Comparisons of Design and Assessment Standards of Masonry Structures in China, the US and Europe

WU Lele; TANG Caoming; LUO Kaihai; CHENG Shaoge; HUANG Shimin

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21092702

Volume 52 Issue 6

Sep. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2022 > 52(6): 191-198

WU Lele, TANG Caoming, LUO Kaihai, CHENG Shaoge, HUANG Shimin. Comparisons of Design and Assessment Standards of Masonry Structures in China, the US and Europe[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(6): 191-198. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21092702

Citation:

WU Lele, TANG Caoming, LUO Kaihai, CHENG Shaoge, HUANG Shimin. Comparisons of Design and Assessment Standards of Masonry Structures in China, the US and Europe[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(6): 191-198. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21092702

Citation:

PDF( 1601 KB)

Comparisons of Design and Assessment Standards of Masonry Structures in China, the US and Europe

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21092702

1. China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China;
2. Research Center for Disaster Prevention, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Beijing 100013, China

Received Date: 2021-09-27
Available Online: 2022-09-05

Abstract

Abstract

The design and assessment standards of masonry structures in China, the US and Europe were briefly compared. The results showed that the US standard did not reduce the strength, and the European standard defined the adjustment method of partial coefficients. In the seismic assessment, the US and European standards adopted performance-based assessment methods, considering the influence of cognitive level, the representative values of gravity load and the calculation method of seismic bearing capacity were adjusted. The ultimate limit state function of bearing capacity in Chinese assessment and design standards were the same, which was conservative for the safety assessment of existing building structures. It was suggested to introduce the performance-based methods in the future revision of the Chinese assessment standards and modify the partial factors of the ultimate expression of bearing capacity according to the reliability theory.
- masonry structures,
- safety assessment,
- partial factor,
- the ultimate limit state functions of bearing capacity

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	ELLINGWOOD B R, RELIAELLINGWOOD B R. Reliability-based condition assessment assessment and LRFD for existing structures[J]. Structural Safety, 1996, 18(2/3):67-80.
[2]	ASP O, LAAKSONEN A. Background of target reliability levels for existing structures[J]. Safety, IABSE Symposium Report,2013, 100(5):252-259.
[3]	STEENBERGEN R D J M, SýKORA M, DIAMANTIDIS D, et al. Economic and human safety reliability levels for existing structures[J]. Structural Concrete,2015,16(3):323-332.
[4]	顾祥林,许勇,张伟平.既有建筑结构构件的安全性分析[J].建筑结构学报,2004,25(6):117-122.
[5]	黄炎生,邓浩,罗仁志.基于分项系数法的既有框架结构可靠性评估[J].华南理工大学学报,2008,36(12):34-37.
[6]	李英民,周小龙,罗文文,等.基于可靠性理论的既有结构楼面活荷载取值研究[J].建筑结构,2014,44(17):83-94.
[7]	The Masonry Standards Joint Committee. Building code requirements and specification for masonry structures:ACI 530[S]. USA:Amer Society of Civil Engineers, 2008.
[8]	American Society of Civil Engineers. Minimum Design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures:ASCE 7-16[S]. USA:American Society of Civil Engineers, 2016.
[9]	American Concrete Institute. Building code requirements for structural concrete:ACI 318-19[S]. USA:American Concrete Institute, 2019.
[10]	American Society of Civil Engineers. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing building:ASCE 41-17[S]. USA:American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017.
[11]	International Code Council. International existing building code:IEBC[S]. USA:International Code Council. International, INC, 2017.
[12]	The Standards Policy and Strategy Committee. Eurocode 6-Design of masonry structures-Part 1-1:general rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures:BS EN 1996-1-1:2005[S]. UK:British Standards Institution, 2005.
[13]	The Standards Policy and Strategy Committee. Basis of structural design:BS EN 1990:2002[S]. UK:British Standards Institution, 2002.
[14]	The Standards Policy and Strategy Committee. General rules, seismic action and rules for buildings:BS EN 1998-1:2004[S]. UK:British Standards Institution, 2004.
[15]	International Organization for Standardization. Bases for design of structures-assessment of existing structures:ISO 13822[S]. Switzerland:International Organization for Standardization, 2010.
[16]	Nederlands Norm. Assessment of existing structures in case of reconstruction and disapproval:Basic Rules:NEN 8700[S]. Nederland:NEN, 2011.
[17]	The Standards Policy and Strategy Committee. Eurocode 8-design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 3:assessment and retrofitting of buildings:BS EN1998-3:2005[S]. UK:British Standards Institution, 2005.
[18]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 砌体结构设计规范:GB 50003-2011[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.
[19]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑结构可靠性设计统一标准:GB 50068-2018[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2018.
[20]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震鉴定标准:GB 50023-2009[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.
[21]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.民用建筑可靠性鉴定标准:GB 50292-2015[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
[22]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009-2012[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
[23]	上海市建设和交通委员会. 既有建筑物结构检测与评定标准:DG/TJ08-804-2005[S]. 上海:同济大学出版社, 2005.

