Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
YANG Xinguang, LI Jiwa, XU Haixiang, LIU Kai, SONG Zhengfeng. ULTIMATE BEARING CAPABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO INTERNAL PRESSURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(12): 74-78. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21102021
Citation: SHEN Yuekui, LI Yang, LIU Chendi, WANG Jiajia. Research on Wind Pressure Distribution of Truncated Ellipsoid Air-Supported Structure Considering Fluid-Solid Interaction and Fluctuating Wind Effect[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(6): 120-126. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21060710

Research on Wind Pressure Distribution of Truncated Ellipsoid Air-Supported Structure Considering Fluid-Solid Interaction and Fluctuating Wind Effect

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21060710
  • Received Date: 2021-06-07
    Available Online: 2022-09-05
  • The characteristics of wind pressure distribution of an ellipsoidal air-supported structure considering fluid-structure interaction and fluctuating wind effect were studied. Firstly, the time-history data of fluctuating wind speed obtained in MATLAB by using linear filter method was imported into Fluent. Secondly, the wind pressure coefficients of the structures under different wind direction angles, heights and internal pressures after the wind-induced response stabilized were obtained by the partitioned weakly coupled algorithm on Workbench 17.0 platform. The results showed that the extreme values of the negative pressure coefficient increased obviously when the fluid-structure interaction was considered. The three variables had influence on the distribution, magnitude and changing rate of wind pressure. The wind pressure extreme values of the structure could be kept at a low level at 400 Pa.
  • [1]
    张其林. 膜结构在我国的应用回顾和未来发展[J]. 建筑结构, 2019, 49(19):55-64.
    [2]
    申跃奎, 赵德顺, 王秦. 考虑流固耦合作用的充气膜结构风压分布研究[J]. 计算力学学报, 2017, 34(5):665-671.
    [3]
    赵德顺. 考虑流固耦合的充气膜结构风动力特性研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2017.
    [4]
    孙国军, 吴明泽, 何艳丽,等. 加劲索网对超大跨度气承式膜结构性能影响[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2019, 52(增刊2):54-59.
    [5]
    张虎跃, 王秀丽. 流线型单脊膜结构表面风压特性数值模拟分析[J]. 工业建筑, 2021,51(7):90-97.
    [6]
    王福军. 计算流体动力学分析[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2004.
    [7]
    GLÜCK M, BREUER M, DURST F, et al. Computation of wind-induced vibrations of flexible shells and membranous structures[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2003, 17:739-765.
    [8]
    NAYER G D, APOSTOLATOS A, WOOD J N, et al. Numerical studies on the instantaneous fluid-structure interaction of an air-inflated flexible membrane in turbulent flow[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2018, 82:577-609.
    [9]
    WOOD J N, BREUER M, NAYER G D. Experimental studies on the instantaneous fluid-structure interaction of an air-inflated flexible membrane in turbulent flow[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2018, 80:405-440.
    [10]
    武岳, 沈世钊. 膜结构风振分析的数值风洞方法[J]. 空间结构, 2003, 9(2):38-43.
    [11]
    陈怡然, 周岱, 孙颖昊,等. 典型组合形体空间膜结构风振响应的数值分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2012, 46(10):1587-1593.
    [12]
    李如地, 李华峰, 周岱,等. 某典型细长索膜结构风振效应的数值模拟分析[J].空间结构, 2014, 20(3):36-41.
    [13]
    武岳, 孙瑛, 郑朝荣,等. 风工程与结构抗风设计[M]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社, 2019.
    [14]
    沈国辉, 黄俏俏, 郭勇,等. 脉动风场的模拟方法及其在输电线路风振计算中的应用[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2013, 31(1):69-74.
    [15]
    乔磊, 杨庆山. 大跨薄膜结构平均风压的数值模拟技术[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(增刊2):170-175.
    [16]
    KAWAMURA S, KIUCHI T. An experimental study of a one-membrane type pneumatic structure-wind load and response[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1986, 23:127-140.
    [17]
    SRIVASTAVA N, TURKKAN N. Experimental determination of wind pressure distribution for cylindrical and spherical flexible membrane structures[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1995, 22:23-31.
