THE WIND TUNNEL TEST OF THE AEROELASTIC MODEL OF A STADIUM

HUANG Peng; LIN Huatan; GU Ming

doi:10.13204/j.gyjzG201906280004

Volume 50 Issue 12

Mar. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION > 2020 > 50(12): 64-68

HUANG Peng, LIN Huatan, GU Ming. THE WIND TUNNEL TEST OF THE AEROELASTIC MODEL OF A STADIUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 64-68. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201906280004

Citation:

HUANG Peng, LIN Huatan, GU Ming. THE WIND TUNNEL TEST OF THE AEROELASTIC MODEL OF A STADIUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 64-68. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201906280004

HUANG Peng, LIN Huatan, GU Ming. THE WIND TUNNEL TEST OF THE AEROELASTIC MODEL OF A STADIUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 64-68. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201906280004

Citation:

HUANG Peng, LIN Huatan, GU Ming. THE WIND TUNNEL TEST OF THE AEROELASTIC MODEL OF A STADIUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(12): 64-68. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201906280004

PDF( 2131 KB)

THE WIND TUNNEL TEST OF THE AEROELASTIC MODEL OF A STADIUM

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG201906280004

State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received Date: 2020-05-20
Available Online: 2021-03-31

Abstract

Abstract

The long-span stadium is a wind-sensitive structure. Due to the difficulty in designing and manufacturing the aeroelastic model, there is still little wind tunnel test of such structure. In this paper, an aeroelastic model of a long-span stadium was manufactured and tested in wind tunnel. The effects of wind speed and wind direction on the displacement response were analyzed. In addition, wind pressure of the aeroelastic model were also measured to make a comparison with that of rigid model. The results showed that the maximum displacement of the roof structure occured at the position perpendicular to the wind direction. The displacement response increased with wind speed, the higher the wind speed, the higher the growth rate. It was also found that there was little difference in mean wind pressures between aeroelastic model and rigid model, while the fluctuating wind pressures of aeroelastic model were larger than that of rigid model.
- aeroelastic model,
- long-span stadium,
- wind-induced response,
- wind tunnel test,
- wind direction,
- wind speed

FullText(HTML)

References(10)

References

李寿科, 李寿英, 陈政清,等. 大跨开合式屋盖峰值风压的试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2010, 29(11):66-72.

李秋胜, 梁晓娟, 陈伏彬,等. "天使之翼"体育场风压特性试验[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2017, 34(5):92-100.

黄鹏, 顾明. 一大跨度悬挑雨篷的风荷载及开洞比较[J]. 结构工程师, 2004, 20(4):51-55.

金海, 金新阳, 陈岱林. 国家游泳中心及大跨度平面屋顶的风荷载CFD初步分析[C]//全国结构风工程实验技术研讨会论文集. 2004.

孙晓颖, 林斌, 吴晓蓉,等. CFD技术在大跨屋盖结构风荷载确定中的应用[C]//空间结构学术会议论文集. 2005.

洪财滨. 典型形式大跨度屋盖风致雪漂移的数值模拟研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2012.

NAKAMURA O, TAMURA Y, MIYASHITA K, et al. A Case Study of Wind Pressure and Wind-Induced Vibration of a Large Span Open-Type Roof[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 1994, 52(94):237-248.

KAWAI H, YOSHIE R, WEI R, et al. Wind-Induced Response of a Large Cantilevered Roof[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999, 83(1/2/3):263-275.

顾明, 黄翔. 体育场屋盖气弹模型设计及风洞试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2005, 26(1):60-64.

顾明, 朱川海. 体育场主看台弧形挑篷气弹模型风洞试验和响应特性[J]. 土木工程学报, 2006, 39(10):54-59.

