Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Architectural Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
ZHANG Shuai, HE Na, ZHONG Wei, YANG Bo. Analysis on Deformation Characteristics of Landslides Based on Comprehensive Monitoring[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(2): 90-95. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20123004
Citation: ZHANG Shuai, HE Na, ZHONG Wei, YANG Bo. Analysis on Deformation Characteristics of Landslides Based on Comprehensive Monitoring[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(2): 90-95. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20123004

Analysis on Deformation Characteristics of Landslides Based on Comprehensive Monitoring

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20123004
  • Received Date: 2020-12-30
    Available Online: 2022-06-30
  • Publish Date: 2022-02-20
  • In order to quantitatively describe the spatial deformation characteristics of landslides, based on the survey of the topography, landform and geological structure of Yutaicun Village Landslide in Chongqing, advanced comprehensive monitoring technology including absolute surface-displacement monitoring by GPS, deep deformation monitoring by Fiber Bragg Grating and crack-deformation monitoring by automatic pull-lines were conducted. Combined with the characteristics of crack deformation of Yutaicun Village Landslide, the spatial deformation law and instability failure mechanism of the landslide were analyzed comprehensively. The results showed that: 1) The comprehensive monitoring methods were conducive to comprehensive analysis of the three-dimensional deformation characteristics of Yutaicun Village Landslide in terms of surface deformation, deep deformation and crack deformation. It was an efficient, economical, and complementary monitoring method. 2) The deformation monitoring data of Yutaicun Village Landslide showed the characteristics of phased deformation for deep sliding bodies. In the early stage of instability, the overall sliding rate of the rear part of the landslide was relatively faster, and the amount of deformation increased approximately linearly with time, and the fluctuation of the surface monitoring data had a strong response on rainfall. With the development of sliding, the crack deformation at the trailing edge gradually withdrew from the growth stage, and the crack deformation near the middle sliding body was still more active, and the difference in deformation was related to the steep terrain. 3) The unfavorable terrain and water catchment condition, continuous rainfall, water resistance of bedrock, front cut slope and back-slope stacking constitute the main controlling factors for landslide deformation.
  • [1]
    崔鹏.中国山地灾害研究进展与未来应关注的科学问题[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(2):145-152.
    [2]
    刘虎虎,缪海波,陈志伟,等.三峡库区侏罗系顺层滑坡滑带土的剪切蠕变特性[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41(8):1573-1580.
    [3]
    朱元甲,贺拿,钟卫,等.间歇型降雨对堆积层斜坡变形破坏的物理模拟研究[J].岩土力学,2020,41(12):1-11.
    [4]
    张泰丽,周爱国,孙强,等.基于深部位移监测的浙江省中林村滑坡变形特征分析[J].地质科技情报,2017,36(3):212-217.
    [5]
    谭运钊,王正祥.乌东德水电站金坪子滑坡变形监测综合分析[J].人民长江,2015,46(14):91-93.
    [6]
    冯振,金福喜,龚裔芳.红砂岩顺层边坡监测及变形破坏分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(增刊2):4078-4086.
    [7]
    HUANG F,WU P,ZIGGAH Y Y. GPS monitoring landslide deformation signal processing using time-series model[J]. International Journal of Signal Processing,Image Processing and Pattern Recognition,2016,9(3):321-332.
    [8]
    ZHANG Y,MENG X M,DIJKSTRA T A,et al. Forecasting the magnitude of potential landslides based on InSAR techniques[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2020,241:111-118.
    [9]
    赵永红,王航,张琼,等.滑坡位移监测方法综述[J].地球物理学进展,2018,33(6):2606-2612.
    [10]
    许强,董秀军,李为乐.基于天-空-地一体化的重大地质灾害隐患早期识别与监测预警[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2019,44(7):957-966.
    [11]
    刘洋,李世海,刘晓宇.拉线式滑坡地表位移实时监测系统应用实例[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2011,22(4):24-31.
    [12]
    SUN Y J,ZHANG D,SHI B,et al. Distributed acquisition, characterization and process analysis of multi-field information in slope[J]. Engineering Geology,2014,182(A):49-62.
