THE WIND TUNNEL TEST OF THE AEROELASTIC MODEL OF A STADIUM

HUANG Peng; LIN Huatan; GU Ming

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG201906280004

Volume 50 Issue 12

Mar. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2020 > 50(12): 64-68

LIANG Yan, WEI Yingying, FENG Haoqi, ZHAO Ming, GUO Jing. Simulation Analysis on Construction Processes of Long-Span and Complex Steel Frames with Inclined Pillars[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(2): 75-80. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201902180009

Citation:

HUANG Peng, LIN Huatan, GU Ming. THE WIND TUNNEL TEST OF THE AEROELASTIC MODEL OF A STADIUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 64-68. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201906280004

Citation:

HUANG Peng, LIN Huatan, GU Ming. THE WIND TUNNEL TEST OF THE AEROELASTIC MODEL OF A STADIUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 64-68. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201906280004

PDF( 2131 KB)

THE WIND TUNNEL TEST OF THE AEROELASTIC MODEL OF A STADIUM

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201906280004

State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received Date: 2020-05-20
Available Online: 2021-03-31

Abstract

Abstract

The long-span stadium is a wind-sensitive structure. Due to the difficulty in designing and manufacturing the aeroelastic model, there is still little wind tunnel test of such structure. In this paper, an aeroelastic model of a long-span stadium was manufactured and tested in wind tunnel. The effects of wind speed and wind direction on the displacement response were analyzed. In addition, wind pressure of the aeroelastic model were also measured to make a comparison with that of rigid model. The results showed that the maximum displacement of the roof structure occured at the position perpendicular to the wind direction. The displacement response increased with wind speed, the higher the wind speed, the higher the growth rate. It was also found that there was little difference in mean wind pressures between aeroelastic model and rigid model, while the fluctuating wind pressures of aeroelastic model were larger than that of rigid model.
- aeroelastic model,
- long-span stadium,
- wind-induced response,
- wind tunnel test,
- wind direction,
- wind speed

FullText(HTML)

References(10)

References

李寿科, 李寿英, 陈政清,等. 大跨开合式屋盖峰值风压的试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2010, 29(11):66-72.

李秋胜, 梁晓娟, 陈伏彬,等. "天使之翼"体育场风压特性试验[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2017, 34(5):92-100.

黄鹏, 顾明. 一大跨度悬挑雨篷的风荷载及开洞比较[J]. 结构工程师, 2004, 20(4):51-55.

金海, 金新阳, 陈岱林. 国家游泳中心及大跨度平面屋顶的风荷载CFD初步分析[C]//全国结构风工程实验技术研讨会论文集. 2004.

孙晓颖, 林斌, 吴晓蓉,等. CFD技术在大跨屋盖结构风荷载确定中的应用[C]//空间结构学术会议论文集. 2005.

洪财滨. 典型形式大跨度屋盖风致雪漂移的数值模拟研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2012.

NAKAMURA O, TAMURA Y, MIYASHITA K, et al. A Case Study of Wind Pressure and Wind-Induced Vibration of a Large Span Open-Type Roof[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 1994, 52(94):237-248.

KAWAI H, YOSHIE R, WEI R, et al. Wind-Induced Response of a Large Cantilevered Roof[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999, 83(1/2/3):263-275.

顾明, 黄翔. 体育场屋盖气弹模型设计及风洞试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2005, 26(1):60-64.

顾明, 朱川海. 体育场主看台弧形挑篷气弹模型风洞试验和响应特性[J]. 土木工程学报, 2006, 39(10):54-59.

