Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Included in the Hierarchical Directory of High-quality Technical Journals in Architecture Science Field
Volume 54 Issue 5
May  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HE Gang, ZHENG Qiqi, YANG Song, LI Dengfeng, MEI Xuefeng, LI Zezhou. Analysis on Mechanical Characteristics of h-Type Anti-Slide Piles and Cantilevered Double-Row Anti-Slide Piles[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(5): 192-197. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22092609
Citation: HE Gang, ZHENG Qiqi, YANG Song, LI Dengfeng, MEI Xuefeng, LI Zezhou. Analysis on Mechanical Characteristics of h-Type Anti-Slide Piles and Cantilevered Double-Row Anti-Slide Piles[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(5): 192-197. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22092609

Analysis on Mechanical Characteristics of h-Type Anti-Slide Piles and Cantilevered Double-Row Anti-Slide Piles

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22092609
  • Received Date: 2022-09-26
    Available Online: 2024-06-22
  • To explore a better anti-sliding structure between h-type anti-slide piles and cantilevered double-row anti-slide piles, the finite element software MIDAS/GTS was used and the three-dimensional finite element analysis models for h-type anti-slide piles and cantilevered double-row anti-slide piles were constructed. Then, the displacement, internal force of piles and slope support effect of the two anti-slide pile structures were compared and analyzed. The results showed that: 1) There were significant differences between the two types of anti-slide pile systems in terms of displacement and internal force of piles. Compared with cantilevered double-row anti-slide piles, h-type anti-slide piles were better to coordinate flexural moment and shear force of the front and rear piles, as well as displacement of piles. 2) Compared with cantilevered double-row anti-slide piles, the support effect of h-type anti-slide piles was more significant. The safety factor of slope stability increased by 21.8%, simultaneously, the maximum shear strain decreased by 63.6%. 3) Compared with the cantilevered double-row anti-slide piles, the theoretical calculations on internal force of the front and rear piles in the h-type anti-slide pile systems were more reasonable. It also showed the advantage of h-type anti-slide piles in coordination of the internal force.
  • loading
  • [1]
    李绵绵,赵法锁,宋飞,等. 双排抗滑桩的受力特性研究:以柳家坡2号滑坡治理工程为例[J]. 西北地质,2019,52(2):181-189.
    [2]
    罗勇,姜波,李春峰,等. h型抗滑桩滑坡治理中的变形特性及内力研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2017,13(6):1702-1710.
    [3]
    张静. 双排桩自稳式基坑支护结构计算方法研究[J]. 建筑结构,2021,51(增刊2):1519-1522.
    [4]
    LIU X R, KOU M MI, FENG H, et al. Experimental and numerical studies on the deformation response and retaining mechanism of h-type anti-sliding piles in clay landslide[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2018,77(5):1-12.
    [5]
    MA X C, XIAO Y, LU M. Model test of cantilevered double-row anti-sliding piles in steeply slipping landslides[C/OL]// IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.2020 [2022-09-26]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/570/6/062015.
    [6]
    宁宇,黄青富,郝李坤,等. 联合h型桩在滑坡体阻滑中应用数值模拟研究[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(23):10004-10012.
    [7]
    董必昌,张哲,付绍卿. 双向地震作用下的双排桩边坡力学性状研究[J].公路,2017,62(12):90-95.
    [8]
    温祥虎,叶四桥,毛晓光. 悬臂式双排桩与承台式双排桩的对比研究[J].公路工程,2016,41(2):251-255.
    [9]
    申永江,杨明,项正良. 双排长短组合桩与常见双排桩的对比研究[J].岩土工程学报,2015,37(增刊2):96-100.
    [10]
    申永江,孙红月,尚岳全,等. 锚索双排桩与刚架双排桩的对比研究[J].岩土力学,2011,32(6):1838-1842.
    [11]
    邹盛堂,戴自航. 双排抗滑桩与门架抗滑桩的有限元分析对比[J]. 广西大学学报(自然科学版),2012,37(4):769-774.
    [12]
    康景文,刘昌清,邓夷明,等. 地震力作用下单排与双排桩支挡结构性状试验对比分析[J]. 地震工程学报,2021,43(1):195-204.
    [13]
    中华人民共和国国家铁路局.铁路路基支挡结构设计规范:TB 10025—2019 [S].北京:中国铁道出版社,2019.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (39) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return