Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Chen Aoyi, Zhang Zhaoyi, Wang Hui, Yang Zhiyan, Zhang Jiaqi. CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIALIZATION AND GREEN MODULE BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(06): 108-111. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201406024
Citation: QU Zhihao, HUANG Feng, Zheng Aichen, GAO Xiaoye. Experimental Study on the Influence of Joint Fillers on the Crack Initiation Strength of Rock Masses[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(8): 175-179. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062915

Experimental Study on the Influence of Joint Fillers on the Crack Initiation Strength of Rock Masses

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062915
  • Received Date: 2021-06-29
    Available Online: 2022-12-01
  • Three kinds of materials—cement, mud and gypsum, were used as fillers to fill jointed rock specimens with single crack, and uniaxial compression tests were conducted on the specimens. The analytical expression about initiation strength of crack for closed crack under uniaxial compression was established and numerical simulations were performed to further study it. The results showed that under uniaxial compression, the initiation strength of crack for specimens simulated by the friction coefficient theory was basically consistent with the peak strength from indoor tests. The larger the friction coefficients of fillers were, the less easier the damage of jointed rock masses, and the initiation strength of crack for rock masses with fillers was greatly improved than that without fillers. The peak strength of cement-filled jointed specimens was highest and mud-filled jointed specimens was lowest. Shear failure was the main failure mode of specimens filled with mud, the failure form of specimens filled with cement and gypsum was complex. With the increase of filler strength, the failure mode of jointed rock mass would change from shear failure to tension failure.
  • [1]
    吴雪萍, 邱一平, 曹兴国, 等. 单轴压缩下含闭合裂纹大理岩板裂纹扩展的研究J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2015(7):30-33.
    [2]
    WU S, LI K, YANG Z, et al. Complex analytical study of the stability of tunnel-surrounding rock in a layered jointed rock mass[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020. DOI: 10.1155/2020/5473059.
    [3]
    KULATILAKE P, HE W, UM J, et al. A physical model study of jointed rock mass strength under uniaxial compressive loading[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2015, 34(3/4). DOI: 10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00123-8.
    [4]
    XIONG L X, CHEN H J, LI T B, et al. Experimental study on the uniaxial compressive strength of artificial jointed rock mass specimen after high temperatures[J]. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 2018(4): 201-213.
    [5]
    邵伟, 陈有亮, 周有成. 单轴压缩条件下含闭合双裂纹体岩石类材料的破坏机理[J]. 上海大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 17(2): 216-220.
    [6]
    LIU G, JIANG Q H, XIONG F, et al. Experimental study of crack propagation and deformation of multiple-jointed rock mass[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37:151-158.
    [7]
    张波, 李术才, 张敦福,等. 含充填节理岩体相似材料试件单轴压缩试验及断裂损伤研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2012(6):1647-1652.
    [8]
    史玲,蔡美峰,赵坚.充填节理破坏机理及实验[J].北京科技大学学报, 2012, 34(3): 253-259.
    [9]
    周喆, 张亮, 侯恒军. 填充对节理岩体力学特性及能量演化的影响研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2020,51(7):117-123.
    [10]
    刘婷婷, 李建春, 李海波,等. 剪切速率对平直充填节理的剪切力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2017,38(7):1967-1973

