PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF IMPROVEMENT PROFILED STEEL SHEET ROOFS WITH STANDING SEAM 360 PANELS AGAINST SUPER TYPHOONS BASED ON WIND-UPLIFT RESISTANCE TESTS

YI Guixiang; DUAN Weiyang; WANG Yue; SHI Xiajie; LI Jiaxing

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21120604

Volume 51 Issue 12

May 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2021 > 51(12): 79-83

Xu Qingyang, Li Aiqun, Ding Youliang, Shen Shungao, Hu Canyang. STUDY ON VERTICAL SEISMIC RESPONSE PASSIVE CONTROL OF LONG-SPAN MAINTENANCE HANGAR[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(11): 110-116. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201311025

Citation:

YI Guixiang, DUAN Weiyang, WANG Yue, SHI Xiajie, LI Jiaxing. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF IMPROVEMENT PROFILED STEEL SHEET ROOFS WITH STANDING SEAM 360 PANELS AGAINST SUPER TYPHOONS BASED ON WIND-UPLIFT RESISTANCE TESTS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(12): 79-83. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21120604

Citation:

PDF( 5211 KB)

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF IMPROVEMENT PROFILED STEEL SHEET ROOFS WITH STANDING SEAM 360 PANELS AGAINST SUPER TYPHOONS BASED ON WIND-UPLIFT RESISTANCE TESTS

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21120604

1. Inspection and Certification Co., Ltd., MCC Group, Beijing 100088, China;
2. National Industrial Building Construction Quality and Safety Supervision and Inspection Center, Beijing 100088, China;
3. Roof Tech (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing 100124, China

Received Date: 2021-12-06
Available Online: 2022-05-27

Abstract

Abstract

The profiled steel sheet roof system with standing seam 360 panels has been widely applied in China in recent years. Due to strong locking modes between ribs and supports, the panels are of stronger wind resistance compared with concealed gusset panels, 180-degree seams and aluminum-magnesium-manganese panels. Because of the limit of rib height, the conventional panels cannot meet the requirements of wind-uplift resistance and deformation for super typhoons. Analyzing the structure of the panels and the statistics of wind-uplift resistance for conventional panels, improved methods for the panels was presented. The capacity of the roof system with standing seam 360 panels of being improved by different measures was verified by tests of wind-uplift resistance. The test results showed the wind resistance of the roof system with high rib panels were greatly improved when other conditions remained the same.
- roof system of profiled steel sheet,
- wind-uplift resistance test,
- metal roof with standing seam 360 panel,
- super typhoon

FullText(HTML)

References(10)

