Value Evaluation of Qingdao Great Harbour Industrial Heritage

WANG Runsheng; WANG Dawei; LIU Min; QIN Kang

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG22080917

Volume 53 Issue 2

Feb. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2023 > 53(2): 79-86

WANG Runsheng, WANG Dawei, LIU Min, QIN Kang. Value Evaluation of Qingdao Great Harbour Industrial Heritage[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 79-86. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22080917

Citation:

WANG Runsheng, WANG Dawei, LIU Min, QIN Kang. Value Evaluation of Qingdao Great Harbour Industrial Heritage[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 79-86. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22080917

WANG Runsheng, WANG Dawei, LIU Min, QIN Kang. Value Evaluation of Qingdao Great Harbour Industrial Heritage[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 79-86. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22080917

Citation:

WANG Runsheng, WANG Dawei, LIU Min, QIN Kang. Value Evaluation of Qingdao Great Harbour Industrial Heritage[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 79-86. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22080917

PDF( 1401 KB)

Value Evaluation of Qingdao Great Harbour Industrial Heritage

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22080917

1. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China;
2. School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

Received Date: 2022-08-09
Available Online: 2023-05-25
Publish Date: 2023-02-20

Abstract

Abstract

The ontological value evaluation of industrial heritage is the basis of protection and reuse. The ontological value evaluation of the industrial heritage elements of The Great Harbour of Qingdao should focus on the context of city-shipping-port development, and make scientific evaluation according to the characteristics of nearly construction, large number and unique industrial types. Based on comprehensive evaluation method and supplemented by empirical judgment method and expert scoring method, the index system of historical, technological and artistic value was constructed by classification and stratification, and the index standard was refined as the basis of scoring. The value of various heritage elements was quantified, and 121 elements were finally divided into 4 levels. The purpose was to provide a reasonable basis for the preservation and demolition of each heritage element and provide support for protection and reuse.
- industrial heritage,
- characteristics of shipping industry,
- classification and hierarchy,
- value evaluation index system,
- value hierarchy

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[1]	王月新. 青岛港工业遗产的保护与再利用研究[D]. 青岛:青岛理工大学,2017.
[2]	臧瑶瑶. 青岛港口工业遗产的保护与再利用研究[D]. 青岛:青岛理工大学,2018.
[3]	佚名. 青岛港志[M]. 青岛:青岛港(集团)有限公司, 2006.
[4]	陆邵明, 刁嘉辉, 赵浩林,等. 港口城市的集体记忆"码头遗产":以上海为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2012, 27(10):39-49.
[5]	徐博文.大连市工业遗产保护与再利用研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳建筑大学, 2019.
[6]	佟玉权. 大连港工业遗产形成的历史脉络及其完整性保护[J]. 中国水运月刊, 2016, 16(9):72-74.
[7]	青木信夫, 闫觅, 徐苏斌,等. 天津工业遗产群的构成与特征分析[J]. 建筑学报, 2014(增刊2):7-11.
[8]	刘抚英. 我国近现代工业遗产分类体系研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2015, 22(11):64-71.
[9]	季宏, 徐苏斌, 青木信夫. 工业遗产科技价值认定与分类初探:以天津近代工业遗产为例[J]. 新建筑, 2012(2):28-33.
[10]	刘伯英.世界文化遗产名录中的工业遗产(13)[J].工业建筑,2014,44(2):171-175.
[11]	初妍. 青岛近代工业建筑遗产价值评价体系研究[D].天津:天津大学,2016.
[12]	季宏, 王琼. 我国近代工业遗产的突出普遍价值探析:以福建马尾船政与北洋水师大沽船坞为例[J]. 建筑学报, 2015(1):84-89.
[13]	于磊, 青木信夫, 徐苏斌. 工业遗产价值评价方法研究[J]. 中国文化遗产, 2017(1):61-66.
[14]	蒋楠,王建国. 近现代建筑遗产保护与再利用综合评价[M]. 南京:东南大学出版社,2016.
[15]	高新波. 模糊聚类分析及其应用[M]. 西安:西安电子科技大学出版社, 2004.
[16]	金文妍. 中国工业遗产故事:胶济铁路故事[M]. 南京:南京出版社, 2016.
[17]	高飞.遗产廊道视野下的中东铁路工业遗产价值评价研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2018.