RESEARCH ON EFFECT OF INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION ON PHYSICAL AUTHENTICITY IN INDUSTRIAL RELIC RENOVATION

CHU Tong; ZHAO Yuxing; SUN Miao

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG21011801

Volume 51 Issue 9

Jan. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2021 > 51(9): 75-81

CHU Tong, ZHAO Yuxing, SUN Miao. RESEARCH ON EFFECT OF INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION ON PHYSICAL AUTHENTICITY IN INDUSTRIAL RELIC RENOVATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 75-81. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21011801

Citation:

CHU Tong, ZHAO Yuxing, SUN Miao. RESEARCH ON EFFECT OF INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION ON PHYSICAL AUTHENTICITY IN INDUSTRIAL RELIC RENOVATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 75-81. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21011801

Citation:

PDF( 6468 KB)

RESEARCH ON EFFECT OF INDUSTRIAL EVOLUTION ON PHYSICAL AUTHENTICITY IN INDUSTRIAL RELIC RENOVATION

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21011801

CHU Tong¹,
ZHAO Yuxing¹,
SUN Miao^{1,2,3
,
,}

1. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Ecology and Energy-Saving Study of Dense Habitat(Tongji University), Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200092, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Shanghai Urban Renewal and Space Optimization Technology, Shanghai 200092, China

Received Date: 2021-01-18
Available Online: 2022-01-11

Abstract

Abstract

The renovation of industrial relics is the mirror of industrial evolution in physical spaces. The paper divided the renovation of industrial relics in Shanghai into four stages according to the industrial evolution since the reform and opening-up. An evaluation framework on physical authenticity was constructed based on four factors of "Building, Place, Landscape and Other Industrial Elements", so as to analyze the representative cases in different stages, to verify the influence of the urban macro industrial structure as well as the micro industrial functions of research objects on the physical authenticity in the renovation of industrial relics in industrial evolution, and pointed out that physical authenticity revealed the real demand of urban economic development generated by industries, which findings could provide reference to renovation of industrial relics in the coming industrial evolution in Shanghai.
- industrial relic renovation,
- physical authenticity,
- industrial evolution,
- central Shanghai

FullText(HTML)

References(32)

References

[1]	曹永康,竺迪. 近十年上海市工业遗产保护情况初探[J]. 工业建筑, 2019, 49(7):16-23.
[2]	徐苏斌,青木信夫. 关于工业遗产经济价值的思考[J]. 城市建筑, 2017(22):14-17.
[3]	WANG J. ‘Art in Capital’:Shaping Distinctiveness in a Culture-Led Urban Regeneration Project in Red Town, Shanghai[J]. Cities, 2009,26(6):318-330.
[4]	孙淼,李振宇.基于城市群视角的工业遗存更新模式研究:以美国东北部城市群为例[J]. 国际城市规划,2021,36(2):91-99.
[5]	卢永毅. 历史保护与原真性的困惑[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2006(5):24-29.
[6]	阮仪三,林林. 文化遗产保护的原真性原则[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2003(2):1-5.
[7]	ICOMOS. The Nara Document on Authenticity[EB/OL]. ICOMOS. 1994, 2020-11-29. https://www.icomos.org/charters/nara-e.pdf.
[8]	GRAHAM B, HOWARD P. Introduction:Heritage and Identity[M]. Farnham:Ashgate, 2008:4.
[9]	WANG N. Rethinking Authenticity in Tourism Experience[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 1999,26(2):349-370.
[10]	WESENER A. Adopting ‘Things of the Little’:Intangible Cultural Heritage and Experiential Authenticity of Place in the Jewellery Quarter, Birmingham[J]. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2017,23(2):141-155.
[11]	OEVERMANN H, DEGENKOLB J, DIEBLER A, et al. Participation in the Reuse of Industrial Heritage Sites:the Case of Oberschöneweide, Berlin[J]. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2016,22(1):43-58.
[12]	The International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage. The Nizhny Tagil Chapter[S]. Nuzhny Tagil:TICCIH, 2003.
[13]	The International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage. Dublin Principles[S]. Dublin:TICCIH, 2011.
[14]	仲丹丹,徐苏斌.谈工业遗产研究与产业经济关联研究的必要性[C]//2015年中国第6届工业建筑遗产学术研讨会论文集. 2015:576-581.
[15]	谢涤湘,陈惠琪,邓雅雯. 工业遗产再利用背景下的文化创意产业园规划研究[J]. 工业建筑,2013,43(3):36-39 ,107.
[16]	万谦. 探寻武汉工业遗产的产业链价值[J]. 新建筑,2012(2):34-37.
[17]	黄琪. 上海近代工业建筑保护和再利用[D]. 上海:同济大学, 2008.
[18]	王灿. 1970s-2015年长春市城市扩张过程时空动态分析[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨师范大学, 2017.
[19]	仲丹丹. 我国工业遗产保护再利用与文化产业结合发展之动因研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2016.
[20]	郑时龄. 关于上海城市更新的思考[J]. 建筑实践,2019(7):8-11.
[21]	丁凡,伍江. 上海城市更新演变及新时期的文化转向[J]. 住宅科技,2018,38(11):1-9.
[22]	苏甦.上海城市更新的发展历程研究[C]//2017中国城市规划年会论文集. 东莞:2017.
[23]	陈鹏,胡莉莉. 上海工业遗产保护利用对策研究[J]. 上海城市规划, 2013(1):16-22.
[24]	孙淼,李振宇. 从Loft到社区:上海中心城区"城中厂"居住化更新的特征研究[J]. 建筑遗产,2017(1):69-77.
[25]	张鹏,吴霄婧. 转型制度演进与工业建筑遗产保护与再生分析:以上海为例[J]. 城市规划, 2016,40(9):75-83.
[26]	孙淼,陈晨. 工业遗产改造作为城市更新触媒的深层机制研究:基于上海市宜山路街区和场园街区的案例比较[J]. 城市建筑, 2019, 16(19):12-20 ,152.
[27]	代锋. 历史文化记忆的再生:登琨艳对"老建筑"保护性设计的思想研究[J]. 设计艺术研究,2018,8(4):23-26 ,89.
[28]	诸大建,王红兵. 构建创意城市:21世纪上海城市发展的核心价值[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2007(3):20-24.
[29]	孙淼. 全球城市背景下都市工业遗产转型社区的适应性策略研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2018, 48(7):44-48 , 114.
[30]	倪鹏飞. 2012年城市竞争力蓝皮书[R]. 北京:中国社会科学院财经战略研究院.2012.
[31]	章明,张姿,张洁,等. 涤岸之兴:上海杨浦滨江南段滨水公共空间的复兴[J]. 建筑学报,2019(8):16-26.
[32]	宿新宝. 城市历史空间的有机更新上生·新所的实践[J]. 时代建筑,2018(6):121-125.