Comparisons of Seismic Performances of Subway Stations Between Composite Structure and Reinforced-Concrete Structure Based on Daikai Station

ZHANG Xiaodong

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG22090514

Volume 53 Issue 7

Jul. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2023 > 53(7): 139-146

ZHANG Xiaodong. Comparisons of Seismic Performances of Subway Stations Between Composite Structure and Reinforced-Concrete Structure Based on Daikai Station[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(7): 139-146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22090514

Citation:

ZHANG Xiaodong. Comparisons of Seismic Performances of Subway Stations Between Composite Structure and Reinforced-Concrete Structure Based on Daikai Station[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(7): 139-146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22090514

Citation:

PDF( 6956 KB)

Comparisons of Seismic Performances of Subway Stations Between Composite Structure and Reinforced-Concrete Structure Based on Daikai Station

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22090514

ZHANG Xiaodong

Beijing Tiecheng Construction Supervision Co., Ltd., Beijing 100855, China

Received Date: 2022-09-05

Abstract

Abstract

In order to investigate the seismic performance of the steel-concrete composite structure subway station, based on Daikai Station, which was seriously damaged in the Hanshin earthquake in 1995, the seismic damage response of the reinforced concrete subway station in the Hanshin earthquake was first simulated and analyzed by using the ABAQUS software, and then compared with the actual damage phenomenon of Daikai Station to verify the accuracy and reliability of the finite element model. Under the assumption that all other parameters remained constant, Daikai Station's central column, roof, and beam were substituted with steel-concrete composite members, and two distinct composite structure subway station finite element models were established. The inter-storey drift angle of the side wall and the horizontal displacement time-history curve of the central column and other indicators were compared with the seismic damage simulation findings of Daikai Station, and the seismic performance difference of the subway station under different structural forms was investigated. The results showed that the subway station construction with solely concrete-filled steel tubular columns had the best seismic performance, with the horizontal displacement of the central column being around 21% less than the other two structures; at the peak acceleration moment, the inter-story displacement angle of the side wall was about 25% to 28% smaller than that of the steel-concrete composite structure and approximately 12% to 13% smaller than that of Daikai Station's structure.
- steel-concrete composite structure,
- Daikai Station,
- seismic performance,
- finite element analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(20)

References

[1]	庄海洋, 程绍革, 陈国兴. 阪神地震中大开地铁车站震害机制数值仿真分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(1):245-250.
[2]	蒋录珍, 陈隽, 李杰. 1995年阪神地震中大开车站破坏机理分析[J]. 世界地震工程, 2015, 31(3):236-242.
[3]	HUO H, BOBERT A,FERNÁNDEZ G, et al. Load transfer mechanisms between underground structure and surrounding ground:evaluation of the failure of the Daikai Station[J]. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(12):1522-1533.
[4]	PARRA-MONTESINOS G J, BOBET A, RAMIREZ J A. Evaluation of soil-structure interaction and structural collapse in Daikai Subway Station during Kobe earthquake[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2006, 103(1):113-122.
[5]	杜修力,王刚,路德春. 日本阪神地震中大开地铁车站地震破坏机理分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报,2016,36(2):165-171.
[6]	杜修力, 马超, 路德春, 等. 大开地铁车站地震破坏模拟与机理分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50(1):53-62 ,69.
[7]	李洋, 许成顺, 杜修力. 阪神地震中大开地铁车站和区间隧道破坏差异成因研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2020, 40(3):326-336.
[8]	XU Z, DU X, XU C, et al. Numerical analyses of seismic performance of underground and aboveground structures with friction pendulum bearings[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2020,130(3):1-14.
[9]	MA C, LU D C, DU X L. Seismic performance upgrading for underground structures by introducing sliding isolation bearings[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2018,74:1-9.
[10]	陶连金,安军海,葛楠. 地铁车站工程应用双向RFPS支座隔震效果研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2016,36(1):52-58.
[11]	许成顺,汪洋筱珊,杜修力,等. 分体柱在地下车站结构中的减震效果研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2021,43(4):624-633.
[12]	李忠献. 钢筋混凝土分体柱理论与技术[J]. 工程力学, 2005, 22(增刊):128-140.
[13]	LI S, ZHUANG H Y, WANG W, et al. Effect of different types of middle columns on the seismic performance of single-story subway station structure[J].Shock and Vibration, 2021(8):1-18.
[14]	曹炳政, 罗奇峰, 马硕, 等. 神户大开地铁车站的地震反应分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2002, 22(4):102-107.
[15]	LUBLINER J, OLIVER J, OLLER S, et al. A plastic-damage model for concrete[J]. International Journal of Solids & Structures, 1989, 25(3):299-326.
[16]	LEE J, FENVES G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998, 124(8):892-900.
[17]	American Concrete Institute(ACI). Building code requirements for structural concrete 1:ACI 318-19[S].Farmington Hills:ACI, 2019.
[18]	刘威. 钢管混凝土局部受压时的工作机理研究[D]. 福州:福州大学,2005.
[19]	KATWAL U, TAO Z, HASSAN M K. Finite element modelling of steel-concrete composite beams with profiled steel sheeting[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018, 146(7):1-15.
[20]	Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. PEER NGA strong motion database[EB/OL]. 2005-04-08[2022-09-05].https://peer.Berkeley.edu/n-ga.