Shear Properties of Anisotropic Structural Surfaces with Similar Strength

CUI Zhimeng; DENG Zhiying; ZHANG Bingwu; YU Hao; LI Long

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21052304

Volume 52 Issue 6

Sep. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2022 > 52(6): 133-139

CUI Zhimeng, DENG Zhiying, ZHANG Bingwu, YU Hao, LI Long. Shear Properties of Anisotropic Structural Surfaces with Similar Strength[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(6): 133-139. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21052304

Citation:

CUI Zhimeng, DENG Zhiying, ZHANG Bingwu, YU Hao, LI Long. Shear Properties of Anisotropic Structural Surfaces with Similar Strength[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(6): 133-139. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21052304

Citation:

PDF( 15934 KB)

Shear Properties of Anisotropic Structural Surfaces with Similar Strength

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21052304

1. School of Highway, Chang' an University, Xi'an 710064, China;
2. Guangzhou Cheng' an Highway & Bridge Testing Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511431, China

Received Date: 2021-05-23
Available Online: 2022-09-05

Abstract

Abstract

To further understand the mechanical properties of anisotropic structural surfaces, the specimens with gypsum-mortar structural surfaces in four joint roughness coefficients were made based on the standard Barton’s section lines of structural surfaces. Particularly, gypsum and mortar had the similar uniaxial compressive strength. Two kinds of curves between shear stress and displacement were obtained by indoor direct shear tests under three kinds of normal stress. Consequently, the change laws for peak shear strength of specimens with gypsum-mortar structural surfaces with the increase of joint roughness coefficients and normal stress were analyzed. Based on the numerical simulating results, the shear failure modes of anisotropic structural surfaces with similar strength were summarized. The curves between shear stress and displacement of anisotropic structural surfacess with lower roughness coefficients developed to the residual deformation stage after reaching peak values, while the curves of specimens with higher roughness coefficients evolved to the obvious softening stage. The growth rates of shear stress was positively correlated with roughness coefficients and normal stress. Under different normal stress, climbing failure, climbing-gnawing failure and gnawing failure occured successively to the anisotropic structural surfaces with similar strength as the roughness coefficient increased.
- anisotropic structural surface with similar strength,
- roughness coefficient,
- shear deformation,
- peak shear strength,
- shear failure mode

FullText(HTML)

References(19)

References

[1]	贺建明, 吴刚. 岩体异性结构面的抗剪强度准则[J]. 重庆大学学报, 1994, 17(2):105-110.
[2]	刘小然, 周宏伟, 李洪. 岩石-混凝土相互作用力学行为的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(增刊2):5648-5651.
[3]	易成, 王长军, 刘晋艳, 等. 两体接触面剪切力学行为的三维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(8):2149-2156.
[4]	YANG C X, JIANG Q, LI Y H, et al. Shearing performance of natural matched joints with different wall strengths under direct shearing tests[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2018, 41(2):371-389.
[5]	WU Q, XU Y J, TANG H M, et al. Peak shear strength prediction for discontinuities between two different rock types using a neural network approach[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2019, 78(4):2315-2329.
[6]	何刘, 赵志明, 吴光, 等. 岩体结构面表面形态剪切弱化行为特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020(增刊2):1-11.
[7]	KODIKARA J K, JOHNSTON I W. Shear behaviour of irregular triangular rock-concrete joints[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1994, 31(4):313-322.
[8]	GHAZVINIAN A H, TAGHICHIAN A, HASHEMI M, et al. The shear behaviour of bedding planes of weakness between two different rock types with high strength difference[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2010, 43(1):69-87.
[9]	方堃, 吴琼, 王姣, 等. 基于颗粒流异性层面剪切特性及演化机理研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2014, 31(11):31-37.
[10]	张雅慧, 汪丁建, 唐辉明, 等. 基于PFC^2D数值试验的异性结构面剪切强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(4):1031-1041.
[11]	范祥, 邓志颖, 崔志猛, 等. 一种新的软-硬节理峰值剪切强度模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7):1861-1870.
[12]	黄胜. 高烈度地震下隧道破坏机制及抗震研究[D]. 武汉:中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所, 2010.
[13]	赵坤, 陈卫忠, 赵武胜, 等. 地下工程衬砌与减震层接触面力学特性直剪试验与数值仿真[J]. 岩土力学,2018, 39(7):2662-2670.
[14]	张茂础, 盛谦, 崔臻, 等. 围岩-衬砌接触面剪切力学性质及破坏机制的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(3):550-559.
[15]	朱瑞娟, 顾琳琳. 规则齿形结构面剪切-渗流耦合特性[J]. 工业建筑, 2020, 50(10):101-105.
[16]	冯鹏, 张汉青, 孟鑫淼, 等. 3D打印技术在工程建设中的应用及前景[J]. 工业建筑, 2019, 49(12):154-165 ,194.
[17]	BARTON N, CHOUBEY V. The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1978, 10(1/2):1-54.
[18]	曹平, 何云, 范祥, 等. 剪切前后结构面表面形貌纹理特征变化[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(11):4624-4630.
[19]	蔡美峰,何满朝,刘东燕. 岩石力学与工程[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2013.