Relative Articles

[1]	LIU Weiran, GUO Shida, FANG Bin, YU Haifeng, WANG Jiawei, GAO Renqing, YE Xihao, HAN Jiantian. Research on the Mechanical Properties of Steel Truss Support Platform During the Construction of the Roof of a Large-Scale Silo[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 55(2): 263-270. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG22031614
[2]	HUANG Puxi, LUO Dan, ZHANG Bo, ZHU Yamin, SHEN Yang. Parametrically Simulative Analysis on Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction Potential of Movably Anhydrously Ecological Restrooms[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 83-93. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22080509
[3]	AN Daoyao. Safety Limit Analysis for the Whole Construction Process of a Super High-Rise Building Under Strong Earthquakes[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(3): 117-122. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21062921
[4]	ZHOU Yan-ling, CAO Da-fu, WANG Kun, GE Wen-jie, LIU Jia-qi. Analysis of Creep Effect of Prestressed Concrete Continuous Beam Bridge in Construction Process[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(9): 101-107. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzg21060914
[5]	GAO Peng, GE Changwen, LIU Maofang, MENG Lei, YIN Zongcheng, WANG Zhiqiang, GAN Zhengyong, YANG Xuan, ZHU Jie. Numerical Analysis of Crack Resistance of Concrete Structure of Ultra-Long Round Stadium During Construction[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(10): 94-99,110. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22073006
[6]	LIANG Yan, LU Aoqi, GUAN Pinwu, WANG Yan, ZHANG Hao. ANALYSIS OF THE CONSTRUCTION INFLUENCE OF INCLINED COLUMN SUPPORT SYSTEM IN ANCIENT SITE PROTECTION BUILDING[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 98-101,75. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201902180009
[7]	Huo Runke, Li Maoda, Li Jing, Wang Qiang, Yan Jirui. NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION PROCESS OF UNSYMMETRICAL TUNNEL IN SOFT ROCK[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 45(2): 95-100. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201502021
[8]	Chen Xu. STUDY ON FIELD MEASUREMENT OF HIGH-FORMWORK WITH A HEIGHT OF 15 m[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(8): 106-108. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201308023
[9]	Wei Gang, Chen Chunlai. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE EFFECT OF DOUBLE-O-TUBE SHIELD TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION ON ADJACENT MASONRY BUILDINGS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(1): 117-122,127. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201201022
[10]	Xiong Xueyu, Cheng Chen, Li Yuan, LüPin. STUDY ON THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRAME TAKING ACCOUNT OF THE IMPACT OF THE SECONDARY INTERNAL FORCE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(12): 12-15. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201112003
[11]	Zhang Zhong, Li Xiaojiang, Zhang Xinbin, Cheng Daye. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND STUDY ON CURING METHODS AND TECHNICAL INDEXES OF MASS-CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(1): 5-7,23. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201001002
[12]	Wang Bin, Wang Jieyuan, Yang Dongjun Xu Dexin, Duan Chengxiao. STUDY ON THE TIME-DEPENDENT RELIABILITY INDEX OF CONSOLIDATED REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(10): 1-5. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201010001
[13]	Zhang Zhong, Zhang Tao. APPLICATION OF FE METHOD IN TEMPERATURE CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION OF MASS CONCRETE RAFT FOUNDATIONS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(1): 21-23. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201001007
[14]	Zheng Jiang, Hao Jiping, Li Cunliang, Yang Xiaoli, Wang Xiantie, Liu Shaowen. MECHANICS EMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE HESHI STUPA OF FAMEN TEMPLE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(10): 90-95. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200910022
[15]	Zhang Zhong, Zhang Xinbin. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF TEMPERATURE STRESS OF CPR1000 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT RAFT WITH DIFFERENT POUR THICKNESS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(10): 102-104,147. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200910024
[16]	Liu Xuewu, Guo Yanlin, Zhang Qinglin, Liu Luyu. ANALYSIS OF INTERNAL FORCE AND DEFORMATION FOR THE NEW CCTV HEADQUARTERS DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(9): 22-29. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200709004
[17]	Liu An-jun, Gong Xiao-nan, Qian Guo-zhen. A NONLINEAR ANALYSIS OF COMBINED ACTIONS OF SOIL ANCHORS AND EARTH-RETAINING PILE WALL IN CONSIDERATION OF CONSTRUCTION STEPS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(5): 74-78. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200605020
[18]	Mao Jinping, Xu Wei. RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF ROCK- SOCKETED SUPPORT STRUCTURES WITH REAL- TIME DEFORMATION CONTROL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 36(2): 42-44. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200602013
[19]	Wang Wei, Chen Xiaobao. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF CAST IN PLACE HOLLOW IRREGULAR FLOOR OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2005, 35(2): 47-49,63. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200502013
[20]	Guo Yanlin, Cui Xiaoqiang. KEY TECHNICAL PROBLEMS AND DISCUSSION IN CONSTRUCTION PROCESS OF LARGE SPAN STEEL STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(12): 1-5,22. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200412001

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	张京龙. 斜柱板式基础工程测量方法及在房地产测量中运用研究. 科技资讯. 2023(15): 105-108 .
2.	王金荣，王秀丽，苟宝龙，王雁欣. 大型复杂体育馆钢结构吊装过程温度影响分析与现场监测研究. 工业建筑. 2023(08): 96-101+57 . 本站查看
3.	陈颖，丁东山，卢皓，叶福相. EPC模式下大跨钢桁架施工模拟分析融合结构设计. 工业建筑. 2023(S2): 798-800 . 本站查看