Comparison on Wind-Resistant Design of Transmission Towers by Allowable Stress Method and Limit State Method

YANG Fengli; SHAO Shuai

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG22011111

Volume 52 Issue 8

Aug. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2022 > 52(8): 22-27,63

Zhang Bingquan, Lin Yongpeng, Zhai Ximei. CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS OF BEARING CAPACITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE MASONRY COLUMNS UNDER ECCENTRIC COMPRESSION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(9): 42-44. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200809013

Citation:

YANG Fengli, SHAO Shuai. Comparison on Wind-Resistant Design of Transmission Towers by Allowable Stress Method and Limit State Method[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(8): 22-27,63. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22011111

Citation:

PDF( 5599 KB)

Comparison on Wind-Resistant Design of Transmission Towers by Allowable Stress Method and Limit State Method

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22011111

China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100055, China

Received Date: 2022-01-11
Available Online: 2022-12-01

Abstract

Abstract

There are still many in-service 77/78 series transmission towers designed by the allowable stress method in the strong wind area. The power grid operation departments need to gradually carry out reinforcement and retrofit according to the applicable standards. According to the allowable stress method and the limit state method, the safety factor expressions of transmission tower members were given separately, and the wind load and structural design methods in the standards of different periods in China were compared and analyzed. Two 77/78 series transmission towers destroyed in 2021 wind disaster were selected as the research objects. The stress, stress ratios and safety factors of the transmission tower members were calculated according to the allowable stress method and the limit state method, respectively. The weak positions of the typical transmission towers under strong wind were determined. The safety factors of the transmission tower designed according to SDJ 3-1979 were significantly lower than that of SDGJ 94-90 and DL/T 5154-2002, and the difference in safety factors was more than 20%. The safety level of the transmission tower designed according to SDGJ 94-90 and DL/T 5154-2002 was basically the same.
- allowable stress method,
- limit state method,
- transmission tower,
- wind load,
- safety factor

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

[1]	沈其明, 邓和平.结构设计中的容许应力法和概率极限状态设计法[J]. 重庆交通学院学报, 1985(2):12-17.
[2]	邓江涛. 极限状态法与容许应力法在铁路桥梁设计应用中的差异性比较[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2021, 65(2):72-76.
[3]	谢馨, 杜萍. 简支钢桁梁桥的极限状态法与容许应力法对比[J]. 交通科技, 2021(4): 53-57.
[4]	杨风利, 张宏杰, 杨靖波等. 下击暴流作用下输电铁塔荷载取值及承载性能分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2014,34(24):4179-4186.
[5]	裴慧坤, 陈城, 林国安, 等. 强风荷载作用下500kV输电塔线体系动力分析[J]. 工业建筑, 2019, 49(12): 25-30 ,41.
[6]	中华人民共和国水利电力部.架空送电线路设计技术规定:SDJ 3—1979[S]. 北京: 水利电力出版社, 1979.
[7]	能源部电力规划设计管理局.架空送电线路杆塔结构设计技术规定:SDGJ 94—1990[S]. 北京: 能源部电力规划管理局, 1990.
[8]	中华人民共和国国家经济贸易委员会.架空送电线路杆塔结构设计技术规定:DL/T 5154—2002[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2002.
[9]	国家能源局.架空输电线路杆塔结构设计技术规定:DL/T 5154—2012[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2012.
[10]	国家能源局.架空输电线路杆塔结构设计技术规程:DL/T 5468—2020[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2021.
[11]	冯云芬, 贡金鑫, 李宏男, 等. 输电线路杆塔构件可靠度校准[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(5): 13-20.
[12]	杨风利. 输电线路风冰荷载重现期及结构可靠性影响分析[J]. 结构工程师, 2020, 36(6):90-97.
[13]	黎景辉, 李敏生. 输电线路历年规程与新荷载规范风荷载对比[J]. 南方能源建设, 2020, 7(3):102-106.
[14]	陈海波, 廖宗高, 肖洪伟. 受风荷载控制的杆塔结构体系可靠度分析[J]. 电力建设, 2007, 28(7): 40-45.
[15]	俞登科, 李正良, 李茂华, 等. 基于矩方法的特高压输电塔抗风可靠度分析[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(5): 311-316.
[16]	李峰, 袁骏, 侯建国, 等. 我国输电线路结构设计可靠度研究[J]. 电力建设, 2010, 31(11): 18-23.
[17]	中华人民共和国建设部.钢结构设计规范:TJ 17—74[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1975.
[18]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009—2012[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.