    [18]
    SUN X, YU R, WU Y. Investigation on wind tunnel experiments of ridge-valley tensile membrane structures[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 187:280-298.
    [19]
    孙晓颖, 李天娥, 张强,等. 典型张拉膜结构风压分布特性数值分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2016, 37(增刊1):1-12.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHOU Meng, ZHANG Yiyao, WU Bin. Wind-Induced Vibration Response Analysis of Overhead Transmission Lines Under Icing Condition[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 8-14. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21070113
    [2]LI Zhiguo, PENG Yuxuan, QIN Chuan, YANG Xiongwei. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON NON-GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF FLUCTUATING WIND LOADS ON A LONG-SPAN CURVED ROOF[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 84-89,106. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21012603
    [3]WU Zhaofeng. INTELLIGENT FEEDBACK ANALYSIS OF FLUID-SOLID COUPLING ON ADJOINING ROCK OF TUNNELS IN RICH WATER ZONES BASED ON THE GP-DE METHOD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(2): 140-145,205. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20031408
    [4]ZHANG Huyue, WANG Xiuli. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ANALYSIS OF WIND PRESSURE CHARACTERISTICS ON STREAMLINED MEMBRANE STRUCTURE WITH A SINGLE RIDGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 90-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20081303
    [5]YU Jinghai, ZHAO Yuyang, JIANG Zhiyu, HAN Fengqing, LI Luchuan. RESEARCH ON THE WIND-LOAD SHAPE COEFFICIENT OF THE CRESCENT-SHAPED ROOF[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 52-57. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005009
    [7]Liu Lin, Bai Guoliang, Xue Qunhu, Li Hongxing. TEST STUDY OF WIND LOAD BODY COEFFICIENT OF AIR COOLED CONDENSER ERECTED ON SUPPORT SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(06): 52-56. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201406013
    [8]Shen Yuekui, Wang Zhangping, Peng Chengbo, Wu Bo. FIRE TEMPERATURE FIELDS AND SMOKE DISTRIBUTION OF RECTANGULAR PLANE AIR-SUPPORTED MEMBRANE STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(09): 78-82.
    [9]Shu Xingping, Yan Xinghua, Zou Hao. SIMULATION OF FLUCTUATING WIND LOAD ON ANGLE-STEEL COMMUNICATION TOWER AND ANALYSIS OF WIND-INDUCED VIBRATION RESPONSES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(4): 119-123. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201104025
    [10]Han Jun, Li Yingmin, Liu Liping, LüHui. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS ON THE DAMPING EFFECT OF STRUCTURE WITH TUNED LIQUID DAMPERS SUBJECTED TO SEISMIC EXCITATIONS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(4): 55-59,74. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201004013
    [11]Liu Lin, Bai Guoliang, Kong Jiangtao, Zhao Chunlian, Li Hongxing. STUDY ON BODY COEFFICIENT AND PILE CLUSTER EFFECT OF CONCRETE PIPE COLUMNS IN SUPPORT STRUCTURE SYSTEM OF AIR COOLED CONDENSER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(3): 43-47. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200903014
    [12]Liu Lin, Bai Guoliang, Li Xiaowen, Li Hongxing, Zhao Chunlian. TEST STUDY ON WIND PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION ON WIND-BREAK WALL OF SUPPORT STRUCTURE SYSTEM OF AIR COOLED CONDENSER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 46-51. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908013
    [13]Lian Yeda, Zhang Xun’an, Qin Xiangjun, Wang Zhaoxia. EFFECT OF ADDITIVE COLUMN IN NEW BUILDING STRUCTURE SUBJECTED TO PULSATING WIND LOADS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 38(8): 39-41,45. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200808011
    [14]Zhang Min. RANDOM ANALYSIS OF PULSATING WIND VIBRATION RESPONSE OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL VIBRATION-ABSORPTION MEGAFRAME STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(6): 40-45. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200706011
    [15]Xu Wei, Song Can, Luo Yanbin, Xie Xiaosong. ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC PROPERTY OF ELEVATED PILE FOUNDATION STEEL SUSPENDING COFFERDAM IN DEEP WATER UNDER WIND LOAD[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(7): 82-84. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200707024
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 白硕,赵利军,赵娜,孟秋燕. 荷载作用下超高层建筑结构风荷载响应仿真. 计算机仿真. 2024(09): 243-246+391 .