    [13]
    万华琳,蔡德所,何薪基,等.高陡边坡深部变形的光纤传感监测试验研究[J].三峡大学学报(自然科学版),2001(1):20-23.
    [14]
    王相超.地质灾害诱发的输油管道变形光纤监测技术研究[D].南京:南京大学,2019.
    [15]
    黄润秋.论滑坡预报[J].国土资源科技管理,2004,21(6):15-20.
    [16]
    顾冬生,郭正兴,吴刚,等.土木工程施工过程的光纤光栅监控技术[J].工业建筑,2006,36(1):54-57.
    [17]
    赵能浩,易庆林.泥儿湾滑坡失稳机制及破坏后运动规律研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2016,36(6):984-993.
    [18]
    管琪,易武.陈家湾尾矿库不稳定边坡变形特征及滑动机制分析[J].三峡大学学报(自然科学版),2018,40(4):39-42.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]TANG Feifei, HU Jiaying, MA Ying, ZHOU Zhelin, WANG Jun, HAO Yafei. A Landslide Displacement Prediction Method of Particle Swarm Optimization Combined with Support Vector Machine Regression Based on Recursive Feature Elimination Selection[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 54(11): 50-60. doi: 10.3724/j.gyjzG23071806
    [2]WU Jinliao. Research on Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Long-Span Steel Structure Monitoring Based on AHP[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(6): 218-223,24. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG23042307
    [3]DU Wei, WANG Jiaying, LI Yurong, YANG Guozhu. Landslide Hazard Risk Analysis Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 53(2): 177-182. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22011009
    [4]DU Yongfeng, LI Xiangxiong, ZHANG Chao, LI Chao, Maimaitiming TURDIMAMAT, MA Zhenghe. Monitoring and Analysis for Support Deformation of Complex Seismic Isolation Structures Based on Computer Vision[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(10): 46-52. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22012407
    [5]ZHANG Hao, ZHAO Xin, LI Ang, XIE Kun, LI Pan, NIU Yongzhe. Deformation Characteristics and Treatment Plan of Zhengjiayuan Tunnel-Landslide Oblique System[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(10): 182-188. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG22062717
    [6]WANG Weizhong, GAO De. Research on Determination Methods of Safety States for Plastic Landslides[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 52(1): 137-142. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20112802
    [7]LI Tao, ZHU Baolong, LUO Bo, WANG Xiong, LI Xin. STUDY ON LOAD-BEARING CHARACTERISTICS OF PILES AND LINING STRUCTURE FOR TUNNELS IN TUNNEL-LANDSLIDE SYSTEMS WITH DIFFERENT SPACEINGS OF ANTI-SLIDE PILES[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(7): 31-38. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20040307
    [8]CHEN Gang, LI Shijun, LU Peng, LI Jian, LIN Boyun. DEFORMATION MONITORING AND FORCE ANALYSIS OF PRECAST U-GRIDERS FOR RAIL TRANSIT IN TRANSIT[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 50(6): 123-127,134. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz202006020
    [10]Yin He-ping, Xie Zhong-you. CONSTRUCTING AND MONITORING OF RECTIFICATION AND REINFORCEMENT OF A MULTIFUNCTIONAL BUILDING OF AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(10): 147-152,161. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201210031
    [11]Jiang Zhaohua, Zhang Yongxing, Cai Yu, Shang Kejian. MONITORING AND ANALYSIS OF DEFORMATION OF DEEP ROCK EXCAVATION ADJACENT TO TUNNELS[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 42(7): 95-99,90. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201207015
    [12]Wang Degui, Zhang Zhong, Zhang Xinbin, Cheng Daye. TEMPERATURE STRESS FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND STUDY ON STRAIN MONITORING AT MASS CONCRETE BASE SLAB WITH SLIDING LAYER[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(1): 8-10,16. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201001003
    [13]Ma Yongfeng, Zhou Dingheng, Cao Liqiao, Fang Shitao. IN-SITU MONITORING AND ANALYSIS OF DEFORAMTION OF THE SUPPORT SYSTEM IN MULTI-ARCH TUNNEL[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 40(11): 75-80. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz201011019
    [14]Hu Jing, Li Xinping, Qu Weilian. MULTI_SCALE ANALYSIS OF GEOTECHNICAL DEFORMATION MONITORING SIGNALS BY TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY BASED ON WAVELET TRANSFORM[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 37(2): 50-54. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200702013
    [15]Xiao Wuquan, Leng Wuming, L Wentian. ANALYSIS OF MONITORING RESULTS OF INTERNAL FORCE AND DEFORMATI ON OF SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR A SUBWAY DEEP EXCAVATION[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2004, 34(9): 5-7. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjz200409002
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 黄铭,于威海. 基于安全监测的引水工程边坡健康度分析及剩余寿命预测. 工业建筑. 2024(11): 61-66 . 本站查看
    2. 杨云飞,许万忠,郭英航,王性昊,杨子萱,郑洁茹. 含软弱夹层缓倾堆积层滑坡变形特征与失稳机制研究. 地质灾害与环境保护. 2024(04): 6-15 .
