Model Tests for Two-Tier Slopes Supported with Ridge Walls of Geotextile Bags Under Lateral Loading

GUAN Xiaodi; LI Rongjian; JIANG Zilong; QIN Zexuan; CAO Jieyu

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21050609

Volume 52 Issue 6

Sep. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2022 > 52(6): 140-149

Zhuang Jinping, Cai Xuefeng, Lin Zengzhong, Zhou Jizhong, Lin Huaqiang. SITE MEASUREMENT AND DISCUSSION ON MODIFYING METHOD OF BEARING CAPACITY FORMULA OF SUPER HIGH OR LARGE-SPAN FORM STRUT SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(9): 94-99. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201109021

Citation:

GUAN Xiaodi, LI Rongjian, JIANG Zilong, QIN Zexuan, CAO Jieyu. Model Tests for Two-Tier Slopes Supported with Ridge Walls of Geotextile Bags Under Lateral Loading[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(6): 140-149. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21050609

Citation:

PDF( 12365 KB)

Model Tests for Two-Tier Slopes Supported with Ridge Walls of Geotextile Bags Under Lateral Loading

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21050609

Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China

Received Date: 2021-05-06
Available Online: 2022-09-05

Abstract

Abstract

To explore the lateral bearing characteristics of two-tier slopes supported with ridge walls of geotextile bags, the model tests of two-tier slopes under non-uniform lateral loading were conducted in the conditions of four kinds of ridge walls supported with geotextile bags, including no support, inclined type supporting, L-shaped supporting and L-shaped supporting with notched sills, and three kinds of slope rates involving 1∶0.3, 1∶0.5 and 1∶0.75, respectively. The displacement of the slopes and earth pressure were analyzed under lateral loading. The results showed that the horizontal displacement of the second tier slopes was greater than those of the first tier slopes. Simultaneously, the earth pressure behind those walls increased with the wall height. And the earth pressure at the connections between the first and second tier slopes was the largest. Taking the non-supporting slope as reference, the horizontal displacement at the tops of the second tier slopes with inclined type, L-shaped and L-shaped supporting with notched sills decreased by 8.6%, 13.2% and 16.5%, respectively, and the earth pressure at the toes of slopes with inclined type supporting increased by 19.3%, and the earth pressure at the toes of the second tier slopes with L-shaped supporting increased by 32.6%. The earth pressure at the toes of the second tier slopes with L-shaped supporting with notched sills increased by 42.2%. Taking the slope at a slope rate of 1∶0.3 as reference, the heave height on crests of the second tier slopes at a slope rate of 1∶0.5 increased by 18.2%, the horizontal displacement of slope tops decreased by 7.1%, and the earth pressure at toes of slope increased by 7.8%. Simultaneously, the heave height on crests of the second tier slopes at a slope rate of 1∶0.75 increased by 34.8%, the horizontal displacement of slope tops decreased by 10.9%, the earth pressure at the toes of slopes increased by 23.1%. It showed that the failure of the second tier slopes preceded that of the first tier slopes. The lateral deformation resistance of the second tier slopes was maximum in support of geotextile-bag ridge walls with the L-shaped supporting with notch sills. In addition, the smaller the slope ratio was, the greater the capacity of the slope to resist lateral deformation was, the greater the capacity of the flexible ridge wall to resist lateral earth pressure was, and the larger the bearing capacity was.
- two-stage slope,
- geotextile bag,
- lateral loading,
- lateral deformation