    2. 王灿灿,郑敏,白云长,陈明亚,高红波,林磊,徐德城,周帅. 基于三维流动仿真的屋顶通风器抗台风的强度分析. 中国核电. 2023(01): 71-76 .
    3. 董明望,辜勇,乔磊,曲泓. 充气膜结构研究综述. 建筑结构. 2023(S1): 544-550 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.4 %FULLTEXT: 8.4 %META: 91.0 %META: 91.0 %PDF: 0.6 %PDF: 0.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.1 %其他: 17.1 %其他: 1.7 %其他: 1.7 %Austin: 0.9 %Austin: 0.9 %Canton: 0.3 %Canton: 0.3 %Clemmons: 0.6 %Clemmons: 0.6 %Clovis: 0.3 %Clovis: 0.3 %Grove City: 0.3 %Grove City: 0.3 %Indianapolis: 0.3 %Indianapolis: 0.3 %Monroe: 0.3 %Monroe: 0.3 %Rochester: 1.2 %Rochester: 1.2 %Valencia: 0.3 %Valencia: 0.3 %上海: 0.9 %上海: 0.9 %丹佛: 0.6 %丹佛: 0.6 %休斯敦: 0.3 %休斯敦: 0.3 %休斯顿: 0.6 %休斯顿: 0.6 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %六安: 0.3 %六安: 0.3 %北京: 1.7 %北京: 1.7 %匹兹堡: 1.2 %匹兹堡: 1.2 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %南宁: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %卡马里奥: 0.9 %卡马里奥: 0.9 %厦门: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %圣何塞: 0.6 %圣何塞: 0.6 %圣保罗: 0.6 %圣保罗: 0.6 %坦佩: 0.3 %坦佩: 0.3 %墨尔本: 0.9 %墨尔本: 0.9 %夏洛特: 1.2 %夏洛特: 1.2 %大连: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %安德森: 0.6 %安德森: 0.6 %密蘇里城: 3.8 %密蘇里城: 3.8 %巴利亚多利德: 0.6 %巴利亚多利德: 0.6 %巴吞鲁日: 0.3 %巴吞鲁日: 0.3 %布劳利: 0.3 %布劳利: 0.3 %布鲁克林区: 1.2 %布鲁克林区: 1.2 %常州: 2.0 %常州: 2.0 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %开罗: 0.3 %开罗: 0.3 %弗里霍尔德: 0.3 %弗里霍尔德: 0.3 %得克萨斯州: 0.6 %得克萨斯州: 0.6 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %拉斯维加斯: 0.6 %拉斯维加斯: 0.6 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %森尼韦尔: 0.6 %森尼韦尔: 0.6 %洛杉矶: 0.9 %洛杉矶: 0.9 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %清水: 0.6 %清水: 0.6 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %米兰: 0.6 %米兰: 0.6 %纳苏县: 0.6 %纳苏县: 0.6 %绵阳: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 16.5 %芒廷维尤: 16.5 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %西宁: 22.3 %西宁: 22.3 %西安: 2.0 %西安: 2.0 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 2.3 %运城: 2.3 %那不勒斯: 0.6 %那不勒斯: 0.6 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %都伯林: 0.6 %都伯林: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阿布奎基: 0.3 %阿布奎基: 0.3 %其他其他AustinCantonClemmonsClovisGrove CityIndianapolisMonroeRochesterValencia上海丹佛休斯敦休斯顿保定六安北京匹兹堡南京南宁南通卡马里奥厦门圣何塞圣保罗坦佩墨尔本夏洛特大连天津安德森密蘇里城巴利亚多利德巴吞鲁日布劳利布鲁克林区常州常德广州开罗弗里霍尔德得克萨斯州成都拉斯维加斯晋城朝阳森尼韦尔洛杉矶深圳清水烟台米兰纳苏县绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州西宁西安贵阳运城那不勒斯郑州都伯林重庆长沙长治阿布奎基

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (314) PDF downloads(2) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return