RESEARCH PROGRESS OF ECOLOGICAL RISK CONTROL METHODS AND RESPONSIVE PATHWAYS OF SPATIAL PLANNING IN MINING CITIES

LI Sui; WU Shangyu; ZHOU Shiwen; ZHOU Xueke

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21020308

Volume 51 Issue 8

Nov. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2021 > 51(8): 190-198,44

LI Sui, WU Shangyu, ZHOU Shiwen, ZHOU Xueke. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF ECOLOGICAL RISK CONTROL METHODS AND RESPONSIVE PATHWAYS OF SPATIAL PLANNING IN MINING CITIES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(8): 190-198,44. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21020308

Citation:

LI Sui, WU Shangyu, ZHOU Shiwen, ZHOU Xueke. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF ECOLOGICAL RISK CONTROL METHODS AND RESPONSIVE PATHWAYS OF SPATIAL PLANNING IN MINING CITIES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(8): 190-198,44. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21020308

Citation:

PDF( 13260 KB)

RESEARCH PROGRESS OF ECOLOGICAL RISK CONTROL METHODS AND RESPONSIVE PATHWAYS OF SPATIAL PLANNING IN MINING CITIES

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21020308

1. Institute Of Ecological Planning and Green Building, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration of Polluted Environment, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China;
3. School of Architecture and Planning, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China

Received Date: 2021-02-03
Available Online: 2021-11-10
Publish Date: 2021-11-10

Abstract

Abstract

At present, the ecological risk of mining cities in China is highly complex and severe. Building a perfect land spatial planning and governance system can provide specific implementation ways for the ecological risk regulation of mining cities, and the two are endogenous related. This paper comprehensively combs the relevant research on ecological risk regulation of mining cities, and uses CiteSpace software for literature visual analysis. The research results show that the research objects and elements of ecological risk of mining cities have evolved from single to multiple, and the risk regulation and management methods also show a systematic and diverse trend, The disciplines and theories involved have changed from independent dispersion to pluralistic integration; The preparation of land spatial planning can provide regulatory guarantee and control basis for the implementation of risk regulation in mining cities, but there is no systematic planning method from risk mechanism analysis, risk quantitative evaluation to risk process intervention. From the perspective of landscape ecology of the interaction between landscape pattern and ecological process, under the idea of interdisciplinary technical support and multi-objective optimization, this paper puts forward the spatial planning response technical framework of ecological risk regulation of mining cities, which provides innovative ideas for solving the problems of ecological risk regulation and ecological restoration of mining cities.
- mining city,
- risk factors,
- ecological process,
- spatial plannin,
- ecological restoration

FullText(HTML)

References(50)

