Concept Interpretation of Architectural Memes and Its Revolution Reviews

YAO Qiang; AN Na

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG22071819

Volume 53 Issue 2

Feb. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2023 > 53(2): 197-203

YAO Qiang, AN Na. Concept Interpretation of Architectural Memes and Its Revolution Reviews[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 197-203. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22071819

Citation:

YAO Qiang, AN Na. Concept Interpretation of Architectural Memes and Its Revolution Reviews[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 197-203. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22071819

YAO Qiang, AN Na. Concept Interpretation of Architectural Memes and Its Revolution Reviews[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 197-203. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22071819

Citation:

YAO Qiang, AN Na. Concept Interpretation of Architectural Memes and Its Revolution Reviews[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 197-203. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22071819

PDF( 1008 KB)

Concept Interpretation of Architectural Memes and Its Revolution Reviews

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22071819

YAO Qiang,
AN Na^,

College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received Date: 2022-07-18
Available Online: 2023-05-25
Publish Date: 2023-02-20

Abstract

Abstract

Memetics is a theory that explains the laws of cultural transmission and evolution from the view of Darwin's theory of evolution, and the architectural meme theory is the latest cross achievement of memetics in architecture. From the perspective of memetics, the connotation and concept of architectural memes were analyzed and defined, and the homologous research context of architectural memes between China and the West was studied. Firstly, based on the memetics representation theory, the core information of the concept and connotation of architectural memes were analyzed. Secondly, the concept of architectural memes was defined based on the connotation information of unique architectural information, the representational capability and defined transmission evolution capability. Finally, the research tendency on the homology of architectural memes was divided into two types:the research on the order, structure and evolution characteristics of the architectural complex system, and the exploration on the minimal characteristic factor of architecture. Thereby, the development contexts of architectural memes at home and abroad were obtained.
- architectural meme,
- concept interpretation,
- connotation recognition,
- research review,
- memetics

FullText(HTML)

References(72)

