Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Cheng Donghui, Wang Tianfeng, Yi Yamin. THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR EXPERIMENT AND ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS BEAMS STRENGTHENED WITH CARBON FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER SHEETS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(10): 25-28,63. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201110006
Citation: LIU Jinzhou, DU Haijiang, WANG Bo, LI Yue. Research on Numerical Simulation of Fire in the Back Hall of Yangxin Hall of the Palace Museum Based on FDS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(6): 171-180. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22031003

Research on Numerical Simulation of Fire in the Back Hall of Yangxin Hall of the Palace Museum Based on FDS

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22031003
  • Received Date: 2022-03-10
    Available Online: 2023-08-18
  • In order to provide data support for the fire protection work of the Back Hall of Yangxin Hall (hereinafter referred to as the Back Hall), and provide useful guidance for the fire safety management of ancient wooden structures in China, the fixed fire load value of the Back Hall was counted, and the FDS software was used to simulate and analyze the changes of heat release rate, fire spread, temperature, visibility, smoke and toxic and harmful gas concentration under different disaster causing factors. The results showed that the fixed fire load value of the Back Hall was 11 096.85 MJ·m-2. The flashover time in the fire scenario was short, and secondary flashover would occur in the process. The roof was the most threatened by the fire. The temperature and toxic and harmful gas concentration in the fire site exceeded the safe bearing range of the human body. The evacuation of movable cultural relics was greatly affected by smoke and visibility, and the opening and closing status of windows had a great impact on the development of the fire. Based on the research results, the paper put forward countermeasures and suggestions for the fire safety management of the Back Hall.
  • [1]
    王亚民.故宫博物院九十年[M].北京:故宫出版社,2018.
    [2]
    李胜利,李效斌.FDS火灾数值模拟[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2019.
    [3]
    故宫博物院古建部.养心殿研究性保护项目·文物建筑调查与评估(一)养心殿、抱厦、梅坞[R]. 北京:故宫博物院,2017.
    [4]
    故宫博物院古建部.养心殿研究性保护项目·文物建筑调查与评估(二)后殿、工字廊[R].北京:故宫博物院,2017.
    [5]
    故宫博物院古建部.养心殿研究性保护项目·文物建筑调查与评估(一)养心殿、抱厦、梅坞[R].北京:故宫博物院,2017.
    [6]
    故宫博物院古建部.养心殿研究性保护项目·文物建筑调查与评估(二)后殿、工字廊[R].北京:故宫博物院,2017.
    [7]
    肖泽楠.文物建筑防火安全现状及对策研究[N].中国文物报,2019-04-26(5).
    [8]
    蒙慧玲.我国宗教古建筑火灾隐患及防火对策[J].消防科学与技术,2014,33(6):695-697.
    [9]
    田垚,常可可,李奥.基于FDS的古建筑火灾发展过程研究[J].消防科学与技术,2019,38(1):103-104.
    [10]
    纪天斌.故宫消防[M].北京:紫禁城出版社,2005.
    [11]
    王雁楠,邱洪兴.基于FDS的古建群落火灾蔓延规律数值分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2014,24(6):26-32.
    [12]
    郭子东,吴烦,吴立志,等.基于火灾动力学模拟的古建筑火灾探测系统设计研究[J].火灾科学,2009,18(2):65-71.
    [13]
    陈静,肖泽楠. 大昭寺火灾探测和灭火设施研究[J].消防科学与技术,2018,37(4):511-513.
    [14]
    故宫博物院古建部.养心殿研究性保护项目·文物建筑调查与评估(二)后殿、工字廊[R]. 北京:故宫博物院,2017.
    [15]
    陆万里,程金新. 古建筑普宁寺火灾数值模拟分析[J].消防科学与技术,2011,30(4):290-293.
    [16]
    官丽莉,周小勇,罗艳.我国植物热值研究综述[J].生态学杂志,2005(4):452-457.
    [17]
    马千里,倪照鹏,黄鑫.大型商业建筑室内步行街商铺火灾荷载调查研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):52-56.
    [18]
    叶小曼,何其泽,赵华亮.某超五星酒店客房火灾荷载调查与统计分析[J].消防科学与技术,2020,39(7):942-925.
    [19]
    林锦. 封闭空间火灾烟气中一氧化碳和二氧化碳协同消除研究[D].合肥:中国科学技术大学,2020.