    3. 张辉,莫思,谭海英. 基于综合监测的滑坡应急治理效果评价——以贵州省桐梓县天池宫滑坡为例. 中国地质调查. 2023(02): 87-93 .
    4. 李晓斌,白海军. 变质岩区大型高位滑坡的变形监测预报研究. 大地测量与地球动力学. 2023(10): 1045-1050 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-022024-032024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-0105101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 10.4 %FULLTEXT: 10.4 %META: 83.2 %META: 83.2 %PDF: 6.4 %PDF: 6.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 2.4 %其他: 2.4 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %上海: 1.6 %上海: 1.6 %东莞: 1.6 %东莞: 1.6 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %兰州: 0.4 %兰州: 0.4 %北京: 4.4 %北京: 4.4 %十堰: 2.4 %十堰: 2.4 %南京: 0.8 %南京: 0.8 %南宁: 0.8 %南宁: 0.8 %南昌: 0.4 %南昌: 0.4 %南通: 0.8 %南通: 0.8 %咸阳: 0.4 %咸阳: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %商丘: 0.4 %商丘: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.8 %嘉兴: 0.8 %天津: 0.8 %天津: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %安康: 0.8 %安康: 0.8 %宝鸡: 0.4 %宝鸡: 0.4 %宣城: 2.4 %宣城: 2.4 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 0.8 %广州: 0.8 %延安: 0.4 %延安: 0.4 %张家口: 1.2 %张家口: 1.2 %成都: 1.6 %成都: 1.6 %扬州: 1.6 %扬州: 1.6 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.8 %杭州: 1.2 %杭州: 1.2 %桂林: 0.4 %桂林: 0.4 %武汉: 3.2 %武汉: 3.2 %泰州: 0.8 %泰州: 0.8 %济南: 1.6 %济南: 1.6 %海西: 0.4 %海西: 0.4 %湘潭: 6.4 %湘潭: 6.4 %漯河: 5.2 %漯河: 5.2 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 7.6 %芒廷维尤: 7.6 %芝加哥: 2.0 %芝加哥: 2.0 %苏州: 0.8 %苏州: 0.8 %西宁: 22.0 %西宁: 22.0 %西安: 1.2 %西安: 1.2 %贵阳: 2.4 %贵阳: 2.4 %达州: 0.8 %达州: 0.8 %运城: 4.4 %运城: 4.4 %邯郸: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.8 %郑州: 1.6 %郑州: 1.6 %鄂州: 0.8 %鄂州: 0.8 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %铜仁: 0.4 %铜仁: 0.4 %长沙: 2.0 %长沙: 2.0 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %黄山: 0.4 %黄山: 0.4 %龙岩: 0.4 %龙岩: 0.4 %其他其他China上海东莞保定兰州北京十堰南京南宁南昌南通咸阳哈尔滨商丘嘉兴天津太原安康宝鸡宣城常州常德广州延安张家口成都扬州晋城朝阳杭州桂林武汉泰州济南海西湘潭漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州西宁西安贵阳达州运城邯郸郑州鄂州重庆铜仁长沙青岛黄山龙岩

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (207) PDF downloads(17) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return