References

[1]	毕献武,董少花. 我国矿产资源高效清洁利用进展与展望[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报,2014,33(1):14-22.
[2]	黄冉冉,陈勇,唐荣彬,等. 基于DPSIR的矿业城市生态安全多层次模糊综合云评价[J]. 工业安全与环保,2018,44(3):50-55.
[3]	孙琦. 煤矿区生态风险演化过程及防控机制研究[D]. 徐州:中国地质大学,2017.
[4]	安佑志. 基于GIS的城市生态风险评价[D]. 上海:上海师范大学,2011.
[5]	王如松. 转型期城市生态学前沿研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2000,20(5):830-840.
[6]	陈卫平,康鹏,王美娥,等. 城市生态风险管理关键问题与研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(14):5224-5233.
[7]	吴健生,罗宇航,王小玉,等.城市滑坡灾害生态风险不确定性分析及风险管理:以深圳市为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(11):3612-3621.
[8]	李国旗,安树青,陈兴龙,等. 生态风险研究述评[J]. 生态学杂志,1999,19(4):57-64.
[9]	肖文涛,王鹭. 韧性城市:现代城市安全发展的战略选择[J]. 东南学术,2019(2):89-99,246.
[10]	FU Z Y, XU X C. Regional Ecological Risk Asessment[J]. Advanee in Earth Sciences,2001,16(2):267-271.
[11]	KNAPP S, WINTER M, KLOTZ S. Increasing Species Richness but Decreasing Phylog-Enetic Richness and Divergence over a 320-Year Period of Urbanization[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017(54):1152-1160.
[12]	孙艳丽,韩昊男,董文天,等. 国外雾霾治理方式借鉴及我国城市雾霾治理研究:以沈阳市为例[J]. 辽宁经济,2017(2):55-57.
[13]	DOBBS C, NITSCHKE C, KENDAL D. Assessing the Drivers Shaping Global Patterns of Urban Vegetation Landscape Structure[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2017, 59(2):171-177.
[14]	MARTELLOZZE F, RAAMANKUTTY N, HALL R J,et al. Ubanization and the Loss of Prime Farmland:A Case Study in the Calgary-Edmonton Conidor of Alberta[J]. Regional Environmental Change,2015,15(5):881-893.
[15]	SKRBIE B D. MARINKOVIE l. PETROVID G A. Sensonal Variation and Health Risk Assessment of Organochlorine Compounds in Urban Soils of Novi Sad, Sebin[J]. Chemosphere,2017,181:101-110.
[16]	O'RIORDAN T, RAYNER S. Risk Management for Global Environmental Change[J]. Pergamon,1991,1(2):23-94.
[17]	张小飞,王如松,李正国,等. 城市综合生态风险评价:以淮北市城区为例[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(20):6204-6214.
[18]	孙琦,白中科,曹银贵. 基于生态风险评价的采煤矿区土地损毁与复垦过程分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2017,25(6):795-804.
[19]	王云才,黄俊达. 适应城市发展需求与风险的土地适宜性评价:以太原市"城六区"为例[J]. 上海城市规划,2020(1):1-7.
[20]	常青,邱瑶,谢苗苗,等. 基于土地破坏的矿区生态风险评价:理论与方法[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(16):5164-5174.
[21]	吴超,李晓艳. 有色金属矿区典型尘源污染机制与研究策略[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2015,35(6):695-720.
[22]	姜彬慧,张博,王雪峰,等. 抚顺西露天矿区土壤重金属污染及潜在风险评价[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版),2020,41(4):568-574.
[23]	薛文博,王金南,杨金田,等. 淄博市大气污染特征模型模拟及环境容量估算[J]. 环境科学,2013,34(4):1264-1269.
[24]	夏楠. 准东矿区生态环境遥感监测及生态质量评价模型研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2018.
[25]	JU-NGAM B. 基于气流模拟的深凹露天矿通风与降尘技术研究[D]. 昆明:昆明理工大学,2019.
[26]	黄清华,张万昌. SWAT模型参数敏感性分析及应用[J]. 干旱区地理,2010,33(1):8-15.
[27]	王喆,余江宽,路云阁. 西部典型煤矿区水体污染遥感监测应用[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(4):538-544.
[28]	白杰,徐世光,黄建国,等. 基于GMS软件对某矿区松散层孔隙水污染的数值模拟研究[J]. 地质灾害与环境护,2020,31(1):97-103.
[29]	GUAN Q, ZHAO R, WANG F, et al. Prediction of Heavy Metals in Soils of an Arid Area Based on Multi-Spectral Data[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2019,243:21-39.
[30]	熊秋林,肖红伟,程朋根,等. 北京表层土壤重金属污染分布及大气沉降贡献[J]. 生态环境学报,2021,30(4):816-824.
[31]	彭建,郭小楠,胡熠娜,等. 基于地质灾害敏感性的山地生态安全格局构建:以云南省玉溪市为例[J]. 应用生态学报,2017,28(2):627-635.
[32]	司雨田,方瑾,许立言. 基于生态安全格局理论的中国生态基础设施规划实践综述(1997-2019年)[J]. 景观设计学(中英文),2021,9(3):28-47.
[33]	FORMAN R T. Some General Principals of Landscape and Regional Ecology[J]. Landscape Ecology,1995,10(3):133-142.
[34]	MCHAR G. The Ecology of the City[J]. Journal of Architectural Education,1962,17(2):120-157.
[35]	俞孔坚. 生物保护的景观生态安全格局[J]. 生态学报,1999(1):10-17.
[36]	李保杰. 矿区土地景观格局演变及其生态效应研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2014.
[37]	石铁矛,李绥. 基于空间信息技术的城镇化生态风险预警研究:以南充市为例[J].城市规划,2012,36(2):51-57.
[38]	唐荣彬,付梅臣,陈勇. 控制采矿干扰扩散的生态关键地段识别研究:以大冶市为例[J]. 金属矿山,2018(3):161-167.
[39]	陈裕婵,张正栋,万露文,等. 五华河流域非点源污染风险区和风险路径识别[J]. 地理学报,2018,73(9):1765-1777.
[40]	李恒凯,刘玉婷,李芹,等. 基于MCR模型的南方稀土矿区生态安全格局分析[J]. 地理科学,2020,40(6):989-998.
[41]	邢春晖,王云才. 基于生态风险评价的城市生态格局修复:以太原市城六区为例[J]. 西部人居环境学刊,2018,33(6):48-53.
[42]	王如松. 绿韵红脉的交响曲:城市共轭生态规划方法探讨[J].城市规划学刊,2008(1):8-17.
[43]	袁奇峰,谭诗敏,李刚,等. 空间规划:为何?何为?何去?[J]. 规划师,2018,34(7):11-17 ,25.
[44]	LONGLEY P A, HARRIS R J. Towards a New Digital Data Infrastructure for Urban Analysis and Modelling[J]. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,1999,26(6):43-55.
[45]	TAYLOR R G, VASU M L, CAUSBY J F. Integrated Planning for School and Community:The Case of Johnston County,North Carolina[J]. Interfaces, 1999,29:67-89.
[46]	WANG H J, ZHU F. Site Selection Model of Land Consolidation Projects Based on Multi-Objective Optimization PSO[J]. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015,31(14):255-263.
[47]	ARIANA E, SUTTON G, KATERYNA W,et al. Future of Our Coasts:The Potential for Natural and Hybrid Infrastructure to Enhance the Resilience of Our Coastal Communities, Economies and Ecosystems[J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2015,51:23-34.
[48]	朱文英,蔡博峰,刘晓曼. 基于区域大气复合污染动态调控与多目标优化决策技术研究[J]. 中国环境管理,2016,8(6):111-112.
[49]	陶涛,肖涛,王林森,等. 海绵城市低影响开发设施多目标优化设计[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(1):92-96.
[50]	周媛,石铁矛,胡远满,等. 基于GIS与多目标区位配置模型的沈阳市公园选址[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(12):3307-3314.