Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Included in the Hierarchical Directory of High-quality Technical Journals in Architecture Science Field
Volume 51 Issue 9
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LUO Yuqi, GU Qian, ZHAO Duanfeng, TIAN Shui, TAN Yuan. RESEARCH ON ASEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF T-SHAPED DOUBLE-SIDED COMPOSITED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS WITH CONSTRUCTIONAL EDGE MEMBERS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 90-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21010604
Citation: LUO Yuqi, GU Qian, ZHAO Duanfeng, TIAN Shui, TAN Yuan. RESEARCH ON ASEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF T-SHAPED DOUBLE-SIDED COMPOSITED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS WITH CONSTRUCTIONAL EDGE MEMBERS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(9): 90-97. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21010604

RESEARCH ON ASEISMIC PERFORMANCES OF T-SHAPED DOUBLE-SIDED COMPOSITED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS WITH CONSTRUCTIONAL EDGE MEMBERS

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21010604
  • Received Date: 2021-01-06
    Available Online: 2022-01-11
  • In order to study the aseismic performance of T-shaped assembled monolithic double-sided composite shear walls with constructional edge members, two full-scale T-shape shear wall specimens were tested. The test results showed that both the composite and cast-in-situ specimens displayed typical bending-shear failure characteristics in the axial compression ratio of 0.2. Compared with cast-in-situ specimens, the ultimate bearing capacity of flanges for composite specimens in the state of tension and compression was reduced by 15.7% and 3.0%; the ductility coefficient of flanges in the state of tension was the same as that of cast-in-situ specimens, while the ductility coefficient of flanges in the state of compression was lower than that of cast-in-situ specimens; the stiffness degradation laws of the two were basically the same. The cumulative energy consumption of composite specimens was significantly lower than that of cast-in-place specimens. The horizontal connection of webs, flanges and T-shaped constructional edges of composite specimens worked well as a whole. According to the test results, it was suggested to improve the stirrup ratio in constructional edge members of the composite specimens.
  • loading
  • [1]
    连星,叶献国,蒋庆,等.一种新型绿色住宅体系:叠合板式剪力墙体系[J].工业建筑,2010,40(6):79-84

    ,92.
    [2]
    胡轶炜,胡志鹏,王世昕,等.我国叠合板式剪力墙结构研究现状[J]. 四川建材,2016,42(10):24-26.
    [3]
    ALBERTO P, DIONYSIOS A B. Experimental Assessment of the Seismic Performance of a Prefabricated Concrete Structural Wall System[J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(6):2049-2062.
    [4]
    任军,叶献国.不同轴压比下叠合板式剪力墙的抗震性能研究[J]. 结构工程师,2010,26(5):66-72.
    [5]
    肖全东,郭正兴.预制混凝土双板剪力墙抗震性能试验[J]. 土木工程学报,2014,47(增刊2):151-157.
    [6]
    薛伟辰,李亚,蔡磊,等.双面叠合混凝土剪力墙平面内和平面外抗震性能研究[J]. 工程力学,2018,35(5):47-54.
    [7]
    ALPER A, BARIS B, ERDEM C. Cyclic Testing of Reinforced Concrete Double Walls[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2017, 114(2):395-406.
    [8]
    王滋军,李向民,王宇.带有约束边缘构件的预制叠合剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J].中南大学学报,2016,47(8):2759-2767.
    [9]
    黄潇.T形叠合式剪力墙板抗震性能的非线性有限元分析[D].合肥:安徽建筑工业学院,2011.
    [10]
    黄潇,沈小璞,庞培培.不同轴压比下T形叠合式剪力墙的抗震性能的非线性分析[J].安徽建筑工业学院学报,2011,19(4):9-14.
    [11]
    张伟林,沈小璞,吴志新,等.叠合板式剪力墙T型、L型墙体抗震性能试验研究[J].工程力学,2012,29(6):196-201.
    [12]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 装配式混凝土建筑技术标准:GB/T 51231-2016[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2017.
    [13]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程:JGJ 3-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
    [14]
    史庆轩,王斌,何伟锋,等.带翼缘钢筋混凝土剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2017,38(1):106-115.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (101) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return