References

[1]	秦国鹏, 刘美思, 刘毅, 等.金属屋面系统抗风揭性能的试验研究[J].钢结构, 2016, 31(3):26-28.
[2]	孙成疆.直立锁缝金属屋面系统在模拟极端暴风工况下抗风揭能力测试和分析[J].建筑结构, 2011, 41(增刊1):1438-1442.
[3]	李明, 殷小珠, 张伟, 等.直立锁边屋面抗风性能有限元分析[J].钢结构, 2017(8):72-76.
[4]	段威阳, 朱军, 易桂香.强风、台风多发区重要工业建/构筑物金属围护系统选型的重要性及方法[C]//2020年工业建筑学术交流会论文集(下册).北京:工业建筑杂志社, 2020:467-470.
[5]	何新亮, 徐廷波.360°直立锁缝金属屋面系统简析[C]//第二届全国金属围护系统行业大会暨2015年金属围护系统学术年会论文集.北京:中国钢结构协会房屋建筑钢结构分会、中国建筑防水协会金属屋面技术分会, 2015:57-62.
[6]	HARPER B A, KEPERT J D, GINGER J D.Guidelines for Converting Between Various Wind Averaging Periods in Tropical Cyclone Conditions[C]//Sixth Tropical Cyclone RSMCs.Brisbane:WCs Technical Coordination Meeting Technical Document.2009.
[7]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009-2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
[8]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.风力等级:GB/T 28591-2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2012.
[9]	中华人民共和国建设部.冷弯薄壁型钢结构技术规范:GB 50018-2002[S].北京:中国建计划出版社, 2012.
[10]	国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会.金属屋面抗风掀性能检测方法第1部分:静态压力法:GB/T 39794.1-2021[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2021.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZONG Zhongling, CEN Hang, MIAO Huiquan, HUANG Delong, TANG Aiping, LIU Qiang. Research Progress on Dynamic Response and Seismic Resistance of Helical Pile Foundations[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(2): 133-143. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23122904
[2]	YANG Dafeng, SUN Song, CHEN Feng, LIN Kangli, SHU Qianjin, CAO Cong. Research on the Influence of Coupling Effect Between Steel Valve Hall Structure and Equipment on the Seismic Response of 800 kV Wall Bushing[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(4): 99-107. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23112115
[3]	CHANG Hailin, LI Jie, PAN Changchun, ZHANG Jing. A New Method for Parameter Optimization of Friction Dampers Based on Optimization Algorithm[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(8): 154-160. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21060304
[4]	MEN Jinjie, ZHONG Xin, XUE Chen, LAN Tao, LI Ran, ZHANG Liang. Comfortable Level Analysis on Floors of Prefabricated Box-Plate Steel Structures with TMD and Their Vibration Control Study[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(1): 50-56. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22041411
[5]	YAN Xiaoyu, ZHAO Zhuo, WANG Jin. Research on Near-Fault Seismic Response of Rigid Frame Bridge Based on Shaking Table Test Considering SSI Effect[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(8): 140-146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21102801
[6]	YU Haiyang, HU Ju, ZHANG Guiyan, HUANG Yujun, ZHU Guofei, CUI Hongzhi, BAO Xiaohua. Research on Seismic Responses of Underground Structures Considering Influence of Contact Surfaces[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(12): 156-165. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21090402
[7]	HUANG Min, DUAN Jingmin, MAO Qingchao, WANG Jiakai. SEISMIC DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF TWIN TUNNELS WITH DIFFERENT LINING STIFFNESS IN MOUNTAINS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 39-46,63. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21040603
[8]	LIU Zhenlin, CHENG Yongfeng, LU Zhicheng, ZHANG Xiaojun, ZHU Zhubing, ZHANG Shujun. SHAKING TABLE TESTS OF ULTRA-HIGH-VOLTAGE TRANSFORMER MODELS WITH NONLINEAR VIBRATION ISOLATION DEVICES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(11): 19-24. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21052708
[9]	YANG Ke, ZHANG Wenhan, HUANG Yi. INFLUENCE ANALYSIS OF UNDERGROUND PIPE GALLERY ON NONLINEAR SEISMIC RESPONSE OF UPPER STRUCTURE AND RESEARCH ON IMPROVEMENT MEASURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(10): 211-216,162. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzg20111403
[10]	ZHOU Junwen, ZHAO Ming. ANALYSIS OF THE DYNAMIC RESPONSES OF LNG STORAGE TANK WITH UPLIFT CONSIDERING VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(4): 39-43,38. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202004007
[11]	BU Xianghang, CAO Yongxing, LIANG Huangbin, ZHU Jun, WU Chi, LIU Fenglian, XIE Qiang. NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS ON DYNAMIC RESPONSES OF A TRANSMISSION TOWER-CONDUCTOR COUPLING SYSTEM UNDER EARTHQUAKE ACTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(8): 128-133. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201908200007
[12]	Zhuang Peng, Xue Suduo, Han Miao. SEISMIC ISOLATION ANALYSIS OF SMA SPRING-FRICTION BEARINGS IN DOUBLE LAYER SPHERICAL LATTICE SHELL STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(1): 43-49. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201501008
[14]	Shen Wangxia, Li Zhongcheng. ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRA OF ELASTOPLASTIC RC STRUCTURES OF EXISTING NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(05): 61-64. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201405015
[15]	Nie lin, Yang Tao, Zhou Depei, Liu Yongjiang. ESTIMATE OF SLOPE DYNAMICAL STABILITY BASED ON EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE ANALYSIS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(11): 82-86. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201211018
[16]	Weng Guangyuan, Wang Sheliang. VERTICAL SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF LONG-SPAN SPHERICAL SHELL STRUCTURE SUBJECT TO INCONSISTENT EXCITATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(8): 91-95. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201108022
[17]	Liu Qiang, Zhou Ruizhong, Zou Zujun. DESIGN OF REDUCING SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MULTI-STOREY BUILDING BY TAKING ITS THERMAL-INSULATING ROOF AS TMD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(7): 11-15. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200807003
[18]	Wang Yuan-qing, Tan Cheng-dong, Zhang Yong. ANALYSIS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF ARCHED CORRUGATED METAL ROOF[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(8): 78-81. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200608024
[19]	Deng Jiming, Jiang Jianqun, Mao Genhai. NONLINEAR RESPONSE AND SEISMIC DESIGN OF STRUCTURES BASED ON ELASTOPLASTIC DYNAMIC ANALYSIS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(10): 1-5,55. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200410001