Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Included in the Hierarchical Directory of High-quality Technical Journals in Architecture Science Field
Volume 53 Issue 11
Nov.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Pan, WANG Huaizheng, SONG Zhanping, GAN Langju, MEI Shujie. Numerical Analysis of Stress and Deformation of Tunnel Supporting Structures Passing Through Existing Anti-Slide Piles[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(11): 36-41,96. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22081603
Citation: WANG Pan, WANG Huaizheng, SONG Zhanping, GAN Langju, MEI Shujie. Numerical Analysis of Stress and Deformation of Tunnel Supporting Structures Passing Through Existing Anti-Slide Piles[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(11): 36-41,96. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22081603

Numerical Analysis of Stress and Deformation of Tunnel Supporting Structures Passing Through Existing Anti-Slide Piles

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22081603
  • Received Date: 2022-08-16
  • The force and deformation forms of the supporting structure of tunnels are usually complicated in complex conditions. Especially in the landslide area, the supporting structure is in a eccentrically compressive state. Based on the entrance section of Sunshine Tunnel in Panzhihua, the force and deformation characteristics of the supporting structure of tunnels in the condition of existing anti-slide piles cut off by shallowly burized tunnels were studied. A three-dimensional model was constructed by the numerical simulation software MIDAS GTS NX to analyze the internal forces and stress in the supporting structure and predict the weakness of the supporting structure in the tunnelling process. According to the simulation results, the shed-pipe support produced overall displacement, and the maximum deformation was 35.35 mm. The initial support produced extrusion deformation, and the maximum deformation was 34.36 mm. The internal force in the left arch waist of the supporting structure was larger due to stress concentration, while the removal of temporary supports had a greater impact on the stress at the vault and invert. The monitored data showed that the pressure in surrounding rock was uneven, and the contact pressure at the vault was largest. The pressure on the right side of the supporting structure was greater than that on the left side, and the maximum pressure was 268.60 kPa.
  • loading
  • [1]
    李雪,张玉申,王洋洋,等.砂卵石地层重叠盾构隧道掘进相互影响及控制措施研究[J].工业建筑, 2022, 52(3):10-16.
    [2]
    王怀正,宋战平,张学文,等.富水弱胶结地层大断面隧道施工方案优化与工程应用研究[J].现代隧道技术, 2022, 59(2):1-9.
    [3]
    LEI M F,LIU J Y,LIN Y X,et al. Deformation characteristics and influence factors of a shallow tunnel excavated in soft clay with high plasticity[J/OL]. Advances in Civil Engineering,2019[2022-08-16].https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7483628.
    [4]
    范志远.大断面土质隧道围岩压力及支护结构时空规律研究[J].铁道建筑技术, 2021(10):40-44.
    [5]
    张艺腾,孙星亮,杨波,等.局部膨胀对隧道支护安全性的影响研究[J].隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(增刊2):306-312.
    [6]
    张航,彭雪峰,周扬,等.松散岩堆体地层下城市隧道洞口段施工方案变更合理性研究[J].隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(增刊1):265-275.
    [7]
    卢光兆,周博,徐锋,等.浅埋偏压隧道进洞施工围岩稳定分析[J].山东大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(4):61-70.
    [8]
    田鹏.高地应力软岩隧道围岩压力及二衬受力特性研究[J].铁道标准设计, 2016, 60(8):108-112.
    [9]
    杨军平,王沾义,樊永华,等.干湿交替条件下膨胀土隧道衬砌内力试验研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报, 2016, 13(11):2220-2228.
    [10]
    冯文文,李守巨,刘迎曦.隧道衬砌结构安全性的有限元数值模拟分析[J].科学技术与工程, 2008(3):703-708.
    [11]
    张德华,雷可,谭忠盛,等.软岩大变形隧道双层初期支护承载性能对比试验研究[J].土木工程学报, 2017, 50(增刊2):86-92.
    [12]
    赵勇,李术才,赵岩,等.超大断面隧道开挖围岩荷载释放过程的模型试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(增刊2):3821-3830.
    [13]
    丁祖德,付江,刘新峰,等.考虑空间效应的岩堆体隧道管棚力学模型研究[J].铁道学报, 2018, 40(7):126-132.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (93) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return