Research on Fatigue Property of Novel Composite Decks with Large-Scale Corrugated Steel Plate and UHPC Layer

LIU Cong; SUN Hongtao; DUAN Shouhui; OUYANG Song; GAO Lili

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21061009

Volume 54 Issue 3

Mar. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2024 > 54(3): 161-166

Chen Zongping, Xu Jinjun, Huang Kaiwang, Su Yisheng. TEST STUDY ON BOND PROPERTIES BETWEEN HIGH STRENGTH STEEL BAR AND RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(11): 16-20. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201311004

Citation:

LIU Cong, SUN Hongtao, DUAN Shouhui, OUYANG Song, GAO Lili. Research on Fatigue Property of Novel Composite Decks with Large-Scale Corrugated Steel Plate and UHPC Layer[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(3): 161-166. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21061009

Citation:

PDF( 5478 KB)

Research on Fatigue Property of Novel Composite Decks with Large-Scale Corrugated Steel Plate and UHPC Layer

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21061009

Beijing General Municipal Engineering Design&Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100088, China

Received Date: 2021-06-10
Available Online: 2024-05-29

Abstract

Abstract

Based on the current studies of various composite bridge decks, a novel composite deck with large-scale corrugated steel plate and ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) layer is proposed. The fatigue property of the composite deck will be enhanced by increasing rigidity through the high-performance of UHPC and decreasing weld joints through large-scale corrugated steel plate. With the fatigue studies of the novel composite decks, it can be found that the increase of the UHPC thickness and the decrease of the diaphragm distance will reduce the fatigue stress amplitude of all fatigue details, so a UHPC thickness of 70–90 cm and a spacing of less than 4 cm between diaphragms are recommended. The increase of the U-rib height will also reduce the stress amplitude of almost all fatigue details, except the fatigue detail between the web of the U-rib and the diaphragm. Meanwhile, the UHPC thickness and the reinforcement ratio are the critical factors of the fatigue property of the UHPC layer. For the UHPC layer with the thickness less than 9 cm, the limitation of the minimum reinforcement ratio will ensure the fatigue property of the UHPC layer.

FullText(HTML)

References(13)

References

[1]	邵旭东,曹君辉,易笃韬,等.正交异性钢板-薄层RPC组合桥面基本性能研究[J].中国公路学报, 2012, 25(2):40-45.
[2]	李嘉,李杰,邵旭东,等.钢板-超薄UHPC-TPO组合桥面静力和疲劳试验研究[J].土木工程学报, 2017, 50(11):98-106.
[3]	SHAO X D, QU W T, CAO J H, et, al. Static and fatigue properties of the steel-UHPC lightweight composite bridge deck with large U ribs[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018(9), 148:491-507.
[4]	邵旭东,罗军,曹君辉,等.钢-UHPC轻型组合桥面板结构试验及裂缝宽度计算研究[J].土木工程学报, 2019, 52(3):61-75.
[5]	WANG Y, SHAO X D, CAO J H. Experimental study on basic performances of reinforced UHPC bridge deck with coarse aggregates[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2019, 24(12):1-11.
[6]	张清华,张鹏,刘益铭,等.新型大纵肋正交异性组合桥面板力学性能研究[J].桥梁建设, 2017, 47(3):30-35.
[7]	叶华文,王应良,张清华,等.新型正交异性钢-混组合桥面板足尺模型疲劳试验[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2017, 49(9):25-32.
[8]	LIU Y M, ZHANG Q H, MENG W N, et, al. Transverse fatigue behavior of steel-UHPC composite deck with large-size U-ribs[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 180(2):388-399.
[9]	胡苏,苏庆田,吴冲.正交异性钢-混凝土组合桥面板截面优化研究[J].结构工程师, 2015, 31(2):131-137.
[10]	张清华,程震宇,廖贵星,等.波形顶板-UHPC组合桥面板优化设计[J].西南交通大学学报, 2018, 53(4):670-678.
[11]	中华人民共和国交通运输部.公路钢结构桥梁设计规范:JTG D64-2015[S].北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司, 2015.
[12]	MCS-EPFL. Ultra-high performance fibre reinforced cementbased composites (UHPFRC):construction material, dimensioning and application:SIA 2052[S]. Zurich:Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2016.
[13]	邵旭东,郑晗,黄细军,等.钢-UHPC轻型组合桥面板横向受力性能[J].中国公路学报, 2017, 30(9):70-77.

