯·詹克斯的新书《建筑中的新范式》[J].建筑师, 2003(12):59-65.
[25]	TEEMUNNY. Dalian International Conference Center[EB/OL].(2013-04-01)[2021-03-27]. http://thesuperslice.com/2013/04/01/dalianinternational-conference-center-coop-himmelblau/.
[26]	MCGRATH K. Melbourne set to get the only Zaha Hadid Building in Australia[EB/OL].(2016-07-13)[2021-03-27]. https://www.felix.net/project-news/melbourne-set-to-get-the-only-zahahadid-building-in-australia.
[27]	弗兰姆普敦F.现代建筑:一部批判的历史[M].张钦楠,等,译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2004.
[28]	ArchDaily.100 top projects:Seattle Central Library/OMA+LMN[EB/OL].(2009-02-10)[2021-03-27]. https://www.archdaily.com/11651/seattle-central-library-oma-lmn?ad_medium=gallery.
[29]	谷德设计网. PANEUM面包博物馆,奥地利阿斯滕/蓝天组[EB/OL].(2018-07-02)[2022-07-20]. https://www.gooood.cn/paneum-wunderkammer-des-brotes-by-coop-himmelblau.htm.
[30]	张能.什么是哲学?德勒兹对哲学的另一种读法[J].世界哲学, 2016(1):71-79.
[31]	陈易.室内建筑师的塑造[J].建筑学报, 2003(4):45-46.
[32]	王建国,张彤.安藤忠雄[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 1999.
[33]	马尔格雷夫H.序[M]//弗兰姆普敦F.建构文化研究:论19世纪和20世纪建筑中的建造诗学.王骏阳,译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2007.