Relative Articles

[1]	HUANG Xigui, LUO Shengchang, LI Lixiao. Research on Wind Speed Profile Characteristics of Typhoon Boundary Layer Based on Measured Data[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(2): 98-105. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23121101
[2]	QIU Bin, LEI Honggang, SHEN Yu, JI Xuanzhe. Fatigue Load Spectrum Research of the Grid Structure Under Suspension Crane Loading[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(12): 143-151. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21102408
[3]	MA Yunlong, WANG Xiuli, FENG Zhujun, GOU Baolong, HOU Hongjie. RESEARCH ON STRENGTHENING DESIGN FOR JACKING OF A LONG-SPAN STEEL PLANT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(11): 205-210. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21061602
[4]	CHEN Zhengfa, ZHANG Jie, YAN Zhiguo, BIAN Minghui. STUDY OF WATER AND EARTH PRESSURE MODES ON SHIELD TUNNELS IN WATER-RICH DIORITE STRATA[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 25-30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21031806
[5]	LI Zhaoyang, PAN Xinzhong, YU Bo. NONLINEAR ANALYSIS AND FIELD TEST VERIFICATION OF STEEL TUBULAR SCAFFOLDS UNDER CONSTRUCTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(9): 112-117. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201904160007
[6]	LIU Weiran, YU Haifeng, HUANG Jun, YU Yue, DU Shoujun, GAO Renqing, CHEN Zengshun, WANG Qihua, LIU Ze. MEASUREMENT AND FORCED ANALYSIS OF FORMWORK SUPPORTING FRAME WITH NEW PULLEY-CLIP STYLE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(9): 118-121,146. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201904210001
[9]	Hu Changming, Liu Fengyun, Yang Jianhua, Zhao Yunbo, Ren Wenjun, Cai Suping. ON-SITE MEASUREMENT AND ANSYS ANALYSIS OF CANTILEVER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(4): 136-142. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201504026
[10]	Lin Zhangzhang, Zhang Yi, Yang Junjie. ANALYSIS OF MULTI-STORY FORMWORK SUPPORTING SYSTEM BY DETECTION AND FEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(2): 94-98. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201302019
[11]	Hu Changming, Wang Jie, Li Jiatao, Liu Fengyun. THE FULL ANALYSIS OF HIGH SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR FORMWORK DURING THE CONSTRUCT OF THE ROOF[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(2): 88-93,133. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201302018
[12]	Chen Xu. STUDY ON FIELD MEASUREMENT OF HIGH-FORMWORK WITH A HEIGHT OF 15 m[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(8): 106-108. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201308023
[13]	Zhang Xuezhi, Zhang Xuefeng, Ying Yimiao, Wang Senjun. ACTUAL MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HIGH FORM STRUT OF FASTENER-STYLE STEEL PIPE SCAFFOLD SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(1): 15-18. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201101004
[14]	Zhuang Jinping, Cai Xuefeng, Lin Zengzhong, Zhou Jizhong, Lin Huaqiang. SITE MEASUREMENT AND DISCUSSION ON MODIFYING METHOD OF BEARING CAPACITY FORMULA OF SUPER HIGH OR LARGE-SPAN FORM STRUT SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(9): 94-99. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201109021
[15]	Zeng Fankui, Hu Changming, Yan Xin, Dong Pan, Mei Yuan. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON STABILITY OF COUPLER STEEL TUBE FALSEWORK[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(2): 28-31. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201002007
[16]	Zeng Fankui, Hu Changming, Ge Zhaoshen, Yan Xin. STUDY ON VALUE OF EFFECTIVE LENGTH COEFFICIENT OF UPRINGT STANCHION OF COUPLER STEEL TUBE FALSEWORK[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(2): 24-27. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201002006
[17]	Hu Changming, Liu Hongliang, Zeng Fankui, Ge Zhaoshen, Yin Hongbing. RESEARCH ADVANCES FOR COUPLER IN RESEARCH ON STEEL TUBE TALL FALSEWORK[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(2): 1-6. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201002001
[18]	Hu Changming, Mei Yuan, Dong Pan, Zhang Xiaoyong. ANALYSIS AND STUDY ON THE BEARING CAPACITY REDUCTION FACTOR OF COUPLER TALL FALSEWORK[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(2): 12-16. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201002003
[19]	Wang Xin, Yang Shirong, Feng Yonggang. THE ON-SITE TEST OF PUMPING PRESSURE OF CONCRETE-FILLED STEEL TUBE PUMPING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(12): 98-101. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200912024
[20]	Wang Yingge. FIELD TEST AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERACTION OF PILE- RAFT FOUNDATION ULTRA - HIGH TUBE-IN-TUBE STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(5): 10-15. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200505003