Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
YU Haiyang, HU Ju, ZHANG Guiyan, HUANG Yujun, ZHU Guofei, CUI Hongzhi, BAO Xiaohua. Research on Seismic Responses of Underground Structures Considering Influence of Contact Surfaces[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(12): 156-165. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21090402
Citation: YU Haiyang, HU Ju, ZHANG Guiyan, HUANG Yujun, ZHU Guofei, CUI Hongzhi, BAO Xiaohua. Research on Seismic Responses of Underground Structures Considering Influence of Contact Surfaces[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(12): 156-165. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21090402

Research on Seismic Responses of Underground Structures Considering Influence of Contact Surfaces

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21090402
  • Received Date: 2021-09-04
    Available Online: 2023-03-22
  • A water-soil coupling finite element analysis for the dynamic response of underground structure in the liquefiable site during and after earthquakes was performed. In the calculation, the water-soil fully coupled finite element-finite difference method based on the effective stress theory and the CM model (the Cyclic Mobility model) accurately reflected the dynamic characterisitcs of soil under cyclic loads were adopted. Considering the structural volume effect, the hybrid elements composed of elastic beams and columns were used to construct the model of the station structure, and the joint elements at soil-structure interfaces were set. The acceleration response of soil during a rare earthquake, the development of excess pore water pressure, the internal force of the underground structure and the consolidation settlement after the earthquake were simulated and analyzed. The results showed that the underground structure continued to float up after the earthquake, and the displacement development after the earthquake was significantly greater than that during the earthquake. When the excess pore pressure almost completely dissipated, the structure settlement tended to be stable.
  • [1]
    GOODMAN R E, TAYLOR R L, BREKKE T L A. A model for the mechanics of jointed rock[J]. ASCE Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division Journal, 1968, 99(5):637-659.
    [2]
    DESAI C S, ZAMAN M M, LIGHTNER J G, et al. Thin-layer element for interfaces and joints[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1984, 8(1):19-43.
    [3]
    ZIENKIEWICZ O C, PANDE G N. Time-dependent multilaminate model of rocks:a numerical study of deformation and failure of rock masses[J]. International Journal for Numerical & Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2010, 1(3):219-247.
    [4]
    LIU S T, LI P Z, ZHANG W Y, et al. Experimental study and numerical simulation on dynamic soil-structure interaction under earthquake excitations[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 138.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106333.
    [5]
    刘光磊, 宋二祥, 刘华北, 等. 饱和砂土地层中隧道结构动力离心模型试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 29(8):2070-2076.
    [6]
    路德春, 王欣, 罗磊, 等. 土与结构接触特性对地下结构地震反应的影响研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2017, 37(2):177-186.
    [7]
    叶冠林. DBLEAVES手册[M]. 上海:上海交通大学出版社, 2013.
    [8]
    陈云敏, 韩超, 凌道盛, 等. ZJU400离心机研制及其振动台性能评价[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(12):1887-1894.
    [9]
    凌道盛, 郭恒, 蔡武军, 等. 地铁车站地震破坏离心机振动台模型试验研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2012, 46(12):2201-2209.
    [10]
    郭恒. 地铁车站地震响应离心机模型试验研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2012.
    [11]
    ZHANG F, YE B, NODA T, et al. Explanation of cyclic mobility of soils:approach by stress-induced anisotropy[J]. Soils & Foundations, 2011, 47(4):635-648.
    [12]
    ZHANG F, YE B, YE G L. Unified description of sand behavior[J]. Frontiers of Architecture & Civil Engineering in China, 2011, 5(2):121-150.
    [13]
    HASHIGUCHI K. Sub-loading surface model in unconventional plasticity[J]. International Journal of Solids & Structures, 1989, 25(8):917-945.
    [14]
    ASAOKA A. Super-loading yield surface concept for the saturated structured soils[C]//Proc European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering. 1998.
    [15]
    YE B, YE G L, ZHANG F, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation of repeated liquefaction-consolidation of sand[J]. Soils & Foundations, 2007, 47(3):547-558.
    [16]
    KHERADI H, YE B, NISHI H, et al. Optimum pattern of ground improvement for enhancing seismic resistance of existing box culvert buried in soft ground[J]. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology, 2017, 69:187-202.
    [17]
    Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. FLAC3D, Fast Lagrangian analysis of continua in 3 dimensions, version 3.0, user's manual[M]. Minneapolis:Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., 2005.
    [18]
    BAO X H, XIA Z F, et al. Numerical analysis on the seismic behavior of a large metro subway tunnel in liquefiable ground[J]. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology, 2017, 66:91-106.
    [19]
    MEHRZAD B, HADDAD A, JAFARIAN Y. Centrifuge and numerical models to investigate liquefaction-induced response of shallow foundations with different contact pressures[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 14(2):117-131.
    [20]
    LIU H B, SONG E X. Seismic response of large underground structures in liquefiable soils subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations[J]. Computers & Geotechnics, 2005, 32(4):223-244.
    [21]
    CHEN G X, CHEN S, ZUO X, et al. Shaking-table tests and numerical simulations on a subway structure in soft soil[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 76(S1):13-28.