References

[1]	威尔逊. 社会生物学:新的综合[M]. 毛盛贤,孙港波,刘晓君,等,译. 北京:北京理工大学出版社, 2008.
[2]	何自然,何雪林. 模因论与社会语用[J]. 现代外语, 2003(2):200-209.
[3]	DAWKINS R. The selfish gene[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1976.
[4]	TARDE G. The laws of imitation[M]. Naperville:Patterson Press, 1903.
[5]	迪斯汀. 文化的进化[M]. 李冬梅, 何自然, 译. 北京:世界图书出版公司, 2015.
[6]	HULL D L. Interactors versus vehicles[G]//PLOTKIN H C, ed. The role of behavior in evolution. Cambridge:MIT Press, 1988:19-50.
[7]	SPEEL H C. Memetics:On a conceptual framework for cultural evolution[C]//Symposium of Einstein Meets Margritte. Brussels:Free University of Brussels, 1995.
[8]	丹内特. 自由的进化[M]. 辉格,译. 太原:山西人民出版社,2014.
[9]	DENNETT D C. Darwin's dangerous idea[J]. The Sciences, 1995, 35(3):34-40.
[10]	LYNCH A. Thought contagion:how belief spreads through society[M]. New York:Basic Books, 1996.
[11]	BLACKMORE S. The meme machine[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 2001.
[12]	GATHERER D. Why the "thought contagion" metaphor is retarding the progress of memetics[J]. Journal of Memetics-Evolutionary Models of Information Transmi, 1998, 2(2):1-21.
[13]	GATHERER D. Modelling the effects of memetic taboos on genetic homosexuality[J]. Journal of Memetics, 2000, 4(2):22-40.
[14]	布罗迪. 思维病毒如何在工作与生活中实现思维自由[M]. 叶俭慧,译. 杭州:浙江人民出版社,2014.
[15]	DEACON T W. The Symbolic Species:the co-evolution of language and the brain[M]. New York:W W Norton & Company, 1997.
[16]	DEACON T W. Memes as signs, in the dynamic logic of semiosis:beyond molecular science and computation theory[C]//International Conference on Conceptual Structures. 2004:17-30.
[17]	迪斯汀. 自私的模因[M]. 李冬梅, 谢朝群, 译. 北京:世界图书出版公司北京公司, 2014.
[18]	SUSAN B. Memes and "temes"[EB/OL].[2022-10-20]. https://www.ted.com/talks/susan_blackmore_memes_and_temes.
[19]	PAULL J. Meme maps:A tool for configuring memes in time and space[J]. European Journal of Scientific Research, 2009, 31(1):11-18.
[20]	ORAM A. Peer-to-peer:Harnessing the power of disruptive technologies[M]. London:Ubiquity Press, 2001.
[21]	萨林加罗斯. 建筑论语[M]. 吴秀洁,译. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
[22]	LEE J H. Morphological analysis of cultural DNA[M]. Singapore:Springer Singapore,2017.
[23]	高德. 迷因效应:谁在影响你,你在影响谁[M]. 天津:天津人民出版社,2016.
[24]	YAO Q, LONG B. The declaration of architectural memetics:A systematic interpretation of architectural complexity and evolutionary mechanism[C]//The 12th International Symposium on Architectural Interchanges in Asia (ISAIA). Gangwon:ISAIA, 2018:1510-1515.
[25]	帕多万. 比例·科学·哲学·建筑[M]. 周玉鹏,刘耀辉,译. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005.
[26]	WORRINGER W. Abstraction and empathy:A contribution to the psychology of style[M]. New York:International University Press, 1963.
[27]	ARTHUR E. The nature of the physical world:Gifford lectures[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2012.
[28]	CORBUSIER L. The modulor and modulor 2[M]. Des Moines:Springer Science & Business Media, 2004:72-73.
[29]	VAN DER LAAN H. Het plastische getal:15 lessen over de grondslagen van de architectonische ordonnantie[M]. Leiden:E.J. Brill, 1967.
[30]	沈克宁. 建筑现象学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
[31]	沈克宁. 建筑类型学与城市形态学[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
[32]	陈喆. 建筑伦理学概论[M]. 北京:中国电力出版社, 2007.
[33]	NORBERG-SCHULZ C. Meaning in western architecture[M]. New York:Praeger, 1975.
[34]	NORBERG-SCHULZ C. Genius loci:Towards a phenomenology of architecture[M]. New York:Rizzoli, 1979.
[35]	梁思成. 图像中国建筑史[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
[36]	蔡浩田. 黔东南苗族传统聚落公共空间结构研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学,2020.
[37]	曾婧如. 传统建筑聚落公共空间尺度层级量化研究[D].南京:东南大学,2020.
[38]	王文卉,朱雷洲,黄亚平,等.宜城市村镇聚落形态测度及空间体系结构研究[J].西部人居环境学刊,2022,37(1):109-116.
[39]	童静. 四川高海拔地区藏族传统聚落空间结构研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2016.
[40]	张海朋,樊杰,何仁伟,等.青藏高原高寒牧区聚落时空演化及驱动机制:以藏北那曲县为例[J].地理科学,2019,39(10):1642-1653.
[41]	李智,张小林,李红波,等.江苏典型县域城乡聚落规模体系的演化路径及驱动机制[J].地理学报,2018,73(12):2392-2408.
[42]	马恩朴,李同昇,卫倩茹.中国半城市化地区乡村聚落空间格局演化机制探索:以西安市南郊大学城康杜村为例[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(7):816-828.
[43]	宋晓英,李仁杰,傅学庆,等.基于GIS的蔚县乡村聚落空间格局演化与驱动机制分析[J].人文地理,2015,30(3):79-84.
[44]	章光日.徽州传统山村聚落形态的生成模式与演化机制研究[J].安徽农业科学,2007(32):10503-10504.
[45]	何峰. 湘南汉族传统村落空间形态演变机制与适应性研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2012.
[46]	陈志华,李秋香. 中国乡土建筑初探[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2012.
[47]	林兆武. 基因传承视角下闽西客家典型传统村落用地形态研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学,2015.
[48]	刘明佳. 韩城古城空间形态基因图谱研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学,2015.
[49]	安玉源,周烨伟,苏晓文. 在"基因图谱"视角下的甘南藏族聚落景观空间形态构成研究[J]. 南方建筑,2018(4):46-51.
[50]	梁楠,丁明昊.新审美语境下建筑模因与人文场景对皖南传统聚落活化再生的启示[J].长沙大学学报,2019,33(5):136-139.
[51]	姜纪水. 浙西南廿八都民居的传统建筑模因解析[D].长沙:湖南大学,2020.
[52]	龙彬, 姚强. 基于复杂性思维的建筑模因探析[J]. 新建筑, 2018(2):89-93.
[53]	姚强. 基于建筑模因理论的建筑复杂系统特征与演化模式研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学,2019.
[54]	魏秦,王竹,徐颖. 地区建筑营建体系的"地域基因"概念的理论基础再认知[J].华中建筑,2012,30(7):8-11.
[55]	王竹,魏秦,贺勇. 地区建筑营建体系的"基因说"诠释:黄土高原绿色窑居住区体系的建构与实践[J]. 建筑师, 2008(1):29-35.
[56]	王竹,王韬. 主体认知与乡村聚落的地域性表达[J].西部人居环境学刊,2014,29(3):8-13.
[57]	罗丹. 巴渝传统聚落建筑肌理形态特征识别与基因解析[D]. 重庆:重庆大学,2020.
[58]	杨大禹. 地域性建筑文化基因传承与当代建筑创新[J]. 新建筑, 2015(5):99-103.
[59]	宋俞颖. 乡土聚落空间基因形的转译研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2020.
[60]	王翼飞. 黑龙江省乡村聚落形态基因研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2021.
[61]	翟洲燕,常芳,李同昇,等. 陕西省传统村落文化遗产景观基因组图谱研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2018,34(3):87-94.
[62]	印朗川,李伯华,刘沛林,等.传统聚落景观基因胞的生物特征研究[J].经济地理,2022,42(3):182-189.
[63]	胡最,刘沛林. 基于GIS的南方传统聚落景观基因信息图谱的探索[J].人文地理,2008,23(6):13-16.
[64]	刘畅. 算法基因:晋东南三座木结构尺度设计对比研究[J].中国建筑史论汇刊,2014(2):202-229.
[65]	刘畅,徐扬,姜铮. 算法基因:两例弯折的下昂[J].中国建筑史论汇刊,2015(2):267-311.
[66]	陈未.论蒙古族藏传佛教建筑的"模因性":兼论以人物为主线的藏传佛教建筑研究方法[J].建筑学报,2021(12):87-93.
[67]	康嘉欣. 基于模因论的邵阳清真寺建筑研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2021.
[68]	杨立国,刘沛林,林琳. 传统村落景观基因在地方认同建构中的作用效应:以侗族村寨为例[J]. 地理科学,2015,35(5):593-598.
[69]	向远林. 陕西传统乡村聚落景观基因变异机制及其修复研究[D].西安:西北大学,2020.
[70]	李伯华,石凯霞. 传统村落景观基因识别及其特征分析:以张谷英村为例[J]. 衡阳师范学院学报,2018,39(3):1-7.
[71]	陈喆,周涵滔. 基于自组织理论的传统村落更新与新民居建设研究[J].建筑学报,2012(4):109-114.
[72]	郭永健. 自组织视角下的当代聚落生成机制与设计策略研究[D].北京:中国建筑设计研究院,2020.