Relative Articles

[1]	XIA Shunjun, ZHAO Jun, MA Long, ZHANG Renqiang, DAI Ruzhang, LI Ximin. Wind Tunnel Test Study on Crane Structure with Double-Flat-Arm Derrick for Long-Span Transmission Towers[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(4): 1-7,74. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21100918
[2]	XING Guolei, LI Shouying, WU Yingqiang, LIU Min, WANG Yongfeng. Research on Wind-Induced Responses of a Solar Tower in CSP Station Based on Aeroelastic Model Test[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(6): 148-152,160. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21101208
[3]	LIU Xianggang, CHEN Jianfeng, YANG Yue, ZHAO Xuebing, ZHENG Liangping, LAI Wuqing. Design and Analysis of Long-Span Multi-Curved Arched Structures with Inclined Columns in Complex Mountainous Areas[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(12): 216-223. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22011204
[4]	LUO Kerong, YU Liang, SHU Ganping, LI Buhui, NING Shuaipeng. Analysis of Wind-Induced Response of a 500 kV Long-Span Transmission Tower-Line System Crossing the Yangtze River[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(8): 1-8. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21121615
[5]	LI Zhiguo, PENG Yuxuan, QIN Chuan, YANG Xiongwei. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON NON-GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF FLUCTUATING WIND LOADS ON A LONG-SPAN CURVED ROOF[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 84-89,106. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG21012603
[6]	HAN Miao, LI Shuangchi, DU Hongkai, LI Wanjun, HAN Rong. ANALYSIS ON WIND VIBRATION RESPONSE AND DAMPING VIBRATION REDUCTION OF LONG-SPAN GRID STRUCTURES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(5): 114-120. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202005019
[7]	LIU Shi, YANG Yi, HUANG Zheng, GAO Qingshui, ZHANG Chu, LI Zhengliang, WANG Zhisong. STUDY ON COLLAPSE STATES OF TRANSMISSION TOWERS BY WIND-TUNNEL TESTS OF TOWER-LINE SYSTEMS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(10): 145-151. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzGYJZ201907150004
[8]	Li Jianfen, Wu Dongfeng, Wang Yan. STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF A LONG-SPAN AND ARCHED STEEL CANOPY WITHOUT COLUMN ON PLATFORM IN TAIZHOU RAILWAY STATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(11): 168-171. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz2001411033
[9]	Pan Yi, Li Lingjiao, Ma Cunming, Luo Nan. WIND TUNNEL TEST ON THE TERMINAL OF DAOCHENG YADING AIRPORT IN SICHUAN[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44(09): 139-144.
[10]	Lin Yongjun, Song Changjiang, Luo Nan, Li Mingshui, Gao Xiujian. STUDY ON WIND TUNNEL TEST OF LARGE-SPAN SINGLE-LAYER RETICULATED SHELL STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 43(7): 130-134. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201307029
[11]	Zhang Xiaoguang, Chao Si, Huang Tao Shao, Xiaojian. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF SHOUGUANG STADIUM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(3): 117-122,167. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201203025
[12]	Zhang Mingliang, Li Qiusheng. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON WIND LOAD CHARACTERISTICS OF ROOF STRUCTURE FOR JILIN RAILWAY STATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(4): 123-130,30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201204026
[13]	Sun Binyan, Zhang Xuwei, Chen Jiaguang. VIBRATION MODES COUPLING EFFECT IN THE WIND-INDUCED RESPONSE OF A LONG SPAN ROOF[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(8): 139-143. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201208027
[14]	Li Yijia, Wang Xiaodun, Yu Jianxing. WIND TUNNEL TEST ON AERODYNAMIC UNSTABLE VIBRATION OF INVERTED Y TOWERS OF NEW HYBRID STRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(11): 106-110. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201211023
[15]	Weng Guangyuan, Wang Sheliang. VERTICAL SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF LONG-SPAN SPHERICAL SHELL STRUCTURE SUBJECT TO INCONSISTENT EXCITATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(8): 91-95. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201108022
[16]	Qi Yueqin, Liu Lingling. STUDY ON WIND TUNNEL TEST OF WIND LOADS OF DRY COAL SHEDS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 41(7): 120-124. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201107026
[17]	Liu Lin, Bai Guoliang, Kong Jiangtao, Zhao Chunlian, Li Hongxing. STUDY ON BODY COEFFICIENT AND PILE CLUSTER EFFECT OF CONCRETE PIPE COLUMNS IN SUPPORT STRUCTURE SYSTEM OF AIR COOLED CONDENSER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(3): 43-47. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200903014
[18]	Liu Lin, Bai Guoliang, Li Xiaowen, Li Hongxing, Zhao Chunlian. TEST STUDY ON WIND PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION ON WIND-BREAK WALL OF SUPPORT STRUCTURE SYSTEM OF AIR COOLED CONDENSER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(8): 46-51. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200908013
[19]	Zhao Gengqi, Bai Guoliang, Li Xiaowen. WIND TUNNEL TEST FOR GUST FACTOR OF WIND-BREAK WALL OF THREE-SPAN AIR-COOLED CONDENSER STRUCTURE SYSTEM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 39(3): 39-42. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200903013
[20]	Jia Bin, Wang Ruheng, Wang Qinhua. WIND TUNNEL TEST OF WIND LOAD CHARACTERISTICS OF A MEGASTRUCTURE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(8): 28-30. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200408009