Relative Articles

[1]	XIE Weidong, NIE Jun, ZHANG Ji, ZHANG Guangjie, WANG Lei. Experimental Research on Parallel Cylinder Reticulated Shell Closed Cargo Sheds Under Wind Load[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(11): 196-202. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23021314
[2]	LIN Songwei, OU Tong, LUO Jiexin, HE Hui, LIU Yanhui. Vibration Reduction Analysis of Landscape Towers with Variable Damping TMDs Based on Wind Tunnel Tests[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 138-143,121. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21073103
[3]	XIA Shunjun, ZHAO Jun, MA Long, ZHANG Renqiang, DAI Ruzhang, LI Ximin. Wind Tunnel Test Study on Crane Structure with Double-Flat-Arm Derrick for Long-Span Transmission Towers[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 1-7,74. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21100918
[4]	ZHANG Tao, GU Ziqi, CHEN Fubin. Study on Non-Gaussian Characteristics and Peak Factors of Fluctuating Wind Pressure on a Special-Shaped Curved Roof Structure[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 94-101. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22052611
[5]	ZHONG Weijun, XU Haiwei, YAO Jianfeng, LOU Wenjuan, GUO Gaopeng. Wind Tunnel Study on Precise Drag Coefficients of UHVDC Transmission Towers[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(8): 9-15. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20101801
[6]	HUANG Peng, LIN Huatan, GU Ming. THE WIND TUNNEL TEST OF THE AEROELASTIC MODEL OF A STADIUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 64-68. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201906280004
[7]	LIU Shi, YANG Yi, HUANG Zheng, GAO Qingshui, ZHANG Chu, LI Zhengliang, WANG Zhisong. STUDY ON COLLAPSE STATES OF TRANSMISSION TOWERS BY WIND-TUNNEL TESTS OF TOWER-LINE SYSTEMS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(10): 145-151. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzGYJZ201907150004
[8]	HAN Miao, LI Shuangchi, DU Hongkai, LI Wanjun, HAN Rong. ANALYSIS ON WIND VIBRATION RESPONSE AND DAMPING VIBRATION REDUCTION OF LONG-SPAN GRID STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 114-120. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005019
[9]	Tian Chenghao, Yu Yang, Dong Cheng, Liu Ming. PRESTRESS RECONSTRUCTION DESIGN FOR ANTI-RAIN AND SNOW OF THE EXISTING MULTI-SPAN CABLE TRUSS WAVE CANOPY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(5): 162-165. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201505034
[10]	Li Jianfen, Wu Dongfeng, Wang Yan. STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF A LONG-SPAN AND ARCHED STEEL CANOPY WITHOUT COLUMN ON PLATFORM IN TAIZHOU RAILWAY STATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(11): 168-171. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz2001411033
[11]	Pan Yi, Li Lingjiao, Ma Cunming, Luo Nan. WIND TUNNEL TEST ON THE TERMINAL OF DAOCHENG YADING AIRPORT IN SICHUAN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(09): 139-144.
[12]	Lin Yongjun, Song Changjiang, Luo Nan, Li Mingshui, Gao Xiujian. STUDY ON WIND TUNNEL TEST OF LARGE-SPAN SINGLE-LAYER RETICULATED SHELL STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(7): 130-134. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201307029
[13]	Li Yijia, Wang Xiaodun, Yu Jianxing. WIND TUNNEL TEST ON AERODYNAMIC UNSTABLE VIBRATION OF INVERTED Y TOWERS OF NEW HYBRID STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(11): 106-110. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201211023
[14]	Sun Binyan, Zhang Xuwei, Chen Jiaguang. VIBRATION MODES COUPLING EFFECT IN THE WIND-INDUCED RESPONSE OF A LONG SPAN ROOF[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(8): 139-143. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201208027
[15]	Chen Hongqiu, Zhou Guixiang, Zhou Yin, Liang Jun. AERO-INTERFERENCE OF SURROUNDING HIGH RISE BUILDINGS ON LARGE-SPAN CURVED ROOF[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(6): 55-59. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201206013
[16]	Zhang Mingliang, Li Qiusheng. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON WIND LOAD CHARACTERISTICS OF ROOF STRUCTURE FOR JILIN RAILWAY STATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(4): 123-130,30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201204026
[17]	Qi Yueqin, Liu Lingling. STUDY ON WIND TUNNEL TEST OF WIND LOADS OF DRY COAL SHEDS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(7): 120-124. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201107026
[18]	Zhao Gengqi, Bai Guoliang, Li Xiaowen. WIND TUNNEL TEST FOR GUST FACTOR OF WIND-BREAK WALL OF THREE-SPAN AIR-COOLED CONDENSER STRUCTURE SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(3): 39-42. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200903013
[19]	Wang Heng, Sun Bingnan, Lou Wenjuan, Shen Guohui, . CALCULATION OF WIND-INDUCED VIBRATION FACTOR OF ROOF FOR TAIZHOU STADIUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(4): 82-84,94. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200504024
[20]	Jia Bin, Wang Ruheng, Wang Qinhua. WIND TUNNEL TEST OF WIND LOAD CHARACTERISTICS OF A MEGASTRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(8): 28-30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200408009

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

1.	张小敏，裴城，程小慷，杨雄伟，马存明. 山体高度对机场航站楼屋盖风压分布的影响. 科学技术与工程. 2025(03): 1165-1173 .
2.	李伟，庄新龙，孙宇，赵玉岐，许方辉，孙鑫晖，张营营. 下击暴流作用下济宁北站屋盖风压特性. 工业建筑. 2024(07): 120-127 . 本站查看
3.	但玥，高丽敏，余华蔚，李瑞宇，罗秋生，郝玉扬. 考虑偏峰统计特征的压气机叶栅前缘半径加工误差不确定性量化. 航空学报. 2024(19): 89-99 .
4.	李延民，黄瑞，赵树森，王景玉. 基于流固耦合的骨架膜结构优化. 沈阳工业大学学报. 2023(01): 113-120 .
5.	张涛，谷子颀，陈伏彬. 异形曲面屋盖结构脉动风压的非高斯特性及峰值因子的研究. 工业建筑. 2023(04): 94-101 . 本站查看
6.	张成，李明业，潘立志，李元. 基于独立分量相异性分析的动态过程监控研究. 应用科技. 2023(05): 17-24 .
7.	李锦华，邓羊晨，黄永虎，李春祥. 非高斯脉动风压的现场实测教学与实践. 实验室研究与探索. 2023(09): 220-223 .