Review, Thinking and Enlightenment of “Big Dig” in the Context of Urban Renewal in the United States

REN Haoqi

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21062516

Volume 53 Issue 8

Aug. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2023 > 53(8): 212-216,183

REN Haoqi. Review, Thinking and Enlightenment of “Big Dig” in the Context of Urban Renewal in the United States[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(8): 212-216,183. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062516

Citation:

REN Haoqi. Review, Thinking and Enlightenment of “Big Dig” in the Context of Urban Renewal in the United States[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(8): 212-216,183. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062516

Citation:

PDF( 3077 KB)

Review, Thinking and Enlightenment of “Big Dig” in the Context of Urban Renewal in the United States

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062516

REN Haoqi

School of Architecture, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 457000, China

Received Date: 2021-06-25
Available Online: 2023-10-17

Abstract

Abstract

The renewal and construction of major transportation facilities can reshape the new development pattern of the city and have a multi-dimensional impact on the city. In the era of comprehensive quality improvement, the renewal and construction of large-scale city area should be people-oriented, accurately positioned, and based on the long-term plan. The typical case of "Big Dig" in Boston was selected to systematically analyze its macro research background, and analyze the renewal process of the project during the period of "fragmentation, stitching and rebirth" and its impact on the urban development of Boston in detail, so as to construct the connection between its urban renewal value orientation, design strategy, renewal mechanism and the context of urban renewal in the United States, and bring certain enlightenment.
- urban renewal,
- humanism,
- value orientation,
- design strategy,
- renewal mechanism

FullText(HTML)

References(28)

References

[1]	沈杰,蔡强新,苟中华.大城市更新改造工程与可持续发展:概析波士顿中央干道/隧道改建工程[J].建筑学报,2008(5):47-50.
[2]	王伟强. 从"大开挖"项目看"城市思维"[N]. 文汇报,2017-02-17(W16).
[3]	李晓颖,王浩.城市废弃基础设施的有机重生:波士顿"大开挖"(The Big Dig)项目[J].中国园林,2013,29(2):20-25.
[4]	董贺轩,刘乾,李双婷.城市灰绿两色基础设施整合下的大型公共空间建设:从波士顿经验到当代实践[J].中国园林,2017,33(10):113-118.
[5]	邵明,戈晓宇.供给侧改革背景下的城市绿色基础设施更新途径研究:以美国交通基础设施绿色化案例为例[J].工业建筑,2017,47(6):178-183.
[6]	王玮.都市新景观:波士顿罗斯·肯尼迪绿道[J].南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计版),2014(3):175-179.
[7]	钱七虎,王秀文. 美国波士顿地下空间开发利用与城市更新[C]//钱七虎院士论文选集. 北京:中国岩石力学与工程学会,2007.
[8]	俞孔坚.新唐人街:波士顿的中国城公园[J].建筑学报,2008(3):60-63.
[9]	MAGDALENA R. Integrating art into places in Transition-Rose Kennedy Greenway in Boston as a case study[J]. IOP Conference Series:Materials Science and Engineering,2017,245(5):5.
[10]	JACK A. Greenways as a planning strategy[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,1995,33(1):131-155.
[11]	王蒙徽.实施城市更新行动[J].住宅科技,2021,41(1):1-3.
[12]	姚之浩,曾海鹰.1950年代以来美国城市更新政策工具的演化与规律特征[J].国际城市规划,2018,33(4):18-24.
[13]	张汉,宋林飞.英美城市更新之国内学者研究综述[J].城市问题,2008(2):78-83,89.
[14]	方可.西方城市更新的发展历程及其启示[J].城市规划汇刊,1998(1):59-61,51 -66.
[15]	李艳玲.对美国城市更新运动的总体分析与评价[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2001(6):77-84.
[16]	曲凌雁.美国的城市更新与社区开发比较[J].国外城市规划,1998(3):11-14.
[17]	单皓.二战后美国城市的发展[J].城市规划,2003(6):72-80.
[18]	程大林,张京祥.城市更新:超越物质规划的行动与思考[J].城市规划,2004(2):70-73.
[19]	李建波,张京祥.中西方城市更新演化比较研究[J].城市问题,2003(5):68-71,49.
[20]	LORETTA L. Super-gentrification:the case of brooklyn heights, New York City[J]. Urban Studies,2003,40(12):2487-2488.
[21]	LORETTA L. A reappraisal of gentrification:towards a "geography of gentrification"[J]. Progress in Human Geography,2000,24(3):402-404.
[22]	王一名,伍江,周鸣浩.城市更新与地方经济:全球化危机背景下的争论、反思与启示[J].国际城市规划,2020,35(3):1-8.
[23]	黄婷,郑荣宝,张雅琪.基于文献计量的国内外城市更新研究对比分析[J].城市规划,2017,41(5):111-121.
[24]	MASS G. Project background[EB/OL].[2021-03-13].http://www.masspike.com/bigdig/background/index.html.
[25]	MASS G. The Big Dig[EB/OL].[2021-03-13].http://www.masspike.com/bigdig/index.html.
[26]	高雅,杨兵.规划赋能下伦敦东区科创驱动式城市更新实践[J].国际城市规划,2020,35(6):135-143.
[27]	张婷,解永庆,刘涛.创新城区导向的城市更新策略:分析框架与国际经验[J].上海城市规划,2019(5):123-128.
[28]	王佳文,叶裕民,董珂.从效率优先到以人为本:基于"城市人理论"的国土空间规划价值取向思考[J].城市规划学刊,2020(6):19-26.