    ,1989.
    [11]
    杨庆, 王超. 基于扩展有限元的压剪复合断裂数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2011(增刊2):568-572.
    [12]
    王辉, 高召宁, 孟祥瑞,等. 单一闭合裂纹在单轴压缩下对岩体破裂过程的影响[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2015(2):56-61.
    [13]
    刘福生, 薛一峰, 杨杰. 填充节理直剪试验颗粒流模拟[J]. 水利水电技术, 2020, 51(3):163-174.
    [14]
    高啸也. 断层破碎带隧道围岩变形破坏机理研究[D]. 重庆:重庆交通大学, 2018.
    [15]
    李银平, 伍佑伦, 杨春和. 岩石类材料滑动裂纹模型[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(2):278-284.
    [16]
    YOON J. Application of experimental design and optimization to PFC model calibration in uniaxial compression simulation[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(6):871-889.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]XING Guolei, LI Shouying, WU Yingqiang, LIU Min, WANG Yongfeng. Research on Wind-Induced Responses of a Solar Tower in CSP Station Based on Aeroelastic Model Test[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(6): 148-152,160. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21101208
    [2]XIA Liang, ZHANG Mingshan, LI Benyue. WIND-INDUCED VIBRATION ANALYSIS AND WIND-RESISTANT DESIGN OF A CANTILEVERED STRING STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(5): 93-98,195. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20032402
    [3]HAN Miao, LI Shuangchi, DU Hongkai, LI Wanjun, HAN Rong. ANALYSIS ON WIND VIBRATION RESPONSE AND DAMPING VIBRATION REDUCTION OF LONG-SPAN GRID STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 114-120. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005019
    [4]HUANG Peng, LIN Huatan, GU Ming. THE WIND TUNNEL TEST OF THE AEROELASTIC MODEL OF A STADIUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 64-68. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201906280004
    [12]Sun Binyan, Zhang Xuwei, Chen Jiaguang. VIBRATION MODES COUPLING EFFECT IN THE WIND-INDUCED RESPONSE OF A LONG SPAN ROOF[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(8): 139-143. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201208027
    [13]Shu Xingping, Yan Xinghua, Zou Hao. SIMULATION OF FLUCTUATING WIND LOAD ON ANGLE-STEEL COMMUNICATION TOWER AND ANALYSIS OF WIND-INDUCED VIBRATION RESPONSES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(4): 119-123. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201104025
    [14]Yang Yinghua, Wei Jun, Feng Zhen, Chen Chuanzheng. STUDY OF WIND-INDUCED VIBRATION RESPONSES AND WIND-INDUCED VIBRATION FACTOR FOR LONG-SPAN GABLE ROOFS SUPPORTED BY STEEL TRUSSES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(1): 124-129. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201101028
    [15]Zhang Jian-sheng, Wu Yue, Shen Shi-zhao. STUDY ON WIND-INDUCED VIBRATION OF SINGLE-LAYER CYLINDRICAL RETICULATED SHELL STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(10): 69-71. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200610019
    [16]Yang Dongsheng, Lan Zongjian. STUDY ON WIND-INDUCED RESPONSE OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL VIBRATION-ABSORPTION MEGAFRAME STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(1): 30-32. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200501009
    [17]Wang Heng, Sun Bingnan, Lou Wenjuan, Shen Guohui, . CALCULATION OF WIND-INDUCED VIBRATION FACTOR OF ROOF FOR TAIZHOU STADIUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(4): 82-84,94. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200504024
    [18]Wang Yuanqing, Ren Zhihong, Shi Yongjiu, Wu Lili. WIND VIBRATION ANALYSIS OF FISH-BELLIED FLEXIBLE SUPPORTING SYSTEM FOR POINT-SUPPORTED GLASS BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(2): 23-26. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200502006
    [19]Xue Weichen, Huang Yongjia, Wang Guinian. PROTOTYPE EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON FLEXIBLE FLANGES FOR LONG-SPAN ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION TOWER IN WUSONGKOU[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(3): 68-70. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200403021
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 曾璧环,池曦锵,张佳毅,杨德栋,曹枚根. 海岛输电塔线体系风振响应及易损性分析. 山东电力技术. 2024(01): 24-34 .
    2. 朱薇薇,加永登增,侯栋,孙禄,周甘霖. 藏东高压输电线路设计中线条风荷载计算对比. 甘肃科技. 2023(05): 51-56 .
    3. 舒赣平,罗柯镕,王章轩,朱姣,余亮,墨泽,宁帅朋. 385m超大型长江大跨越输电塔铸钢节点受力性能研究. 工业建筑. 2022(08): 34-40+47 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040123456
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.6 %FULLTEXT: 9.6 %META: 86.4 %META: 86.4 %PDF: 4.0 %PDF: 4.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 15.2 %其他: 15.2 %北京: 4.5 %北京: 4.5 %南京: 1.0 %南京: 1.0 %呼伦贝尔: 0.5 %呼伦贝尔: 0.5 %天津: 1.0 %天津: 1.0 %太原: 0.5 %太原: 0.5 %安康: 0.5 %安康: 0.5 %常德: 1.0 %常德: 1.0 %平凉: 1.0 %平凉: 1.0 %广州: 1.5 %广州: 1.5 %张家口: 1.0 %张家口: 1.0 %徐州: 0.5 %徐州: 0.5 %无锡: 1.0 %无锡: 1.0 %昆明: 3.5 %昆明: 3.5 %晋城: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %朝阳: 2.5 %朝阳: 2.5 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %武汉: 1.0 %武汉: 1.0 %沈阳: 1.0 %沈阳: 1.0 %济南: 0.5 %济南: 0.5 %温州: 1.0 %温州: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %潍坊: 1.0 %潍坊: 1.0 %秦皇岛: 1.0 %秦皇岛: 1.0 %芒廷维尤: 9.1 %芒廷维尤: 9.1 %芝加哥: 1.5 %芝加哥: 1.5 %西宁: 28.8 %西宁: 28.8 %西安: 1.0 %西安: 1.0 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 3.5 %运城: 3.5 %郑州: 2.0 %郑州: 2.0 %重庆: 2.0 %重庆: 2.0 %铁岭: 3.5 %铁岭: 3.5 %长沙: 2.0 %长沙: 2.0 %阿坝: 0.5 %阿坝: 0.5 %青岛: 1.0 %青岛: 1.0 %黄山: 0.5 %黄山: 0.5 %黄石: 1.0 %黄石: 1.0 %其他北京南京呼伦贝尔天津太原安康常德平凉广州张家口徐州无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉沈阳济南温州漯河潍坊秦皇岛芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁西安贵阳运城郑州重庆铁岭长沙阿坝青岛黄山黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (297) PDF downloads(1) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return