    [20]
    刘瑾洲,顾涛,王大千.国内旅游景区安全生产工作存在的问题和对策研究[J].萍乡学院学报,2021,38(4):54-58.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]FU Jingwei, DIAO Lisai, ZHANG Yinghua, MA Cheng, GAO Yukun. Research on Fire Spread Characteristics of Escape Room Entertainment Venues with Spatial Complexity[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(2): 90-97. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23121007
    [2]KANG Hengyi, DAI Haoyu, SHEN Bihui. Research on Influence of Construction Vibration Due to Underground Diaphragm Excavation on Nearby Ancient Buildings[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(12): 171-178. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21110211
    [3]ZHOU Qian. STUDY ON SOIL WORK OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS IN THE FORBIDDEN CITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(5): 204-211,203. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20052404
    [4]ZHOU Qian. RESEARCH ON CULTURE OF COSTFUL BOX IN ROOF OF BUILDINGS IN THE FORBIDDEN CITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(4): 168-174,155. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202004029
    [5]ZHOU Qian. RESEARCH ON TANG YANG OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS IN THE FORBIDDEN CITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(3): 182-189. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202003032
    [6]ZHOU Qian, LI Ying. STRENGTHENING TECHNIQUES FOR ANCIENT BUILDINGS IN THE FORBIDDEN CITY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 190-197. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002029
    [7]MAO Xiaofei, WANG Xi, HU Fuli, ZHANG Wei. ANALYSIS ON THE PEDESTAL DISEASE AND MOISTURE FIELD OF TONGXIN MOSQUE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(2): 184-189. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202002028
    [16]Ji Wenmei, Niu Tingting. STUDY OF PROTECTION MODE AND USE FOR HUIZHOU ANCIENT BUILDINGS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(05): 16-20.
    [17]Ma Hui, Xu Jianyang, Zhao Hongtie. ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE OF ANCIENT TIMBER BUILDINGS ON THE HIGH PEDESTAL UNDER RANDOM EARTHQUAKE EXCITATIONS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(02): 45-49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201402011
    [18]Yang Haobo, Qian Deling, Peng Xiaobing, Cheng Hong, Xie Yijun. DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR RESEARCH OF UNREINFORCED AND REINFORCED ANCIENT ARCHITECTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(11): 131-135. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201311029
    [19]Zhang Weixi, Chen Ping, Zhao Dong Zhang, Yanqiang. APPLICATION OF UNDERPINNING BY MANUAL PIPE-JACKING IN THE CONSERVATION OF HISTORICAL MASONRY CONSTRUCTIONS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(3): 127-130,62. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201103025
    [20]Zhao Hongtie, Zhang Fengliang, Xue Jianyang, Ma Hui, Zhang Xicheng. SHAKING TABLE TEST AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE ROOF IN ANCIENT TIMBER STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(8): 46-48. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201108013
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 3.7 %FULLTEXT: 3.7 %META: 93.1 %META: 93.1 %PDF: 3.3 %PDF: 3.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.3 %其他: 14.3 %上海: 3.3 %上海: 3.3 %东莞: 0.4 %东莞: 0.4 %伊萨卡: 0.4 %伊萨卡: 0.4 %兰州: 0.4 %兰州: 0.4 %列克星敦: 0.8 %列克星敦: 0.8 %加利福尼亚州: 0.4 %加利福尼亚州: 0.4 %北京: 3.7 %北京: 3.7 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南昌: 0.8 %南昌: 0.8 %卡罗尔顿: 1.2 %卡罗尔顿: 1.2 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %合肥: 1.2 %合肥: 1.2 %嘉兴: 1.6 %嘉兴: 1.6 %圣保罗: 0.4 %圣保罗: 0.4 %大理: 0.4 %大理: 0.4 %天津: 3.7 %天津: 3.7 %威海: 0.4 %威海: 0.4 %安德森: 0.4 %安德森: 0.4 %安條克: 0.8 %安條克: 0.8 %安顺: 0.4 %安顺: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %密蘇里城: 0.8 %密蘇里城: 0.8 %常州: 1.2 %常州: 1.2 %常德: 0.8 %常德: 0.8 %廊坊: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %扬州: 1.6 %扬州: 1.6 %旧金山: 0.4 %旧金山: 0.4 %昆明: 1.2 %昆明: 1.2 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 2.9 %杭州: 2.9 %森尼韦尔: 0.8 %森尼韦尔: 0.8 %武汉: 4.5 %武汉: 4.5 %济南: 0.8 %济南: 0.8 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.8 %温州: 0.8 %漯河: 8.6 %漯河: 8.6 %玉林: 0.8 %玉林: 0.8 %石家庄: 1.2 %石家庄: 1.2 %福州: 0.8 %福州: 0.8 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %衢州: 0.8 %衢州: 0.8 %西宁: 3.3 %西宁: 3.3 %西安: 1.2 %西安: 1.2 %贵阳: 0.8 %贵阳: 0.8 %赤峰: 0.4 %赤峰: 0.4 %运城: 2.4 %运城: 2.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 3.7 %郑州: 3.7 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %锦州: 0.4 %锦州: 0.4 %长沙: 3.7 %长沙: 3.7 %其他上海东莞伊萨卡兰州列克星敦加利福尼亚州北京十堰南京南昌卡罗尔顿台州合肥嘉兴圣保罗大理天津威海安德森安條克安顺宣城密蘇里城常州常德廊坊张家口扬州旧金山昆明朝阳杭州森尼韦尔武汉济南深圳温州漯河玉林石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁西安贵阳赤峰运城邯郸郑州重庆锦州长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (228) PDF downloads(8) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return