Relative Articles

[1]	CHEN Peng, SUN Shu. Finite Element Analysis and Bearing Capacity Calculation of Combined Cruciform CFST Columns[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(5): 35-40,117. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21022307
[2]	LI Yanli, SHI Lei, WU Zhenyu, WANG Zilong. Finite Element Parametric Analysis on Bearing Capacity of Main Member Steel Angles of Transmission Tower Reinforced by Box-Shaped Section Method[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(8): 41-47. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20121307
[3]	XU Shanhua, XING Zhen, ZHANG Zongxing. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON CORRODED H-SHAPED STEEL SHORT COLUMN UNDER ECCENTRIC COMPRESSION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(8): 93-98. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG19112810
[4]	ZHANG Ailin, WU Baohuan, LIU Xuechun. BEARING CAPACITY ANALYSIS OF L-SHAPED STEEL SPECIAL-SHAPED COLUMN WRAPPED WITH CONCRETE UNDER AXIAL COMPRESSION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(6): 123-132,164. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20032801
[5]	Yu Feng, Cheng Anchun, Li Deguang, Niu Ditao, Xu Guoshi. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF PVC-FRP CONFINED REINFORCED CONCRETE SHORT COLUMN UNDER ECCENTRIC COMPRESSION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(4): 83-87. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201504015
[6]	Ge Wenjie, Zhang Jiwen, Cao Dafu, Wang Biyuan, Pan Linglong. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS WITH FINE GRAIN STEEL BARS UNDER ECCENTRIC COMPRESSION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(12): 74-77,87. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201312013
[7]	Zheng Baofeng, Shu Ganping, Shen Xiaoming. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF STAINLESS STEEL COLD- FORMED TUBULAR COLUMNS UNDER AXIAL LOAD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(5): 12-20. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz2011205002
[8]	Yao Shan, Kong Cuiwei, Zhang Jiwen. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON HRBF500 AND FIBER REINFORCED CEMENTITIOUS COMPOSITES HOLLOW COLUMNS UNDER ECCENTRIC LOADING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(11): 27-31. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201211006
[9]	Yan Qi-wu, Huang Wei, Yang Cheng-xi, Yang Di-rou, Chen Jie-gang. EXPERIMENTS AND FEM ANALYSIS FOR BEARING CAPACITY OF ARCH SUPPORT PORTALFRAME[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(10): 108-112. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201210023
[10]	Yang Lingming Jiang Haibo Zou Jinhua He Aide, . STUDY ON THE RIGID FRAME BRIDGE STRENGTHENED BY EXTERNAL PRESTRESSING TENDONS AND ANCHOR BLOCKS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(10): 11-14. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201010003
[11]	Gong Yongzhi, Zhang Jiwen, Jiang Lizhong, Tu Yongming. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF THE AXIAL COMPRESSION CONCRETE COLUMNS REINFORCED WITH CFRP[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(7): 67-70. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201007018
[12]	Wang Weihua, Tao Zhong. FE ANALYSIS OF CIRCULAR CFST COLUMNS IN FIRE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(4): 28-32. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200904007
[13]	Shi Qingxuan, Yang Kun, Jiang Weishan, Zhang Xinghu, Meng He. RESEARCH OF HSC COLUMNS BEHAVIOR CONFINED BY HIGH-STRENGTH STIRRUPS UNDER ECCENTRIC LOADING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(10): 76-80. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200910019
[14]	Wang Mingping, Geng Shujiang, Jiang Tao, Xu Yinghao, Wang Jing. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON BEARING CAPACITY OF ECCENTRICALLY LOADED R.C. COLUMNS WITH HRBF500 STEEL BARS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(11): 17-21. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200911005
[15]	Xu Jin, Cai Jian. RESEARCH ON THE BEHAVIOUR OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMN STRENGTHENED BY CIRCULAR STEEL JACKETING SUBJECTED TO ECCENTRIC LOADING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(8): 14-17. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200708004
[16]	Sun Tong, Wang Shi-qi, Hu Xia-min, Luo Wu-jian. RESEARCHES ON THE CALCULATION METHOD FOR BEARING CAPACITY OF CONCRETE FILLED STEEL TUBULAR COLUMNS UNDER ECCENTRIC LOAD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(5): 95-98. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200605025
[17]	Ma Shu-fang, Zhao Jun-hai, Wei Xue-ying. THEORY AND TEST INVESTIGATION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF CONCRETE FILLED STEEL TUBE UNDER ECCENTRIC COMPRESSION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(10): 79-80. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200610022
[18]	Deng Chujian, Kong Weixue, Zheng Yingren. ANALYSIS OF THE ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY OF JOINTED ROCK FOUNDATIONS BY FEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(12): 51-54. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200512015
[19]	Wang Xin, Li Gang, Sheng Qinzhu, Lu Zhoudao. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE FLY ASH BLOCK WALLS STRENGTHENED BY GLASS FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(7): 96-98. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200507028
[20]	Zhang Chunmei, Yin Yi, Zhou Yun. ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING AXIAL COMPRESSIVE BEARING CAPACITY OF CONCRETE-FILLED STEEL TUBE COLUMN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(10): 66-68. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200410020