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

[1]	BHATTACHARYYA R, SMETS T, FULLEN M A, et al. Both effectiveness of geotextiles in reducing runoff and soil loss:a synthesis[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2010, 81:184-195.
[2]	OBERHAGEMANN K, HOSSAIN M. Geotextile bag revetments for large rivers in Bangladesh[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2011, 29(4):402-414.
[3]	WETZEL M A, WIEFMANN M, KOOP J H F. The ecological potential of geotextiles in hydraulic engineering[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2011, 29:440-446.
[4]	王凤才, 张兴, 朱菊明, 等.土工布加筋土水工挡墙设计与施工[J]. 东北水利水电, 1990 (8):29-33.
[5]	梁静, 丁金华. 冲刷试验下土工织物袋物理力学性质变化规律[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2010, 27(11):67-70.
[6]	赵鹏程. 土工织物袋在膨胀土路堑滑塌边坡处治中的应用[J]. 公路与汽运, 2015 (5):100-102.
[7]	李光录, 高霞, 刘馨. PP织物袋梯田筑坎破坏形式与稳定性分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2015, 20(2):201-206.
[8]	陈曙东, 袁红雷, 江琳坤,等. 土工织物袋充填技术在珠江河口整治工程中的应用[J]. 人民珠江, 2002 (5):35-37.
[9]	窦宝松, 王力威,栗保山. 防汛抢险中土工合成材料的应用技术[J]. 水利水电技术, 2006, 37(10):70-71 ,81.
[10]	李光录, 柳诗众, 邓民兴, 等. PP织物袋梯田筑坎技术在陕南秦巴山区的应用[J]. 中国水土保持, 2011 (11):29-31.
[11]	李光录, 柳诗众, 邓民兴, 等. 陕南秦巴山区PP织物袋梯田筑坎结构和坎型研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2012 (9):44-45.
[12]	别宗霖, 袁柳. 土工编织袋路堤填筑施工技术[J]. 技术与市场, 2013, 20(10):44-45.
[13]	杨晨辉, 李光录, 杨娟,等. PP织物袋梯田护坎植物根-土复合体抗剪强度研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2014 (12):52-55.
[14]	董鑫, 霍旭挺, 李荣建, 等. 梯田坎墙土压力及墙后膨胀土降雨增湿膨胀效应评价[J]. 水利水电技术, 2019,50(7):209-215.
[15]	肖玉强, 李伟, 耿莹莹,等. 砂袋挡土墙土压力和变形特性的试验研究[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2019,17(4):176-181.

Relative Articles

[1]	SHENG Xueqing, WU Hao, DENG Yuebao. THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT REINFORCEMENT METHODS ON THE STABILITY OF FILLED SLOPE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(4): 60-65. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202004011
[5]	Zhao Min Wang Lijuan, . RESEARCH ON THE STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF REMOLDED LOESS FOR EMBANKMENT SLOPE UNDER VERTICAL LOADING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(10): 106-110. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201510020
[7]	Chen Chunmei. THE INFLUENCE OF LATERAL STIFFNESS OF IRREGULARITY STRUCTURES IN FIXED BASEMENT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(04): 167-170.
[8]	Liu Yang, Tong Lewei. CRITICAL LATERAL SLENDERNESS RATIO OF STEEL BEAMS IN PLASTIC DESIGN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(05): 132-139. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201405029
[9]	Tong Genshu. EFFICIENCY OF SAG RODS AS LATERAL SUPPORTS FOR STABILITY OF PURLINS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(12): 52-56,65. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201312008
[10]	Guo Yanlin, Liu Feng, Dou Chao, Jiang Ziqin. CALCULATION OF LOAD-BEARING CAPACITY AND DEFORMATION IN SINGLY-STEPPED SINUSOIDAL CORRUGATED WEB COLUMN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(7): 22-29. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201207003
[11]	Feng Yu, Wang Xingguo, Zhang Yumin, Su Youpo. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF REINFORCEMENT RATIO OF THE CAPABILITIES OF RC COLUMN TO RESIST LATERAL IMPACT LOADING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(11): 85-88. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201111018
[12]	Shi Ping, He Shixiu, Fan Dongkai. TEST STUDY OF REAL THREE AXLE ON CROSSRANGE UNLOADING DEFORMATION OF CLAY[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(6): 88-91,104. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200906021
[13]	Sun Yong, Zhang Zhiqiang, Cheng Wenrang, Li Aiqun. STUDY ON PUSHOVER ANALYSIS METHOD BASED ON LATERAL LOADING PATTERN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(5): 47-52,55. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200905009
[14]	Wang Chunwu, Meng Shaoping. ANALYSIS OF LATERAL RESTRAINTS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(8): 47-50. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200708013
[16]	Li Xiao-dong, Dong Yu-li, Tian Li, LüJun-li, Sun Cui-ling. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON FIRE RESISTANCE OF H-SECTION STEEL COLUMN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(7): 75-78. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200607020
[17]	Zhang Ruiyun, Cao Shuangyin. ANALYSIS OF LATERAL RESTRICTION ON BEAM'S CARRYING CAPACITY OF FRAME STRUCTURE STRENGTHENED WITH EXTERNAL PRESTRESS TENDON[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(4): 35-37,17. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200504011
[18]	Wang Zhiliang, Li Yongchi, Zheng Mingxin, Yin Zongze, Wu Kehai. EXPLORATION OF e-lgp METHOD TAKING ACCOUNT OF RHEOLOGY AND LATERAL DEFORMATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(10): 36-39. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200410011