Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Included in the Hierarchical Directory of High-quality Technical Journals in Architecture Science Field
Volume 54 Issue 7
Jul.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Zheng, LI Shen. Seismic Performance Analysis of High-Strength Steel Frames with Y-Shaped Eccentrically Braces[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(7): 128-137. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG21091704
Citation: WANG Zheng, LI Shen. Seismic Performance Analysis of High-Strength Steel Frames with Y-Shaped Eccentrically Braces[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(7): 128-137. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG21091704

Seismic Performance Analysis of High-Strength Steel Frames with Y-Shaped Eccentrically Braces

doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG21091704
  • Received Date: 2021-09-17
    Available Online: 2024-08-16
  • In the high-strength steel frame with Y-shaped eccentrically braces, the energy-consuming beam, which called links, are arranged vertically, and the frame beams are two independent members, so the cross-sectional design is more flexible, and the plastic deformation has less impact on the frame beams and floor slabs, which is easy to repair after the earthquake. The energy-consuming beam sections were designed as ordinary steel with a yield point below 345 MPa to ensure good ductility and energy consumption of the overall structure, while the non-energy-consuming members such as frame beams and columns were designed as high-strength steels, such as Q460 or Q690, to reduce the cross-sectional size of the members ensuring the elastic stress state of the non-energy-consuming members. The length of the links and the number of storeys (height of the structure) were the main factors affecting the performance of the structure. Three sets of prototype structures of high-strength steel frames with Y-shaped eccentric braces with 8, 12 and 16 storeys were designed by the performance-based design method, with each set of link length varying from 700 mm, 900 mm and 1 100 mm, for a total of nine models. The effects of the length of the links and the number of storeys on the failure mode, stiffness, distribution of storey drift and link rotation were investigated by Pushover analysis and dynamic elastoplastic analysis. The results showed that the longer the links, the weaker the lateral stiffness of the structures; the storey drift and the link rotation showed similar distribution patterns for all structures.
  • loading
  • [1]
    彭观寿, 高轩能, 陈明华. 支撑布置对钢框架结构抗侧刚度的影响[J]. 工业建筑, 2008, 38(5):83-87.
    [2]
    于海丰, 方斌. 钢框架-中心支撑双重体系抗弯框架设计方法研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2013(增刊2):117-123.
    [3]
    MALLEY J O. POPOV E P. Shear link in eccentrically braced frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1984, 110(9): 2275-2295.
    [4]
    HJELMSTAD K D, POPOV E P. Characteristics of eccentrically braced frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1984, 110(2): 340-353.
    [5]
    蔡益燕, 钱稼茹, 郁银泉. 偏心支撑框架设计新进展[J]. 建筑结构, 2011, 41(4):7-10.
    [6]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计标准:GB/T 50011—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2024.
    [7]
    施刚, 班慧勇, 石永久, 等. 高强度钢材钢结构的工程应用及研究进展[J]. 工业建筑, 2012, 42(1):1-7.
    [8]
    李慎, 苏明周, 连鸣. 基于性能设计的高强钢组合K形偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2015, 45(6): 71-79.
    [9]
    李慎, 田建勃, 马辉, 等. 基于性能设计的高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2018, 48(3): 140-150.
    [10]
    王峥, 李慎. 不同支撑形式高强钢组合偏心支撑抗震性能研究[J].世界地震工程, 2020, 36(3):80-92.
    [11]
    田小红, 苏明周, 杨水成, 等. 高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架抗震性能对比分析[J].建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(10): 42-49.
    [12]
    田小红, 苏明周, 宋丹, 等. 高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架抗震性能对比研究[J].振动与冲击, 2021, 40(14):69-76.
    [13]
    田小红, 苏明周, 李慎, 等.高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架抗震性能影响参数分析(Ⅰ)[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 44(6): 1542-1551.
    [14]
    田小红, 苏明周, 李慎, 等. 高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架抗震性能影响参数分析(Ⅱ)[J]. 广西大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 45(1): 129-137.
    [15]
    洪敏, 秦瑞, 王凤, 等.高层高强钢组合偏心支撑框架抗震性能简化分析[J].地震工程学报, 2020, 42(2):332-336.
    [16]
    郑晓伟, 苏明周, 石鲁, 等.直接基于位移设计的高强钢组合K形偏心支撑钢框架的抗震性能研究[J].地震工程学报, 2016, 38(5):678-684.
    [17]
    郭艳, 苏明周, 胡长明.高强钢组合偏心支撑框架抗震性能研究[J].地震工程学报, 2016, 38(2):176-184.
    [18]
    李慎, 苏明周. 基于性能的偏心支撑钢框架抗震设计方法研究[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(10): 195-204.
    [19]
    Federal Emergency Management Agency. Quantification of building seismic performance factors:FEMA695[R]. California, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2009: A22-A25.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (11) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return