The Socio-Spatial Relation Transformation: A Case of Industrial Heritage Regeneration of the 798 Art District

LU Baihui; BIAN Lanchun; WANG Kang

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG23083144

Volume 53 Issue 12

Dec. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2023 > 53(12): 1-10

LU Baihui, BIAN Lanchun, WANG Kang. The Socio-Spatial Relation Transformation: A Case of Industrial Heritage Regeneration of the 798 Art District[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(12): 1-10. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23083144

Citation:

LU Baihui, BIAN Lanchun, WANG Kang. The Socio-Spatial Relation Transformation: A Case of Industrial Heritage Regeneration of the 798 Art District[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(12): 1-10. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23083144

Citation:

PDF( 11265 KB)

The Socio-Spatial Relation Transformation: A Case of Industrial Heritage Regeneration of the 798 Art District

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23083144

1. School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Beijing Tsinghua Tongheng Urban Planning & Design Institute, Beijing 100085, China

Received Date: 2023-08-31
Available Online: 2024-02-28

Abstract

Abstract

From an industrial pioneer to a beacon of art and fashion in the post-industrial era, the 798 Art District is not only a successful example of industrial heritage repurposing, but also a vivid microcosm of the times opportunities and the society progression. It has been called as "the fermenting multi-prism of group emotions" in Beijing. It greatly helps to understand the objective laws of the industrial heritage transformation and regeneration to study the history of the 798 Art District. The paper showed that the 798 Art District has gone through three stages:its establishment as an industrial base, its transformation into an art district, and its evolution into a center of leisure and consumption. The research showed that it is the transition in relationships among stakeholders that had driven the district's regeneration and transformation. Therefore, the study introduced a stakeholder perspective to analyze its transformation process from the unstable alliance to the broken alliance and then to a new alliance. It analyzed the reconstruction of relation during the two transformation phases of the 798 Art District and the resulting spatial changes, draws the interest network maps of stakeholders, and select appropriate indicators to characterize spatial features, aiming to lay a foundation for exploring the creation of a sustainable people-oriented mechanism for industrial heritage regeneration.
- the 798 Art District,
- stakeholder,
- industrial heritage,
- relation reconstruction,
- spatial change

FullText(HTML)

References(31)

References

[1]	张晨文.工业遗产档案的产生背景、内涵及保护实践[J].档案管理,2022,40(5):27-30 ,35.
[2]	International Committee for Conservation of the Industrial Heritage. The Nizhny Tagil Charter for the industrial heritage/July, 2003[R].Industrial Heritages in Kinki Japan, 2006.
[3]	刘伯英. 关于中国工业遗产科学技术价值的新思考[J]. 工业建筑,2018,48(8):1-7 ,60.
[4]	刘伯英. 对工业遗产的困惑与再认识[J]. 建筑遗产,2017(1):8-17.
[5]	刘伯英. 中国工业建筑遗产研究综述[J]. 新建筑,2012(2):4-9.
[6]	张新红,杨玉欢,刘奔腾. 中国工业遗产的时空分布特征与空间整合保护[J]. 经济地理,2023,43(2):103-114.
[7]	霍文慧.城市更新背景下的工业建筑改造方式[J].工业建筑,2021,51(5):239-240.
[8]	羊烨,李振宇.工业遗产改造中共享策略对城市可持续更新影响的研究[J].工业建筑,2021,51(3):8-14.
[9]	刘伯英,李匡. 首钢工业遗产保护规划与改造设计[J]. 建筑学报,2012(1):30-35.
[10]	骆高远. 我国的工业遗产及其旅游价值[J].经济地理,2008,28(1):173-176.
[11]	孟璠磊,刘伯英,王路. 中国工业遗产史录·北京卷[M]. 广州:华南理工大学出版社, 2021.
[12]	FREEMAN R E. Strategic management:a stakeholder approach[M]. Boston:Pitman,1984.
[13]	潘思琳. 公众参与历史遗产保护有效性分析:基于利益相关者理论视角[J].城市建筑,2023,20(2):117-120.
[14]	纪建悦,李坤. 利益相关者关系与企业财务绩效的实证研究:基于中国房地产上市公司的面板数据分析[J]. 管理评论,2011,23(7):143-148.
[15]	贾生华,郑文娟,田传浩.城中村改造中利益相关者治理的理论与对策[J].城市规划,2011,35(5):62-68.
[16]	何雄伟,卢小祁. 我国生态环境治理主体优化和协调策略:基于利益相关者视角分析[J].企业经济,2022,41(12):69-77.
[17]	金利霞,肖张荣,谢宇铭,等. 基于利益相关者视角的村级工业园改造协调机制研究:以广东省鹤山市为例[J]. 热带地理,2023,43(2):213-225.
[18]	JIANG Y P, MOHABIR N, MA R F, et al. Whose village? Stakeholder interests in the urban renewal of Hubei old village in Shenzhen[J/OL]. Land Use Policy,2020,91[2019-12-19].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104411.
[19]	薄茜. 工业遗产旅游利益相关者角色定位研究[J]. 经济研究导刊,2012(2):71-72.
[20]	于璇. 利益相关者视角下"苏荷模式"发展研究[J]. 现代城市研究,2016(11):93-97.
[21]	OLIVEIRA V J W R. Whitehand and the Historico-geographical Approach to Urban Morphology[M]. Cham:Springer International Publishing, 2019:33-46.
[22]	迟海鹏. 艺术区现状研究[D].北京:中央美术学院,2014.
[23]	韩宗保.艺术产业园区生命周期研究[D].北京:中央美术学院,2020.
[24]	刘明亮. 北京798艺术区:市场化语境下的田野考查与追踪[M].北京:中国文联出版社,2015.
[25]	LEFEBVRE H. The production of space[M]. Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,1991.
[26]	陈义风. 当代北京798史话[M].北京:当代中国出版社,2013.
[27]	胡毅,张京祥.中国城市住区更新的解读与重构:走向空间正义的空间生产[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
[28]	MOLOTCH H. The city as a growth machine:toward a political economy of place[J].American Journal of Sociology, 1976, 82(2):309-332.
[29]	高慧智,张京祥,罗震东.复兴还是异化?消费文化驱动下的大都市边缘乡村空间转型:对高淳国际慢城大山村的实证观察[J].国际城市规划,2014,29(1):68-73.
[30]	CHEN J Y, QI K. Urban regeneration with the intervention of industrial transformation and curatorial ideas:a case study of dafen village, Shenzhen[J/OL]. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 2021,1-4[2022-01-05]. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2022.100004.
[31]	张新建. 艺术也疯狂[M].北京:三辰影库音像出版社,2014:327.