Core Chinese Journal
Source Journal of CSCD
Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Included in the Hierarchical Directory of High-quality Technical Journals in Architecture Science Field
Volume 51 Issue 3
Jul.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HAN Dongdong, MEN Yuming, WANG Peng. MODEL TESTS ON INFLUENCES OF STIFFNESS AND SPACING FOR BEAMS ON LATTICE BEAMS BY PRESTRESSED ANCHORAGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(3): 136-141. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20052107
Citation: HAN Dongdong, MEN Yuming, WANG Peng. MODEL TESTS ON INFLUENCES OF STIFFNESS AND SPACING FOR BEAMS ON LATTICE BEAMS BY PRESTRESSED ANCHORAGE[J]. INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, 2021, 51(3): 136-141. doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20052107

MODEL TESTS ON INFLUENCES OF STIFFNESS AND SPACING FOR BEAMS ON LATTICE BEAMS BY PRESTRESSED ANCHORAGE

doi: 10.13204/j.gyjzG20052107
  • Received Date: 2020-05-21
    Available Online: 2021-07-17
  • Through model tests of interaction between lattice beams by prestressed anchorage with different cross sections and spacing of beams, the earth pressure, the strain of rebars in lattice the beams and the tension forces of the anchors were measured, and the influences of the stiffness and spacing on the bottom reaction of lattice beams, the internal forces of lattice beams and tension forces of anchors were analyzed. The results showed that when the stiffness of lattice beams was larger, the reaction on beams was more uniform, the tension forces of the anchors and the deformation of lattice beams were also more uniform, the strain of lattice beams was smaller, while the bending moment in the beams was larger. When the stiffness of lattice beams was the same, the larger the spacing, the greater the difference of tension forces in anchors, the smaller the base reaction, the worse the uniformity of the reaction, and the larger the bending moment of beams. When the amounts of spans were more, the bending moment was smaller.
  • loading
  • 张涛, 石胜伟, 谢忠胜. 格构锚固体系承载机理及破坏模式的试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(6):108-113.
    宋军, 梁炯, 石胜伟, 等. 预应力格构锚固结构受力特征模型试验研究[J]. 地质力学学报, 2018, 24(3):432-438.
    肖世国, 周德培. 非全长黏结型锚索锚固段长度的一种确定方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(9):1530-1534.
    李怀珍, 李学华. 基于界面滑移脱黏的锚杆合理锚固长度研究[J]. 岩石力学, 2017, 38(11):3106-3112.
    许英姿, 唐辉明. 滑坡治理中格构锚固结构的解析解分析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2002, 21(3):89-93.
    杨明, 胡厚田, 卢才金, 等. 路堑土质边坡加固中预应力锚索框架的内力计算[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(9):1383-1386.
    殷跃平. 滑坡钢筋砼格构防治"倒梁法"内力计算研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2005(6):52-56.
    肖世国, 周德培. 岩石高边坡一种预应力锚索框架型地梁的内力计算[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002, 24(4):479-482.
    肖世国, 周德培. 岩石高边坡预应力锚索地梁的一种内力计算方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(2):250-253.
    王娟娟, 邓军涛, 门玉明. 锚杆格构梁模型试验及格构梁内力计算[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2015, 42(2):64-68.
    李群. 格构梁双参数设计理论与应用研究[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学, 2007.
    唐辉明,许英姿,程新生. 滑坡治理工程中钢筋混凝土格构梁设计理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(11):1683-1687.
    王志俭, 万诚, 赵家成. 格构梁刚度及地基变形模量对格构梁弯矩的影响研究[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(2):50-53.
    朱宝龙, 杨明, 胡厚田, 等. 土质边坡加固中预应力锚索框架内力分布的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(4):697-702.
    张涛, 石胜伟, 谢忠胜, 等. 格构锚固体系梁下土体反力分布规律的试验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2014(3):70-75.
    梁炯, 石胜伟, 张勇, 等. 锚索格构梁受力分布的现场模型试验研究[J]. 人民长江, 2017, 48(10):69-73.
    韩冬冬, 门玉明, 梁炜. 预应力格构梁基底反力分布规律模型试验研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2015, 23(5):976-981.
    韩冬冬, 门玉明, 刘璐. 预应力格构锚固体系格构梁内力分布规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(8):1619-1627.
    韩冬冬, 门玉明, 胡兆江. 土质滑坡格构锚杆抗滑机制及受力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4):1189-1194

    , 1202.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (89) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return