    [22]
    CHEN S, ZHUANG H Y, QUAN D Z, et al. Shaking table test on the seismic response of large-scale subway station in a loess site:a case study[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 123:173-184.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Wei, ZHANG Lei, CHENG Xinyue. Research on Spatial Forms and Types of Subway Entrances and Exits in Hot-Summer and Cold-Winter Areas[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(6): 75-83. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22081308
    [2]LI Linru, ZHANG Dong, SHI Chunhua. Research on Pattern Evolution of Traditionally Rural Settlements Adjacent to Waters in Yiluo River Basin[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(11): 104-110. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21092613
    [3]YUAN Hong, YAO Qiang, XU Na, HE Yuan. A Comparative Study on Land Use and Spatial Forms of Urban-Centered TOD Areas in the US and Japan[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(4): 209-218. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21021702
    [4]JIANG Xiyuan, HE Runxian, ZHOU Bo. RESEARCH ON DIAOLOU DWELLINGS IN NAXIDAGU TOWN OF LUZHOU, SICHUAN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(2): 12-17. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20062304
    [5]JIN Kewei, WANG Wei. RESEARCH ON SKY-VIEW FACTOR OF HIGH-DENSITY URBAN RESIDENTIAL AREAS BASED ON GIS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(2): 1-6,75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20080605
    [6]ZHOU Zaihui, REN Yunying. ANALYSIS OF URBAN SPATIAL FORMS IN WUWEI FROM 1990 TO 2016[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(7): 120-126. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG19113048
    [7]CHEN Jing, HAO Xinyi, YANG Li. STUDY ON THE SPATIAL FORM OF SILO-CAVE VILLAGE IN THE WEST OF HENAN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 8-12. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005002
    [8]CHEN Jing, YANG Li, HAO Xinyi. THE SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS OF ANCIENT TOWNS FOR SHENHOU TOWN INDEPENDENT INDUSTRY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 1-7. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005001
    [15]Wang Run. RESEARCH ON THE FORM OF THE EXTERNAL FRINGE SPACE IN WATERFRONT BUILDING IN WUZHEN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(11): 67-70. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz2001411012
    [16]Xie Ke, Xie Zhenlin. THE REFLECTION OF SOCIAL CULTURE IDEAS OF INTERIOR SPACE AND ORDER OF HUIZHOU ANCIENT FOLK DWELLINGS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(05): 7-11.
    [17]Liang Jingyun. THE VISUAL ARTS IN THE DESIGN OF INDUSTRIAL LANDSCAPE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(2): 59-60,103. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201302012
    [18]Zhao Yongbo. THE TECHNICAL PLAN OF HIGH RISE OFFICE BUILDING'S ENCLOSURE SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(11): 41-42,38. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200511012
    [19]Huang Jihong, Mao Qingxi, Yu Huili. INVESTIGATION ON AIRFLOW DISTRIBUTION IN SPACE OF INDUSTRIAL ARCHITECTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(8): 17-18. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200408005
    [20]Huang Xingling, Wang Yu, Shen chunhong. ANALYSIS OF FORM CHARACTERISTIC OF TODAY'S EXTERIOR INHABITABLE ENVIRONMENT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(6): 28-30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200406010
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 王崇恩,王鑫悦. 广灵地区传统民居建筑空间形态解析——以宋窑村宋氏宅院为例. 城市建筑. 2025(03): 154-158 .
    2. 曾志群,潘永刚,王成明. 川东北山地农村夯土民居建筑空间形态解析. 小城镇建设. 2024(09): 110-117 .
    3. 张保伟,杨天予. 传统建筑组群视角下杨桥古镇的保护与传承研究. 上海房地. 2023(10): 15-18 .
    4. 潘辉,苏汶山,王薇,胡春. 山东传统民居主要类型及建筑特征解析. 住宅科技. 2023(10): 30-34+63 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 5.1 %FULLTEXT: 5.1 %META: 93.7 %META: 93.7 %PDF: 1.1 %PDF: 1.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.3 %其他: 14.3 %上海: 1.1 %上海: 1.1 %北京: 1.7 %北京: 1.7 %十堰: 1.1 %十堰: 1.1 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %天津: 1.7 %天津: 1.7 %太原: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %宿州: 1.1 %宿州: 1.1 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %张家口: 5.7 %张家口: 5.7 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %扬州: 1.1 %扬州: 1.1 %无锡: 0.6 %无锡: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %曲靖: 1.1 %曲靖: 1.1 %朝阳: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %格兰特县: 0.6 %格兰特县: 0.6 %武汉: 4.6 %武汉: 4.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %淄博: 0.6 %淄博: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %湖州: 1.7 %湖州: 1.7 %漯河: 9.7 %漯河: 9.7 %芒廷维尤: 15.4 %芒廷维尤: 15.4 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %荆州: 0.6 %荆州: 0.6 %衡阳: 0.6 %衡阳: 0.6 %西宁: 18.9 %西宁: 18.9 %贵阳: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.6 %运城: 4.6 %运城: 4.6 %邯郸: 1.1 %邯郸: 1.1 %郑州: 2.3 %郑州: 2.3 %长沙: 1.1 %长沙: 1.1 %黄山: 0.6 %黄山: 0.6 %其他上海北京十堰南京南通合肥天津太原宿州常德张家口成都扬州无锡晋城曲靖朝阳杭州格兰特县武汉沈阳济南淄博温州湖州漯河芒廷维尤苏州荆州衡阳西宁贵阳运城邯郸郑州长沙黄山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (81) PDF downloads(3) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return